Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire
  • omnibus

Let’s Just Get Along: Poll Passes Up Structural Analysis of Race
Bill Quigley
09 Jan 2008

by Seth Wessler

PollCartoon

Measuring racial attitudes is notoriously difficult, and using polls to probe the extent of institutional racism can only be useful if the pollsters are clear on what institutional racism actually is. Surveys of individual attitudes towards various ethnic and racial groups can yield only subjective data on how folks "get along" - or think they are getting along. In the end, any survey that "starts with an assumption that race and racism are primarily issues about how X individual of one race feels about Z individual of a different race" is of limited utility. Racism is more than the sum of a nation's individual human attitudinal parts. It's a system.

 

Let's Just Get Along: Poll Passes Up Structural Analysis of Race

by Seth Wessler

This article originally appeared in RaceWire, the ColorLines Blog.

"The poll is bound by a narrow understanding of race and racism."

Pollpeople Race, racism, and racial stereotypes run deep according to a new opinion poll of over a thousand Blacks, Latinos and Asians by New American Media. The poll asserts that people of color in different groups don't trust each other and feel like race, racism and ethnic cleavages are just as present as they've always been despite some hope for change.

No surprise thus far. But where do we take this old news?

The poll is framed as something new and, to a certain extent, actually asking people of color what they think about race and racism is a step in the right direction. But the poll doesn't quite do what it could because it is bound by a narrow understanding of race and racism on the front and back ends. The poll, like so many other efforts to figure out "race relations," starts with an assumption that race and racism are primarily issues about how X individual of one race feels about Z individual of a different race.

On the front end, we've got a problem with the questions themselves. Have you ever dated someone of a different race?; Do you have any Black friends, Asian friends, Latino friends?; Would you rather do business with white people or Asian people?. As a result of asking these questions, the poll offers the same answers we always get: Racism is a problem and racial divisions are serious problems. In response: lets just get along.

On the back end, the way the poll is used; the messages we take from it; and the action we propose to take, all risk being similarly bound by an individualized understanding of racism. But running stories in the ethnic media about mixed-race relationships isn't going to solve the problem of racism.

"Racism runs deep because it is ingrained in the institutions, the laws, the policies, and the cultural currents that dominate."

Racism is a societal problem; it is structural and historical. It runs deep because it is ingrained in the institutions, the laws, the policies, and the cultural currents that dominate. And herein lies the problem with the poll: it assumes that individuals aren't influenced by the dominant messages and frames that we hear over and over, and it doesn't question the institutional basis of them.

The point is this: if the goal is to encourage the creation of a multiracial civil society, then racism needs to be addressed through institutional and structural interventions. Taking race seriously in this context means asking questions about media's role in perpetuating racist policies, institutional practices and social myths that pit groups against each other. The New American Media poll could help us to move in this direction but it will have to be taken to the pedestal and used to reshape the messages in the ethnic media and mainstream media.

When we build a society that values all people, a just society that does not punish and abandon people of color, then maybe we'll have a society where people trust each other.

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles. Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • COP26: Greenwashing and Plutocratic Misadventures
    ​​​​​​​ Ajamu Baraka, BAR editor and columnist
    COP26: Greenwashing and Plutocratic Misadventures
    17 Nov 2021
    For all the policy failures of COP26 it may actually be an inflection point in history -- a point where social and political conditions force a transformation of consciousness and politics that
  • Credit: AFP
    Jemima Pierre, BAR Editor and Columnist
    A Dirty Occupation: The UN’s Criminal Enterprise and Ecological Catastrophe in Haiti
    17 Nov 2021
    What are the environmental and ecological impacts of large-scale military occupations by the United Nations “peacekeeping” missions?
  • Editors, The Black Agenda Review
    EXCERPT: Genocide: The Social Lynching of Africans and their descendants in Brazil, Abdias do Nascimento
    17 Nov 2021
    The late Brazilian intellectual, artist, and activist Abdias do Nascimento argues that racial democracy is premised on an idea of racial mixing that not only valorizes whiteness, but is predica
  • BAR Book Forum: Camisha Russell’s “The Assisted Reproduction of Race”
    Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
    BAR Book Forum: Camisha Russell’s “The Assisted Reproduction of Race”
    17 Nov 2021
    In this series, we ask acclaimed authors to answer five questions about their book.
  • It is the liberal class which is determined to censor as much of public discourse as possible. They work with big technology social media companies to determine what will and will not be seen and heard in the media. In so doing they narrow the issues and positions which the public are able to consider for themselves.
    Danny Haiphong, BAR Contributing Editor
    Censorship is the Last Gasp of the Liberal Class
    17 Nov 2021
    It is the liberal class which is determined to censor as much of public discourse as possible.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us