Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

A Police State for Black and Brown New Yorkers
19 May 2010
🖨️ Print Article

 A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

New York's finest at workThere is no advice Black and brown parents can give their children to avoid being stopped and frisked by New York City police. Cops last year stopped almost half a million non-whites on the streets based on “furtive movements,” appearing to “case” a person or location, or for reasons explained only as “other.” Apparently, Blacks are nine times as “furtive,” felonious-looking, or “other”-wise threatening, as whites.
 
A Police State for Black and Brown New Yorkers
A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford
“Stop-and-frisks have reached astronomical heights – increasing five-fold under the current police commissioner – on direct orders of City Hall.”
A full-blown police state exists in New York City. It is not the result of a crime wave; crime has been on the decline for decades, as successive city administrations proudly boast. The New York police state has been methodically constructed by the city administration to create an environment of fear and intimidation in Black and brown neighborhoods. Last year the racist police state juggernaut swept up nearly half a million African American and Latino New Yorkers, while affecting only 53,000 whites.
A Center for Constitutional Rights' lawsuit forced the city to begin keeping racial data on police activity following the 1999 police killing of Amadou Diallou. The latest data show that Blacks are nine times as likely to be stopped and frisked as whites. And these are anything but polite police procedures; in about one out of four cases, police draw their weapons or throw people to the ground. Still, only about six percent of the stops result in a formal arrest. In other words, in three out of four cases in which cops draw their weapons or use violence against New Yorkers on the street, in involves totally innocent persons, unworthy of arrest. Police used force against only 19 percent of whites, but against 27 percent of Blacks. Those whites that are among the very small proportion stopped by police are slightly more likely to be arrested than Blacks, and one-and-a-half times more likely to be carrying a weapon.
The Center for Constitutional Rights concludes, as would any sane observer, that the stop-and-frisk numbers reflect racial bias, and that they are flagrantly unconstitutional. It is equally clear that stop-and-frisks have reached astronomical heights – increasing five-fold under the current police commissioner – on direct orders of City Hall. The pace of unjustifiable stops has become too fast and furious even for some street cops. The Village Voice newspaper is publishing a series of articles based on secret police recordings of supervisors as they impose relentless and escalating quotas for stops and petty summonses on residents in Black and brown Brooklyn.
“In nearly half the cases, cops claim they stopped a pedestrian because he was making ‘furtive movements.’”
This has nothing to do with crime, and everything to do with enforcement of a racist social order.
The cops claim that they are simply exercising their right to stop people based on “reasonable suspicion.” But of course, white racism has its own system of reasoning, its own logic – it even invents or imagines its own facts. Police fill out forms to list the “facts” as they see them, after every stop-and-frisk on the street, as required by New York City law. In nearly half the cases, cops claim they stopped a pedestrian because he was making “furtive movements.” What are “furtive movements”? Apparently, whatever the police think or imagine they are. The second biggest excuse for frisking people – listed in 30 percent of the stops – is that they were “casing a victim or location.” In other words, the cop could just look at the subject and see that he had felonious intentions – that criminal “look” about him. In 19 percent of the cases, the cops don't even bother to be specific about why they made the person a target of the state; they simply check “other” as the reason.
Why has New York created a police state for Blacks and Latinos? Because the powers-that-be think that a voting majority of citizens approve, and because Black and brown leadership are in the pockets of those in power. For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford. On the web, go to www.BlackAgendaReport.com.
BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.

More Stories


  • Charisse Burden-Stelly, PhD
    Harry Haywood, Black People, and the 2024 U.S. Election
    27 Nov 2024
    Harry Haywood’s work is a guiding light to help Black people analyze our position in the U.S. and rethink how we might engage in electoral politics. Are we building power toward revolution or are we…
  • Black Alliance for Peace US Out of Africa Network
    Report: The Anti-Imperialist Upsurge in the Sahel and the Historic Conference in Niamey
    27 Nov 2024
    The Black Alliance for Peace and U.S. Out of Africa Network provided this report following their participation in the “Conference in Solidarity with the Peoples of the Sahel”.
  • Phil Wilayto
    Crisis & Cover-up at Red Onion Super-Max
    27 Nov 2024
    Red Onion Prison in Virginia has the same history of racism, brutal violence, and inhumane conditions that characterize the entire mass incarceration system. But recently men held there in…
  • Keston K Perry
    The IMF and the World Bank Must be Abolished to Save the Planet
    27 Nov 2024
    The IMF and the World Bank give the appearance of aiding Global South nations with economic relief for climate disasters, but in reality, they are burdening them with more debt. 
  • Tamara Nassar , Ali Abunimah
    AOC votes to back Israel lobby’s bogus “anti-Semitism” definition
    27 Nov 2024
    New York's "progressive" congresswoman panders to the Israel lobby by supporting a definition of antisemitism that will stifle free speech.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us