by Ezili Danto
Singer Wyclef Jean continues to distract attention from the realities of Haiti, despite his having been declared ineligible to make a run for the presidency. With the most popular political party barred from the November ballot, it is absurd to talk of democracy. Haiti’s reality is foreign occupation and loss of sovereignty. “Exacerbating catastrophe to capitalize on catastrophe is a workable formula for key stakeholders in Haiti affairs, as these elections may provide fresh reasons to perpetuate the U.N./U.S. presence in Haiti.”
Wyclef Jean's presidential candidacy in Haiti
by Ezili Danto
This article previously appeared in The Progressive.
“In every election since 2004, when President Bush ousted Haiti's democratically elected leader, Jean-Bertrand Aristide, Haiti's most popular political party, the Fanmi Lavalas, has been excluded from participation.”
The on-again, off-again presidential candidacy of musician Wyclef Jean is a distraction for Haiti.
On Friday, Aug. 20, the Haiti Electoral Council ruled that 15 out of the 34 candidates had not met the legal requirements to run for president of Haiti. Jean was one of the rejected candidates and he's chosen to appeal the decision.
That's his right, but I wish the media would focus less on this personality-driven story and more on the reality of what's going on in Haiti right now.
Almost eight months after the earthquake, the recovery effort in Haiti is going almost nowhere.
There are 2 million homeless earthquake victims still on the streets of Port-au-Prince, the capital. Less than 5 percent of the rubble has been removed from the streets to make room for permanent shelters. And 20 percent of those living in the 1,300 tent camps have, in the past month, been forcibly evicted with nowhere to go.
There are almost no homes to live in, no jobs to be had.
This is a disgrace, considering all the donations, upward of $1 billion, that came in to the nongovernmental institutions after the earthquake. Much of this money is earning interest for charity executives; it is not reaching the earthquake victims.
The coming election seems to have plenty of candidates but not much of an electorate. How are the 2 million homeless, who lost everything, including their identification cards, going to be able to vote on Nov. 28?
“Twenty percent of those living in the 1,300 tent camps have, in the past month, been forcibly evicted with nowhere to go.”
Will the people outside of the capital and surrounding cities where the earthquake hit be able to vote? Or is the purpose of these elections that primarily the wealthy, whose houses didn't crumble in the earthquake and who all have their identification cards, be the ones to vote?
If so, how could this be called a representative government? In every election since 2004, when President Bush ousted Haiti's democratically elected leader, Jean-Bertrand Aristide, Haiti's most popular political party, the Fanmi Lavalas, has been excluded from participation.
Again, how can any government, then, be called representative? Even if Wyclef Jean wins this appeal, how are his constituents, in the crumbled areas without IDs, voter registrations and addresses, going to vote? Moreover, even if the masses do vote, who will make sure their votes are not dumped into garbage bins, as happened in the 2006 presidential election?
But Jean only puts on the dress of a populist to get votes and pander to a desperate population. As he's said, "Don't worry, I'm not a populist, I'm a capitalist."
Haiti is a country that needs the government to lead, not the private sector that's failed for 200 years to do so. The Haitian government must ensure the human rights of the majority to shelter, medicine, food, clean water, justice, inclusion, dignity and living-wage jobs.
“Jean has said, ‘Don't worry, I'm not a populist, I'm a capitalist.’"
We need to ask whether these rushed elections, scheduled for Nov. 28, will bring relief if they further destabilize the country by enraging the Haitian majority, which is likely to see its voice stifled yet again.
Exacerbating catastrophe to capitalize on catastrophe is a workable formula for key stakeholders in Haiti affairs, as these elections may provide fresh reasons to perpetuate the U.N./U.S. presence in Haiti.
Supposedly the Haitian government, which says it is bankrupt from the earthquake, has pledged $7 million of the $29.6 million it will cost to run these elections. The rest of the election monies will come from mostly foreigners.
Will they use their clout to support a candidate that will put their interests above those of the Haitian people? Under the circumstances, there are more important things for Haitians to do than holding this election. The $29.6 million could be better used to employ Haitians to remove all the rubble and erect permanent housing.
Ezili Danto is the founder of the Haitian Lawyers Leadership Network. She wrote this for Progressive Media Project, a source of liberal commentary on domestic and international issues; it is affiliated with The Progressive magazine. She can be contacted at: Progressive Media Project, 409 East Main Street, Madison, Wis. 53703 or e-mail pmproj@progressive.org.
In this month’s Afghanistan News Update, the Black Alliance for Peace Solidarity Network’s Afghanistan Committee includes an interview with Obaidullah Baheer, a lecturer at the American…
Reproductive justice in the wake of SCOTUS overturning Roe v. Wade, campaign to free Mumia Abu Jamal, and Frederick Douglass speech "What to the Slave is the 4th of July" read by Ossie Davis.
We discuss reproductive justice in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling which overturned the Roe v. Wade decision. Loretta Ross is co- author of the book Reproductive Justice, and co-founder of…
Gwen Debrow of the Campaign to Free Mumia joins to tell us what we can do to go all out for Mumia during the July 3rd nationwide actions.
On July 5, 1852 Frederick Douglass was asked to speak on the topic of the nation’s independence celebration. Now known as What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?, the speech was a stinging…
