Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Does President Obama Want To Turn Syria Into Somalia? Maybe.
04 Sep 2013
🖨️ Print Article

A Black Agenda Radio Commentary by BAR managing editor Bruce A. Dixon

When it comes to Syria, President Obama is no abider of laws foreign or domestic, and no peacemaker either. The US won't share its supposed evidence of Syrian nerve gas use with anybody, and its threatened US military strikes can only widen and prolong the proxy war. The US may intend to reduce Syria to the same state permanent state of war, chaos and misery as it engineered in Somalia.

Does President Obama Want To Turn Syria Into Somalia? Maybe.

A Black Agenda Radio Commentary by BAR managing editor Bruce A. Dixon

Presidents say lots of stuff we simply cannot take seriously. Anything about peace, jobs, human rights, or protecting the “middle class,” to name just a few, is pretty much bound to be nonsense and lies. Examples abound. But when presidents tell us up front they intend to break the law they just about always do, so we really should believe them.

President Obama says that although he'll consult with Congress first this time, as president he can and will bomb Syria or anyplace else he likes without the congressional declaration of war that Article 1 Section 8 of the US Constitution requires. In other words, the president, a former constitutional law professor, reserves the “right” to violate the Constitution and wage illegal war at his discretion.

The president's war violates international standards as well. Under international law the only justifiable wars are in response to an attack, or with the authorization of the UN security council. Syria certainly has not attacked the US, and since the White House will not share its supposed “evidence” of Syrian government attacks on civilians with international inspectors hired by the UN, everybody is just supposed to take Uncle Sam's word for it, pretty much like they had to about Saddam's weapons of mass destruction. Look how nicely that turned out. Even the Brits, who've never been squeamish about shooting up and invading other countries, are not with the lawless Obama administration on this one.

Masters of saying one thing and doing another, the president and secretary of state are savvy enough to mumble that “only a political solution, not a military one” will stick in Syria. Although a rain of cruise missiles and drone bombs can kneecap the Syrian armed forces which seem to be holding their own now against US and Saudi-sponsored fighters, it can only make peace talks less likely. And the US really doesn't trust its own Saudi-sponsored thugs to actually run a Syrian government, in the unlikely event the Syrian people would allow it. So what many believe the US prefers, many believe, is a permanent state of low-grade civil war in Syria with neither side winning.

President Obama wants to turn Syria into Somalia where since the US can't install the regime it wants, it has prevented any central government from functioning since the landing of US Marines in a “humanitarian intervention” in the final minutes of the first Bush administration.

For the last 20 years, more than a million Somalis, one out of ten have died of hunger and violence, while US sponsored warlords and US sponsored invading armies from Ethiopia and Kenya have swept across the landscape. There's no Somali government to build schools or hospitals, to hire teachers or doctors, to repair or run electric grids, water works, agricultural or public health programs, so none of these things exist. Somalis civilians are barefoot, sick, hungry and afraid, cowering under a rain of drone bombs. Somalia's only products are refugees and misery, and the country's only industry is its permanent war, an excuse for the US and its client thugs to never leave. Ever. That's what President Obama means by “a political solution.”

For Black Agenda Radio I'm Bruce Dixon. Find us on the web at www.blackagendareport.com.

Bruce A. Dixon is managing editor at Black Agenda Report, and a member of the state committee of the GA Green Party. Contact him via this site's contact page, or at bruce.dixon(at)blackagendareport.com.

 



Your browser does not support the audio element.

listen
http://traffic.libsyn.com/blackagendareport/20130904_bd_syria-into-somila.mp3

More Stories


  •  BAR Book Forum: Lorgia GarcĂ­a Peña’s Book, “Translating Blackness”
    Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
    BAR Book Forum: Lorgia García Peña’s Book, “Translating Blackness”
    01 Mar 2023
    This week’s featured author is Lorgia García Peña. Peña is Professor of Latinx Studies at Tufts University. Her book is Translating Blackness: Latinx Colonialities in Global Perspective.
  • Political Repression Under Peruvian Coup Regime
    Clau O'Brien Moscoso
    Political Repression Under Peruvian Coup Regime
    01 Mar 2023
    The people of Peru continue to protest the coup which ousted President Pedro Castillo Terrones. Clau O'Brien Moscoso reports from Peru.
  • War Over U.S. Military Base Quest in Somalia Rages On
    Jamal Abdulahi
    War Over U.S. Military Base Quest in Somalia Rages On
    01 Mar 2023
    A conflict between Somali unionists and secessionists was spawned by a U.S. attempt to acquire a military base. War and a humanitarian crisis are the end result.
  • Africans’ Message to Imperialism: “We Are Not Your Flunkies!”
    Mark P. Fancher
    Africans’ Message to Imperialism: “We Are Not Your Flunkies!”
    01 Mar 2023
    South Africa's participation in military drills with Russia and China is an indication that the global south are not taking orders from Washington. African nations should continue their…
  • US Hegemony and Its Perils
    Ministry of Foreign Affairs People's Republic of China
    US Hegemony and Its Perils
    01 Mar 2023
    The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China spells out what is wrong with U.S. foreign policy. While administrations may change, the imperative to dominate doesn't. U.…
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us