Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Obama To Leave 50,000 Troops In Iraq Indefinitely
Bill Quigley
04 Mar 2009
šŸ–Øļø Print Article

Click the flash player above to hear this Black Agenda Radio commentary, or click here to download an mp3 copy.

rrrA Black Agenda Radio Commentary by Glen Ford

From a supposed "antiwar" candidate, to a fan of the murderous "surge," from a "no permanent bases" candidate to a "50,000 troops for the foreseeable future" president, Barack Obama, starting from the center, has progressed steadily rightward.

Obama To Leave 50,000 Troops in Iraq Indefinitely

A Black Agenda Radio Commentary by Glen Ford

With the turn of a phrase, President Obama has placed himself to the Right of his own party.ā€

Barack Obama, who was never an anti-war candidate, reveals himself as a pro-war president who would rather mangle the English language than tell the truth. Obama and his generals are agreed that the U.S. should leave about 50,000 U.S. troops in Iraq after the targeted withdrawal of so-called ā€œcombatā€ troops by the end of August, 2010. So, what are we supposed to call these 50,000 American military personnel, if they are not ā€œcombatā€ troops? Obama wants us to call them a ā€œtransition forceā€ – presumably, they will transition to death anyone that opposes them. Obama thinks that by changing the nomenclature, he can announce ā€œmission accomplished,ā€ declare peace, and then keep the war going indefinitely. That’s why the Joint Chiefs of Staff are happy, John McCain is happy,http://www.blackagendareport.com/images/stories/128/FAIRarticle.jpg but Democratic congressional leadership is anything but happy. With the turn of a phrase, President Obama has placed himself to the Right of his own party, and stabbed all of his wishful anti-war supporters in the back.

When it comes to torturing the language, Obama is more shameless than Vietnam-era presidents, who persisted in calling U.S. troops fighting in that country ā€œadvisorsā€ until the term became laughable. As much as they would like to, the American generals in Iraq and their commander-in-chief can’t call the 50,000 soldiers and Marines that are to remain behind ā€œadvisorsā€ – there are far too many of them, and they will continue to be organized for combat at the drop of a hat. Instead, the name-game describes the troops as a ā€œtransitionā€ force, as opposed to a combat force. Which doesn’t mean they won’t be in combat; on the contrary, armed Americans in full battle gear will be roaming around looking for targets and fighting alongside the Iraqi military. It will look and sound just like combat; people on both sides and civilians will be killed, just like in combat, but it will not be combat because President Obama says the mission is ā€œtransition.ā€ After August of 2010, U.S. soldiers and Marines in Iraq will be engaged in ā€œtransitioning,ā€ not combat.

ā€œObama has spoken. Semantics equals reality.ā€

Obama is worried that many people may not be sophisticated enough to understand the fine distinction between combat soldiering and ā€œtransitioning.ā€
 
"Let me say this as plainly as I can,ā€ Obama told Marines at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, last weekend. ā€œBy August 31, 2010,ā€ Obama said with a straight face, ā€œour combat mission in Iraq will end." Why? Because Obama chooses not to call it combat.  Obama has spoken. Semantics equals reality.
 
Which makes you wonder: what kind of semantic trick was Obama playing when he told the joint session of congress, ā€œI can stand here tonight and say without exception or equivocation that the United States of America does not torture?" If methodically killing people is not combat, then maybe the methodical infliction of physical and emotional pain isn’t always torture. Maybe torture, like combat, is in the eye of the beholder – or, more to the point, the Presidential Definer, the Semanticist-in-Chief.
 
Apparently, when Barack Obama promised change, he meant a change in definitions.
 
For Black Agenda Radio, I’m Glen Ford. On the web, go to www.BlackAgendaReport.com.
 
BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • Freedom Rider: Rebellion, Confusion, Scoundrels and Kente Cloth
    Margaret Kimberley, BAR senior columnist
    Freedom Rider: Rebellion, Confusion, Scoundrels and Kente Cloth
    10 Jun 2020
    Black rebellion brings insecurity to those in power, as editors, mayors and even long dead criminals are being called to account.
  • A Tale of Two Protests: Why the U.S. Ruling Class Loves Hong Kong Protests But Hates the Minneapolis-Led Rebellion
    Danny Haiphong, BAR Contributing Editor
    A Tale of Two Protests: Why the U.S. Ruling Class Loves Hong Kong Protests But Hates the Minneapolis-Led Rebellion
    10 Jun 2020
    The protests in Hong Kong are led by an assortment of US-backed proxies who have separation from China as their principle goal.
  • How Did Two Beloved Members of Louisville’s Black Community Die Under Police Fire?
    Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor
    How Did Two Beloved Members of Louisville’s Black Community Die Under Police Fire?
    10 Jun 2020
    Without justification, Louisville cops snuffed out the lives of Breonna Taylor and David McAtee, drawing that city into the national vortex of protest.
  • low Barr Limbo
    Raymond Nat Turner, BAR poet-in-residence
    low Barr Limbo
    10 Jun 2020
    He so wide you can’t go ā€˜round him He so low you can’t go under him He so low that when he go High an ant can’t get under him; a rattlesnake’s shake’s 
  • Community Control Vs. Defunding the Police: A Critical Analysis
    Max Rameau and Netfa Freeman
    Community Control Vs. Defunding the Police: A Critical Analysis
    10 Jun 2020
    Defunding the police might end the armed and uniformed force as we know it, but the ruling class will then hire mercenaries to protect their wealth and enforce their will.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us