Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Why Black MisLeadership Won’t Sign the Anti-War Petition
Glen Ford, BAR executive editor
26 Jan 2011
🖨️ Print Article

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

“We vow not to support President Barack Obama for renomination for another term in office, and to actively seek to impede his war policies unless and until he reverses them,“ says a petition signed by hundreds of social activists, only a handful of them Black. The baton of progressive political and moral leadership may be passing from Black America, dominated by a venal misleadership class that refuses to actively oppose President Obama’s wars.

Why Black MisLeadership Won’t Sign the Anti-War Petition

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

“These African American misleaders are the political heirs to those Blacks that derided Dr. King for taking his stand against Lyndon Johnson’s war.”

A Petition is making the rounds, in which hundreds of signatories have vowed to oppose President Obama “as long as he supports war.” It’s the kind of message that Dr. Martin Luther King would have signed onto. We know this, because that’s precisely what Dr. King told President Lyndon Johnson, in April of 1967: that he would oppose his president and onetime ally as long as Johnson continued to wage war in Vietnam. Many believe that’s the reason Dr. King was assassinated exactly one year later.

There are very few Black names on the current anti-war petition, but not because Black notables fear assassination if they oppose Obama’s wars. It is because the narrow and selfish class that has come to dominate the political life of Black America thinks it can do better for itself by collaborating with the war makers than by opposing them. Believing themselves to be somehow wired into power through the Democratic Party and their corporate connections, these African American misleaders are the political heirs to those Blacks that derided Dr. King for taking his stand against Lyndon Johnson’s war. They are the same opportunists that berated Dr. King for sacrificing what had been a close, working political relationship with the most powerful man in the world, over the issue of war. Dr. King’s answer to them was that the war must be opposed, not only on moral grounds, but because it condemned the poor of the United States to remain in that condition, by draining the government and society of all available resources “like some demonic destructive suction tube.”

“Obama’s multiple and expanding wars are no less antithetical to the interests of African Americans, today.”

Dr. King was saying to the Black leadership class of his day: it may serve your personal interests to collaborate with President Johnson and pro-war Democrats and thus remain in good standing with power, but you are harming the interests of the poor, of Black people as a whole, and of all humanity. To be on the wrong side on the war, or to engage in endless dithering and delay in order to avoid confrontation with power on the issue of war, is to work against the fundamental interests of one’s own people. Dr. King was forced by urgent necessity to break with President Johnson because war was against the interests of the Black America.

Obama’s multiple and expanding wars are no less antithetical to the interests of African Americans, today. The “demonic destructive suction tube” that feeds a trillion dollars a year into Obama’s wars strips Black America of all hope of emerging from permanent Depression. As long as such fantastic sums are expended on war, there is no escape from an economic race to the bottom that will mangle Black society beyond recognition.

The Black misleadership class, fearful to protect their own, tenuous political and corporate connections, give lip service to peace but refuse to confront the President that makes war. In thrall of power in a Black face, and hoping some of the benefits will accrue to themselves, they allow the baton of progressivism to pass from the hands of Black America, or fall to the ground. History will look on them with revulsion.

For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford. Sign the anti-war petition at WarIsACrime.org.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • Venezuela
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    Week of Action in Solidarity with Venezuela
    14 Nov 2025
    The U.S. regime change effort against Venezuela has recently intensified with the killings of Venezuelans, Trinidadians, and Colombians said to be drug traffickers, the latest salvo in the long U.S.…
  • Peoples tribunal
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    International People's Tribunal for Palestine
    14 Nov 2025
    We're joined by Farah Imad, an organizer of the International People's Tribunal for Palestine, which takes place in Barcelona on November 22nd and 23rd. She is a lawyer who has written about…
  • Venezuela
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    Glen Ford on the Bipartisan Nature of American Exceptionalism
    14 Nov 2025
    The Trump administration’s threats against Venezuela are a reminder that U.S. aggression is thoroughly bipartisan. In 2019, Glen Ford provided this analysis of a Democratic Party presidential debate…
  • Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
    Democrats' Treachery Ends the Shutdown
    12 Nov 2025
    Voter support for the Democratic Party in the government shutdown showdown was irrelevant. The Senate capitulation was a cynical and inevitable endgame for a party devoted to the austerity race to…
  • Editors, The Black Agenda Review
    ESSAY: The Southern Sudan, Joseph U. Garang, 1969
    12 Nov 2025
    “Thus it can be said that British colonialism is mainly responsible for the Southern Sudan problem…”
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us