Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

U.S. Risks Catastrophic Defeat in Pakistan
Glen Ford, BAR executive editor
17 Sep 2008
🖨️ Print Article

U.S. Risks Catastrophic Defeat in PakistanPakistaniSoldier

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

"The Americans dare to
violate the territory and insult the dignity of a nuclear-armed nation of 170
million people, most of whom despise the United States."

From the moment the United States decided to remove the
Taliban regime from Afghanistan, Washington has been in a twilight kind of war
with Pakistan. Now, with American troops openly violating Pakistani territory
in direct defiance of explicit warnings from the Pakistani military high
command, the U.S. risks provoking a crisis in the Pakistani armed forces and
society that may well force the Americans to evacuate the entire region in
disarray.

The Americans seem to think that if Pashtun tribesmen who
live on both sides of the Afghan/Pakistan border can cross back and forth to
fight the Americans, then the Americans have the right to do the same thing.
Wrong. Once again, the Americans show only contempt for those who choose to
become allies of Washington - against the wishes of their own people. The U.S.
thinks it has bought the permanent obedience of the Pakistani military through
decades of multi-billion dollar weapons deals and bribes. The Americans delude
themselves into believing that their alliance with the Pakistanis and the
Saudis in the jihad against the Soviets in Afghanistan two decades ago is a tie
that binds more tightly than blood, language, culture and Pakistani national
self-interest. The Americans, in their fatal, racist arrogance, dare to violate
the territory and insult the dignity of a nuclear-armed nation of 170 million
people, most of whom despise the United States.

"The Pakistani people
would doubtless approve of their soldiers standing up to the U.S."

The Taliban  was
created by Pakistan's intelligence services so that Pakistan would be the
dominant influence in Afghan affairs. After 9/11, the U.S. gave Pakistan an
ultimatum: join in a new jihad against Al Qaida and its Taliban protectors, or
become a target of the "War on Terror" - an offer the Pakistanis felt they
could not seem to refuse. But the Americans were actually demanding more than
the Pakistani military could possibly give. Pakistan's generals ruled, not by
popular consent, but through constant deal-making and intrigue among the country's
many ethnic and class constituencies. Its Inter Service Intelligence (ISI)
component is the chief mechanism of intrigue among the various military
factions. The ISI fathered the Taliban, and engineered its rise to power in
Afghanistan. The Americans were asking the Pakistani military to kill its own
political offspring.

As events have shown, the Pakistani military were
unwilling to sacrifice their own creation on Washington's demand. The Pushtun
tribesmen on both sides of the border were quite willing to fight both the
Americans and the Pakistani Army, if need be. The harder the Americans pushed,
the bigger Pakistan's Taliban problem became.

Now the Americans push across the border. The Pakistani
military says, No, and some units have reportedly fired on U.S. troops. The
Pakistani people would doubtless approve of their soldiers standing up to the
U.S. The Pew Research organization reports that only
15 percent
of Pakistanis have a favorable view of the United States, and
just 13 percent support America's so-called "War on Terror." Osama bin Laden is
infinitely more
popular
than George Bush.

If the United States provokes Pakistan any further, the
consequences are incalculable. At the very least, the U.S. may wind up being
run out of South Asia on a rail - and soon.

For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford.

Broadcasters
and others who need a downloadable MP3 copy of this Black Agenda
Radio commentary may get it from the Black Agenda Radio archive
page
.

 

 

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted
at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • The Fight to Protect an African Cemetery in Bethesda, Maryland
    Black Agenda Radio , Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    The Fight to Protect an African Cemetery in Bethesda, Maryland
    16 Dec 2022
    Dr. Marsha Coleman-Adebayo is a longtime contributor to Black Agenda Report and the author of No Fear: A Whistelebower’s Triumph Over Corruption and Retaliation at the EPA. She is also the founder of…
  • Cuba and Black Liberation
    Black Agenda Radio , Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    Cuba and Black Liberation
    16 Dec 2022
    Lee Robinson is President of the African Awareness Association. He joins us to discuss that organization’s work, Cuba's role in liberation movement, and a tour to Cuba which will take place in…
  • The Supreme Court Will Rule on Moore v. Harper
    Black Agenda Radio , Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    The Supreme Court Will Rule on Moore v. Harper
    16 Dec 2022
    The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Moore v. Harper, a case brought by North Carolina legislators who argue for the discredited “independent state legislature” theory. Eliza Sweren-Becker…
  • Brittney Griner and the U.S. State
    Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
    Brittney Griner and the U.S. State
    14 Dec 2022
    Brittney Griner's ordeal in Russia is over. But she has been secreted away for "reintegration" and the U.S. continues its own brand of international hostage taking.
  • ESSAY: Negroes Speak of War, Langston Hughes, 1933
    Editors, The Black Agenda Review
    ESSAY: Negroes Speak of War, Langston Hughes, 1933
    14 Dec 2022
    What benefits do Black folk get by endorsing or participating in the white man’s war? Revisiting an anti-war statement by Langston Hughes.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us