Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Thousands to Leave Prison Early on Crack Convictions – But That's Still Not Justice
02 Nov 2011
🖨️ Print Article

 

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

Around 12,000 inmates will get out of prison immediately or early due to retroactive application of a law to adjust sentences for crack cocaine possession – but no thanks to Obama's top lawyer. “Attorney General Eric Holder argued that less than half the inmates – only about 5,500 – should be allowed early release.” Crack is still 18 times more punishable than powdered cocaine, which is why 85 percent of federal crack convicts are Black. “The crack cocaine disparity is a legalistic expression of a racial slander, that Blacks are inherently more prone to violence.”

Thousands to Leave Prison Early on Crack Charges – But That's Still Not Justice

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

“Around 12,000 men and women should get some of their lives back – starting right now for nearly 1,900 of them.”

November 1 was a very good day for thousands of Americans, 85 percent of them Black. That’s the date when a 2010 law that reduced the disparity between sentences for crack and powder cocaine possession was made retroactive, making some inmates eligible for immediate release and knocking years off the prison time for many others. The Federal Bureau of Prisons has been processing requests for early release from prosecutors, judges and public defenders across the country. Around 12,000 men and women should get some of their lives back – starting right now for nearly 1,900 of them.

The bad news is, the sentence reductions only apply to federal prisoners. Most drug offenders, including for crack, are held in state prisons – but we’ll get to that, a little later.

When Congress passed the Fair Sentencing Act, last year, it reduced the sentencing disparity for crack and powder cocaine from the previous 100 to 1 ratio, to 18 to 1. That ain’t justice, but it was all that the legislature of a profoundly racist country would allow. The change applied immediately to all newly arrested persons, but did not retroactively reduce the prison terms of those already convicted. Then, this summer, the U.S. Sentencing Commission decided to apply the law to those already serving time – unless Congress decided otherwise before November 1. Congress wasn’t deciding much of anything this session, but Attorney General Eric Holder argued that less than half the inmates – only about 5,500 – should be allowed early release. Holder wanted to keep behind bars those he described as having significant criminal histories, or who possessed weapons while committing their crimes of drug possession. The Sentencing Commission disagreed, believing that Holder was employing the same presumptive reasoning as lawmakers did when they passed the 1986 Anti-Drug Abuse Act that mandated the same sentence for 5 grams of crack as for 500 grams of powdered cocaine. The assumption was that crack was an inherently more violence-producing drug than its chemically identical powdered form. Holder seemed to be saying the same thing in 2011, and so the Sentencing Commission rejected his argument. About 6,500 inmates are glad they did.

“Holder wanted to keep behind bars those he described as having significant criminal histories, or who possessed weapons while committing their crimes of drug possession.”

But that’s just a drop in the bucket, for the vast American prison gulag. Most crack prisoners are held in state facilities. Thirteen states still discriminate between crack and powdered cocaine. According to a report of the Sentencing Project called “Cracked Justice,” Missouri hands down mandatory 10-year sentences for six grams of crack, the same as for 450 grams of powder – a 75 to 1 disparity. Oklahoma enforces a 6 to 1 ratio for a minimum ten years for 5 grams of crack. Arizona’s disparity is 12 to 1, and less than one gram of crack will get you five years in prison.

The same logic prevails now as back in 1986: that crack is a more violent substance than powder. We all know, of course, that the crime is actually judged by who is holding the dope, not the dope itself. The crack cocaine disparity is a legalistic expression of a racial slander, that Blacks are inherently more prone to violence. It is a logic that much of the Congressional Black Caucus bought into, in 1986, and that the Black U.S. Attorney General behaves as if he believes, today. The national policy of mass Black incarceration could not long continue if it did not have lots of Black collaborators, in high places and low.

For Black Agenda Radio, I’m Glen Ford. On the web, go to BlackAgendaReport.com.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.



Your browser does not support the audio element.

listen
http://traffic.libsyn.com/blackagendareport/20111102_gf_CrackCocaine.mp3

More Stories


  • There’s No Such Thing as a “Progressive Prosecutor” in a System Designed to Criminalize Blackness
    Gyasi Lake
    There’s No Such Thing as a “Progressive Prosecutor” in a System Designed to Criminalize Blackness
    17 Jul 2019
    Incremental changes are treated as if they are touchdowns when they are just moving the chains.
  • Why Are So Many Black Families Losing Their Land?
    Lizzie Presser
    Why Are So Many Black Families Losing Their Land?
    17 Jul 2019
    The Reels brothers spent eight years in jail for refusing to leave their plot of land in North Carolina.
  • Detroit Targeted for Massive Facial Surveillance
    Shea Howell
    Detroit Targeted for Massive Facial Surveillance
    17 Jul 2019
    A Black elected police commissioner was manhandled at a public meeting for protesting a draconian facial recognition scheme.
  • Letters from Our Readers 
    Jahan Chowdhry, BAR Comments Editor
    Letters from Our Readers 
    17 Jul 2019
    This week we discuss Bernie Sanders candidacy, the Socialism 2019 conference, and Russiagate.  You will find your comments on “
  • BAR Book Forum: Ron Ridenour’s “The Russian Peace Threat”
    Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
    BAR Book Forum: Ron Ridenour’s “The Russian Peace Threat”
    17 Jul 2019
    Seventy years of US savagery in the world prove the need for solidarity with all movements against repression, inequality, war and capitalism,
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us