by BAR managing editor Bruce A. Dixon
The “Peoples Summit” in Chicago might have been a chance for Berniecrats to compare experiences and insights. But summit organizers, afraid to even call themselves Democrats knew they couldn't trust rank and file activists to stick to the script. Instead of hearing activists, they tried to herd them, preaching and exhorting attendees from keynotes and the front of the room to unite and hold their noses if need be for the lesser evil.
Democrats in Denial: The Peoples Summit
by BAR managing editor Bruce A. Dixon
Last weekend's Peoples Summit in Chicago was several different things. For the rank and file supporters of Bernie Sanders who could get there, it was likely the closest thing they'll get to a national victory party. It was a chance to commiserate and celebrate. It might have been a chance to compare and analyze experiences from around the country, an opportunity to synthesize the lessons and discuss the options for what Bernie Sanders called his “political revolution.” But it seems the conveners of the Peoples Summit didn't much trust their rank and file to draw the correct conclusions.
Summit attendees I talked to said there was considerable willingness on the part of rank and file activists to consider third party options. But the summit's conveners and headliners squashed and disparaged that, providing only the usual litany of reason after reason to unite, to defeat Trump. The Green Party's Jill Stein contacted summit organizers and asked to address the event, and was turned down. The conveners knew what they were doing. For them, the Peoples Summit was never about raising up and hearing rank and file activists and encouraging them to chart the way forward. It was about keeping Berniecrats inside the Democratic herd long enough, with noses held or not, to get out the vote for Hillary or against Trump, either way.
The summit conveners tread a clear and well established line. They mostly couldn't talk about the Democratic party, or specifically identify themselves as Democrats, though they just finished running a candidate in Democratic primary elections across the country, a candidate who calls himself an independent but is sworn to back the Democratic nominee win or lose. There's a reason you can comb the web site of the Peoples Summit, and scarcely find, except in the lists of sponsoring organizations, the words “Democratic Party.” It's because campaigning Democrats must disassociate themselves from performance of Democrats in office, from the Rahm Emanuels and Michael Nutters, to the Andrew Cuomos, the Barack Obamas and the Clintons and so many others in city halls, state legislatures, governors mansions and congress is so far from the aspirations of activists in Democratic primaries that for years now few will even identify themselves as Democrats.
Ranking Dems hired PR firms to tell them this years ago, which is why the entire leftish wing of the Democratic party and its satellite operations from Bernie's campaign to Daily Kos and Netroots to the Peoples Summit don't much call themselves Democrats. They call themselves progressives or the progressive movement, or just “the movement.” These are terms they've borrowed from other eras, cleansed of their historical content and turned into brands, devoid of specific meaning but calculated to evoke real or imagined memories or feelings in the minds of listeners. It's the same kind of nonsense theater as the sit-in happening on the floor of Congress Wednesday morning as this piece is being written.
I can understand their reluctance to admit they're Democrats. For the quarter century from 1974 to 2000 I was a volunteer, staffer and organizer in a series of Democratic primary challenges, voter registration drives and general election campaigns in Chicago, always for lefty and independent candidates in the primaries, and holding my nose to prevent greater evils in November. But I never, ever called myself a Democrat. Obviously I was in denial.
In the 70s, the 80s and the 90s, Democratic honchos depended on people like me to get out there in the projects and the neighborhoods and talk to people who wouldn't talk to them, to organize constituencies which which wouldn't listen to them, the voters who'd stay home if nobody they respected courted them. We'd worked those same neighborhoods hard for opposition candidates in Democratic primaries, winning sometimes, most notably City Hall in Chicago in 1983 and 87, and the occasional city council, legislative or congressional race. More often though we lost to big money, big media and outright fraud, much as the Sanders campaign did this year. The voters we dragged back into the fold for our opposition campaigns in Democratic primaries sometimes elected good people, but mostly they strengthened the hand of lesser evil one percenter Democrats in general elections. Year by year, one percenter Dems tweaked the rules on ballot access, voter registration, on primary elections, big money and other areas to raise the obstacles to success in Democratic primaries ever higher, and eliminated primaries for offices like mayor altogether.
So there were two conversations in Chicago last weekend. The folks at the front of the rooms agonized about whether they'd have access to Bernie's database, and called upon activists to hold their noses and if need be create an “independent defeat Trump movement.” They discussed variations of discredited fusion and inside-outside strategies too. Most of the rank and file in the back of the rooms, participants told Black Agenda Report, were simply glad to be in each others company, enjoying the free food and parties, and working out what to do next on their own.
The Illinois Green Party, which purchased a table was surprised to find itself named as a “partner” of the summit.
Participants were encouraged by summit organizers to go back home where they could run and staff campaigns for local office.
“That's what people say after every election,” remarked attendee Yvette Carnell, founder of Breaking Brown, and a former Capitol Hill staffer. “I don't think the Democratic party can be saved, though. Local candidates are still in a party not designed for them to succeed. That party will either squash them or change them.”
In the end, the so-called peoples summit lived up to at least half its name. It was indeed a summit, with big names preaching down at, trying desperately to herd them instead of hear them, trying to run them instead of raising up their experiences and insights, out of justifiable fear that those might lead them outside the Democratic party.
Bruce A. Dixon is managing editor at Black Agenda Report and co-chair of the Georgia Green Party. He lives and works near Marietta GA and can be reached via email at bruce.dixon@blackagendareport.com.
Sexual issues were loudly debated among anti-colonial activists in the Dutch Caribbean colonies of Curaçao and Aruba, said Chelsea Shields, a history professor at the City Universi
Black women “posed a problem” for the Black government that replaced white rule in Zimbabwe, because their bodies were thought to “disturb urban space,” said Rudo Mudiwa, a PhD in
In the political hotbed that was Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, in 1967, US Black Power advocate Stokely Carmichael, who had not yet changed his name to Kwame Ture, made both friends and enemies among th
The Black misleaders have been busy selling out Black people for half a century, but are still only barely tolerated by the rich man’s Democratic Party and its racist figurehead, Joe Biden.
The civil rights groups’ rather basic requests for voting rights protections and the need for federal intervention to address police brutality were minimized and dismissed by the president-ele
