Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Armstrong Williams Wants “Diversity” Favor from FCC
02 Apr 2014
🖨️ Print Article

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by executive editor Glen Ford

Sometime in the late Seventies, the Black political class decided that ownership of media was more important than making programming that is accountable to the African American public. Today, Blacks neither own nor control the TV programming they consume. Except for Armstrong Williams, the “rightwing propagandist and hustler” who wants the FCC to favor him with a diversity ruling.

Armstrong Williams Wants “Diversity” Favor from FCC

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by executive editor Glen Ford

“Williams claims that he is known to provide broadcast content that reflects a minority perspective.”

The Federal Communications Commission this week dealt at least a potential blow to the monopolists who have sucked every drop of social value out of American commercial television. The FCC ruled that TV stations that sell substantial portions of other TV stations advertizing, are the real owners of the station, and thus are violating rules against multiple ownerships in the same market. The practice of joint advertizing has meant that many stations are little more than shells for getting around the rules against monopolization. The National Association of Black Journalists applauds the FCC action, since shared advertizing agreements usually mean firing the whole newsroom of one of the stations. The Minority Media and Telecommunications Council supports the ruling, because the shared advertizing game only helps the media giants eat up the smaller guys.

One person who’s not happy is Armstrong Williams, the Black rightwing propagandist and hustler who calls himself a journalist. Williams owns two stations that are essentially extra channels for stations already owned by Sinclair Broadcasting, which is the largest operator of non-network affiliated stations in the country. Williams claims that Black people in Flint, Michigan, and Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, will suffer if he loses his stations there, since he is known to provide broadcast content that reflects a minority perspective. Now, that’s a joke! Armstrong Williams, whose mentor was South Carolina’s rabidly racist Sen. Strom Thurmond, has never uttered or written a word that was relevant to the hopes and dreams of most Black people. In political terms, Armstrong Williams most closely resembles the character played by Samuel L. Jackson in Django Unchained.

“The fact that the owner is Black doesn’t affect the stations’ broadcast schedules and program content one bit.”

But, more importantly, there is nothing on his TV stations that distinguishes them from any other corporate money machine. In Myrtle Beach, it’s a long day of Jerry Springer and People’s Court and Friends reruns, with news at 10 provided by a network owned by CBS and Warner Bros. In Michigan, his station is just another NBC affiliate, spewing the same bland corporate crap. The fact that the owner is Black doesn’t affect the stations’ broadcast schedules and program content one bit. It’s still garbage, of no socially redeeming value. Program-wise, it’s not even Black garbage.

Black people have no reason to be concerned about the survival of television stations that do not substantially serve their interests. It is true that Armstrong Williams has as much right as any white person to get rich from poisoning the airwaves – but that does not mean that we have to help him. And in fact, the airwaves still technically belong to the public. The government is obligated by law to ensure that the broadcast spectrum is put to uses that best serve the public. That means programming that is accountable to the public, including Black people.

There was a time when the FCC at least pretended to take public input seriously. The very fact that, two generations ago, the Black public could challenge the licenses of stations that ignored, abused or simply underserved them, created wondrous opportunities for intra-Black communications – opportunities that have been wiped out by corporate consolidation.

The FCC may well make an exception to its own joint advertizing ruling, on “diversity” grounds. And, that would be a victory – for Armstrong Williams. However, Black people as a whole will have won nothing, and lost a great deal.

For Black Agenda Radio, I’m Glen Ford. On the web, go to BlackAgendaReport.com.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.



Your browser does not support the audio element.

listen
http://traffic.libsyn.com/blackagendareport/20140402_gf_FCC.mp3

More Stories


  • BAR Book Forum: Jennifer Bajorek’s “Unfixed”
    Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
    BAR Book Forum: Jennifer Bajorek’s “Unfixed”
    07 Oct 2020
    Through photography, the author asks questions about the meaning and nature of liberation.
  • When Police Violence is a Dog Bite
    Abbie Vansickle
    When Police Violence is a Dog Bite
    07 Oct 2020
    In some jurisdiction police dogs only bite Black people, but only a few that are mauled by dogs get justice.
  • Jalil Muntaqim Scheduled for Release from Prison
    Judy Greenspan
    Jalil Muntaqim Scheduled for Release from Prison
    07 Oct 2020
    Muntaqim is one of the longest-held political prisoners in the world. “Both his age and serious medical conditions made him vulnerable to the coronavirus.”
  • Eyewitness to the Agony of Julian Assange
    Timothy Erik Strom and John Pilger
    Eyewitness to the Agony of Julian Assange
    07 Oct 2020
    The defendant was caged behind thick glass, and had to crawl on his knees to a slit in the glass to make contact with his lawyers.
  • An Indian Perspective on the Covid-19 Epidemic
    Prabir Purkayastha
    An Indian Perspective on the Covid-19 Epidemic
    07 Oct 2020
    The pandemic shows the contradictions between the needs of capitalism and the health of the people.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us