Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire
  • omnibus

BAR Book Forum: Samantha Pinto’s Book, “Infamous Bodies”
Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
16 Sep 2020
BAR Book Forum: Samantha Pinto’s Book, “Infamous Bodies”
BAR Book Forum: Samantha Pinto’s Book, “Infamous Bodies”

The author examines the lives of five Black female historical figures and challenges some deeply-held ideas about Black women in politics

“This book is for the bold, and those who want to rethink the limits of our current political imagination.”

In this series, we ask acclaimed authors to answer five questions about their book. This week’s featured author is Samantha Pinto. Pinto is Associate Professor of English at the University of Texas at Austin. Her book is Infamous Bodies: Early Black Women’s Celebrity and the Afterlives of Rights.

Roberto Sirvent: How can your book help BAR readers understand the current political and social climate?

Samantha Pinto: Infamous Bodies  really digs into what celebrity means to black political thought—and I hope challenges some deeply-held ideas of what Black women should or shouldn’t do (or who they should be) in politics.  It considers some of the most difficult black women figures in the modern world—Phillis Wheatley, Sally Hemings, Sarah Baartman, Mary Seacole, and Sarah Forbes Bonetta-- and insists that we view them, and continue to represent them, beyond (but still including) lack, injury, and what I call “corrective histories” that attempt to bring them into stories of redemption and resistance.  Instead, I argue for remaking our politics in their images, with all of their vulnerabilities.  Rather than fight ridiculous “post-fact” certainty with more assertions of what’s right, my book sits with the uncertainty these figures produce, and wonders what a politics based on a recognition of mutual need and uneven vulnerability might look like.  

In my first book, I put so much emphasis on the possibility of the text, and hence the figure of the author.  But I consider that book, too, at its core, as a call to rethink our reception and reading practices— what happens when we don’t mark experimental lit as the outside but the center of the field— what happens to the ways we read race, gender, and national boundaries.  With Infamous Bodies, I wanted to move away from the author as much as possible, and away from the fetishization of non-normativity as much as possible— which sounds weird, then, to focus on exceptional celebrities but it’s the fact that these exceptions have been used to stand as examples— tragic or heroic— of the perils of normative blackness that interests me.  And it is artists’ and others’ efforts to situate these five figures within the normative that interests me as a critic, rather than seeking to make resistance as we already recognize it out of the deeply complicated lives of these usually public black women figures.  It’s their repetition where the meaning happens, repeats, changes, keeps our politics mutable and uncertain, points us to something else to claim as the subject of politics and our political goals.

What do you hope activists and community organizers will take away from reading your book?

I hope it sits alongside the work of contemporary organizers and activists who are often so creative and innovative in their adoption of new platforms and new strategies of politics only to be cut down for not doing things in recognizable or perfect ways.   This book is for the imperfect, the bold, and those who want to rethink the limits of our current political imagination.   It’s very much about how there’s room for more and different work under the banner of “the political” and political art and organizing, and within Black and feminist studies—really, the book is about the amazing range of not just Black art and culture but black political thought, especially black feminist thought.  It’s also about how there’s room for contradiction, failure, impurity, ambition, beauty, the feminine, the popular, and difficulty in anti-racist political thought and organizing.    Though I don’t pretend that I can really say anything important to activists, who have their own important work and models and idioms to consider, I do hope this book engages the perils of what the kids call “virtue signaling” as the base or limit of political action.  I don’t mean this dismissively—I think there is so much pressure on activists and organizers (and academics) to publicly perform perfect and perfectly consistent politics.  My book thinks through other possibilities for political performance and investment, and it refuses to see the difficult figures within as stuck between the poles of resistance and false consciousness.  

We know readers will learn a lot from your book, but what do you hope readers will un-learn? In other words, is there a particular ideology you’re hoping to dismantle?

Absolutely—it’s challenging a sometimes unconscious but pervasive view that feminine embodiment and vulnerability are defined by lack, or the absence of the political, and that they need to be fixed or circumvented or routed so that everyone’s politics looks like what we already know.  We see this—and this is my opening example in the book, and the subject of a separate article I published this summer in Theory & Event—in the reception of Beyonce as an “evolving” feminist, rather than working out different forms of feminism in all of her career iterations. I want the reader to take seriously feelings of frailty, pleasure, desire, vanity, ambition—ugly feelings that don’t necessarily produce the kinds of black feminist politics one wants to show to the world that are embodied in celebrity culture and its reception.  What can we produce with those feelings in Black Studies, especially in Black Feminist Studies?   Infamous Bodies  is trying to answer that in one form, by tracing a genealogy of black women’s embodied performance that centers on this complex nexus of personhood and politics.  I try to do that with compassion and with full-knowledge that there is so much that I have to unlearn, and that I will keep doing so for the rest of my career.

Who are the intellectual heroes that inspire your work?

I’m going to name two scholars whose work underwrites this book and pretty much everything I do: Ann duCille and Claudia Tate. Their groundbreaking work stretched and stretches not just black literary studies but Black studies. We could all learn so much from their diagnoses and critiques of “reading protocols” that overdetermine how African American texts and contexts are read. The world lost Prof. Tate’s brilliant mind too soon. Prof. duCille continues to grace us with her amazing work—no one more acutely and sensitively reads cultural and critical structures than she does.   My citing of these two scholars is a way to honor the intellectual legacy of—and my intellectual formation through reading—the first “wave” (and 1.5 wave) of black feminist literary theorists in the academy.  These critics—so many taken from us too soon—continue to challenge and inspire me: Karla FC Holloway. Deborah McDowell. Mary Helen Washington. Hortense Spillers. Hazel Carby. Valerie Smith.  Nellie McKay. Barbara Christian. Cheryl Wall was a mentor and a gift of a human being, as well as a wonderful, tireless thinker.  I still can’t believe she is gone. Reread them.  Read their new work, too.  They have so much to say that we haven’t learned yet.  They have so much to say that is being repeated or dismissed now, without citation. They have so much to say including and beyond literary criticism. You don’t have to cite them to make them saints or sages—read them because they are whip-smart, complex thinkers who articulated nuanced critiques of the field as it was forming and as it still stands. And then go (re)read Adrienne Kennedy, Fran Ross, and Patricia J. Williams, for good measure.  

In what way does your book help us imagine new worlds?

I hope that by foregrounding new ways to see the past, and the way we are constantly remaking our public, Infamous Bodies  helps us to see our current world differently—as a place where black women and black feminism are at the center of our ways of living, being, loving, failing, hurting, and getting political even when it seems these actions and texts and people are not occupying these spheres as we currently know them.  I hope we can imagine ourselves occupying a Left politics differently, allowing for other imaginaries to come through to rescale, recalibrate, and remake the political.  I hope we can see how vulnerable our interpretations of history are, and approach our critical and political work with the humility that we, too, have attachments and protocols that we can’t identify and that will inevitable change, fail, and expose themselves.  I hope Infamous Bodies  helps to imagine a world, and an academy, that exhibits more tenderness and grace, and that is able to embrace uncertainty.  I doubt it will perform any of these lofty goals, but it’s the space the book is written from nonetheless!

Roberto Sirvent is Professor of Political and Social Ethics at Hope International University in Fullerton, CA, and an Affiliate Scholar at Yale University’s Interdisciplinary Center for Bioethics, where he directs the Race, Bioethics, and Public Health Project. He is co-author, with fellow BAR contributor Danny Haiphong, of the book, American Exceptionalism and American Innocence: A People’s History of Fake News—From the Revolutionary War to the War on Terror.

COMMENTS?

Please join the conversation on Black Agenda Report's Facebook page at http://facebook.com/blackagendareport

Or, you can comment by emailing us at [email protected]

BAR Book Forum

Trending

Elizabeth Warren Wants Green Bombs, not a Green New Deal
Parallels Between Black and Palestinian Struggles
Cory Booker Hates Public Schools
Bill Cosby Should Have Been Denounced by Black America Long Ago
The Black Wall Around Barack Obama: Who Does It Protect Him Against?
How Complacency, Complicity of Black Misleadership Class Led to Supreme Court Evisceration of the Voting Rights Act

Related Stories

BAR Book Forum: L.H. Stallings’ “Funk the Erotic”
Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
BAR Book Forum: L.H. Stallings’ “Funk the Erotic”
20 January 2021
We need a different relationship to and with time and temporality to imagine new worlds and to begin bringing those new worlds into being.
BAR Book Forum: John Murillo III’s “Impossible Stories”
Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
BAR Book Forum: John Murillo III’s “Impossible Stories”
20 January 2021
The author dissects Black time and space in order to better understand the nature and mechanics of Black life and death lived in the antiblack worl
BAR Book Forum: Zakiya Luna’s “Reproductive Rights as Human Rights”
Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
BAR Book Forum: Zakiya Luna’s “Reproductive Rights as Human Rights”
13 January 2021
This book is a story about a group of (mostly) women who wanted to make change and understood that liberation is an inside job.  
BAR Book Forum: Chris A. Barcelos’ “Distributing Condoms and Hope”
Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
BAR Book Forum: Chris A. Barcelos’ “Distributing Condoms and Hope”
13 January 2021
Replacing cops with social workers could “reproduce the same kinds of harm,” as this author explains.
BAR Book Forum: Yelena Bailey’s “How the Streets Were Made”
Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
BAR Book Forum: Yelena Bailey’s “How the Streets Were Made”
16 December 2020
The streets permeate dominant understandings of Blackness, and the life-and-death consequences of these perceptions are at the heart of this book.
BAR Book Forum: Grace A. Musila’s Book, “Wangari Maathai's Registers of Freedom”
Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
BAR Book Forum: Grace A. Musila’s Book, “Wangari Maathai's Registers of Freedom”
16 December 2020
Maathai’s approach to environmental conservation centers poor rural communities, especially women, and their need for fuel, fodder and income
BAR Book Forum: B. Brian Foster’s “I Don’t Like the Blues”
Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
BAR Book Forum: B. Brian Foster’s “I Don’t Like the Blues”
10 December 2020
What happens if we really pay attention to what black folks in the rural South are saying and doing in their everyday lives?
BAR Book Forum: Jessica Gordon Nembhard’s “Collective Courage”
Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
BAR Book Forum: Jessica Gordon Nembhard’s “Collective Courage”
02 December 2020
Many of the great African American thinkers, movers, and shakers were also leaders in the Black cooperative movement.
BAR Book Forum: Ana-Maurine Lara’s “Queer Freedom : Black Sovereignty” and “Streetwalking”
Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
BAR Book Forum: Ana-Maurine Lara’s “Queer Freedom : Black Sovereignty” and “Streetwalking”
02 December 2020
The author wants us to deepen our analysis of how power moves through the world to constrain Black life, and how queer Black people resist these co
BAR Book Forum: Erin Manning’s “For a Pragmatics of the Useless”
Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
BAR Book Forum: Erin Manning’s “For a Pragmatics of the Useless”
25 November 2020
Schizoanalysis opens up new alliances (approximations) in the uneasy overlaps of neurodiversity and black life.

More Stories


  • Trump as Othello in a Corporate Theater
    Glen Ford, BAR Executive Editor
    Trump as Othello in a Corporate Theater
    21 Jan 2021
    Trump the straw man has finally been knocked down, giving the Democrats a victory that costs their corporate masters nothing.
  • The Left Lens: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and American Empire, with Ajamu Baraka
    Danny Haiphong and Margaret Kimberley
    The Left Lens: Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and American Empire, with Ajamu Baraka
    20 Jan 2021
    Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s birthday is often celebrated without any regard for his radical political legacy.
  • Freedom Rider: Why the Left Don’t Protest
    Margaret Kimberley, BAR senior columnist
    Freedom Rider: Why the Left Don’t Protest
    20 Jan 2021
    The worse the political and economic crisis becomes, the more lethargic the US left behaves – as if generations of collaboration with corporate Democrats has sucked the life out of the left.
  • Return to the Source: Democracy is Dead
    Editors, The Black Agenda Review
    Return to the Source: Democracy is Dead
    20 Jan 2021
    By what stretch of the imagination can the US be a democracy when ordinary citizens have virtually no influence over what their government does? 
  • Uganda: Bobi Wine Rocks the Vote but Museveni Claims Victory
    Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor
    Uganda: Bobi Wine Rocks the Vote but Museveni Claims Victory
    20 Jan 2021
    Ugandan pop star turned presidential candidate Bobi Wine is not Sankara or Lumumba, but he has risked his life to mount a fierce challenge to the 36-year dictatorship of President Yoweri Museveni.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us