Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Obama and Clinton: The Siamese Twins
Bill Quigley
07 Nov 2007
🖨️ Print Article

Obama and Clinton: The Siamese Twins

 A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

"Their shared Iraq
position is no different than George Bush's stated goals."

ObamaNukeBang
Barack Obama is engaged in a high-profile/low substance
effort to distance himself from Hillary Clinton on the Iraq war. It's like
watching Siamese Twins slap each other around, knowing that the two are
genetically identical and inseparable. Clinton and Obama are conjoined War
Democrats who pretend to disagree on a phrase here and there. Both intend to
stay in Iraq as long as so-called "U.S. interests" dictate. In that regard,
their shared Iraq position is no different than George Bush's stated goals.

Last week, the New York Times gave Obama acres
of space
to spin his illusory Iraq "withdrawal" plan - more space than the
newspaper has afforded Dennis Kucinich, the real peace candidate, during the
whole primary campaign. It was a waste of words, see-through clothing on a
naked body. Obama claims he doesn't plan to maintain permanent bases in Iraq.
So, by the way, do Hillary Clinton and George Bush. But Obama says he'll employ
a "broader strategic" approach than Clinton - that he won't shy away from
"talking" directly to the leaders of Iran and Syria. Sen. Clinton says she'd
have to study the matter awhile, before deciding whether to have face-to-face
meetings.

But, meetings about what? Obama and Clinton both insist
that the U.S. military reserves the right to remain in Iraq until it serves
U.S. interests to do otherwise - in Obama's words, until "we see some
stability" in the region. But, what is "stability"? Apparently, it means pacification
- just as it did in Vietnam. The "withdrawal" of which Obama speaks is
predicated on leaving behind "secure" areas - again, in his words, "so we can
afford to remove troops." And that depends on getting the "cooperation" of the
Iraqis, friend and foe alike. George Bush sings the same
song
: "When Iraqis Stand Up, We Stand Down," says Bush, bringing back an
oldie-but-goldie phrase that presidents Johnson and Nixon deployed endlessly in
Southeast Asia, two generations ago.

"Like Bush and Clinton,
Obama refuses to take any military options ‘off the table.'"

Obama assured the New York Times that he doesn't
intend to stay in Iraq forObamaWarning another "ten or twenty years" - that is, if those
pesky Iraqis just act right. If they don't, all bets are off. Here's a
definitive quote from the candidate: "I will remove all our combat troops, we
will have troops there to protect our embassies and our civilian forces and we
will engage in counter terrorism activities," said Obama. However, he
continues, "How large that force is, whether it's located inside Iraq or as an
over the horizon force is going to depend on what our military situation is."

In other words, Iraq will have to be pacified for Obama's
14-to-15 month, piecemeal and totally iffy "withdrawal" plan to take place.
Hillary Clinton won't even mention anything smacking of a timetable, but that
really doesn't make a difference, since Obama's schedule depends on achievement
of some kind of U.S. "victory" before withdrawal - which is George Bush's
stated scenario, as well. Like Bush and Clinton, Obama refuses to take any
military options "off the table," including nuclear options. Although Obama is
less rhetorically bullying than Bush, and more charming than Clinton, all three
reserve the right to launch a first strike against Iran. This is the language
of war criminals.

It seems our problem is not the Siamese Twins, Obama and
Clinton, but Siamese Triplets, Hillary, Barack and Bush.

For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • BRICS Expansion is Positive – But Not a Coherent Challenge to US Power
    Morning Star Online
    BRICS Expansion is Positive – But Not a Coherent Challenge to US Power
    30 Aug 2023
    The expansion of the BRICS beyond Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa is an important development but not one that will challenge U.S. efforts at domination.
  • Black Agenda Radio August 25, 2023
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    Black Agenda Radio August 25, 2023
    25 Aug 2023
    Impending Haiti occupation and Black face imperialism, attacks on abortion and reproductive rights, how the climate crisis impacts Black people.
  • Haiti Under Attack from Imperialism in Black Face
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    Haiti Under Attack from Imperialism in Black Face
    25 Aug 2023
    Austin Cole joins us to talk about the Black Alliance for Peace Haiti/Americas Team efforts to mobilize against the impending occupation of Haiti which will use African and Caribbean nations to do U.…
  • Attacks on Abortion and Reproductive Rights Harm Black Women
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    Attacks on Abortion and Reproductive Rights Harm Black Women
    25 Aug 2023
    Qiana Arnold is a birth justice associate and a full spectrum doula at Support Your Sistah at the Afiya Center in Dallas, Texas.
  • The Climate Crisis, Part 1
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    The Climate Crisis, Part 1
    25 Aug 2023
    Forrest Palmer is a native of Los Angeles, California who is now an electrical engineer residing in Houston, Texas.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us