Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Americans Tip Their Hand on Iraq Oil
21 Feb 2007
🖨️ Print Article

Americans Tip Their Hand on Iraq Oil

 
 

"If a nation's government cannot influence the export and price of its most vital commodity, then that nation is no longer sovereign."

 
 

OilScapeGOOD The latest version of the proposed Iraq oil law, drawn up by Americans and now before the cabinet of the Iraqi government, is a document like none other on the planet. Essentially, it would eliminate the Iraqi central government's role in guiding the development of the nation's most precious asset, oil. Instead, various regions and sub-regions would line up to offer multinational corporations the best terms for oil exploration and drilling deals; in other words, Iraqis would be compelled to underbid each other in a process that can only result in huge advantages to the oil companies. Indeed the law seems designed to encourage the dismemberment of Iraq, with every region free to pursue its own deals with foreigners. If ever there were a law that embodied the principle of "divide and rule," it's this one.

 
 

The proposed law would allow oil companies to lock Iraqis into 35-year agreements, and would forbid the central government from deciding how much oil is pumped out of Iraqi soil. That means Iraq, the second or third largest reservoir of oil in the world, could no longer be a part of OPEC, the organization of oil-producing countries, whose main reason for existing is to regulate oil supplies and, thereby, the price of oil on the world market. If a nation's government cannot influence the export and price of its most vital commodity, then that nation is no longer sovereign.

 
 

"Having failed to make Iraq a de facto colony of the United States, the Americans believe that divide and rule is the next best thing."

 
 

But of course, the Iraqi government is not sovereign; it is a gaggle of factions headquartered in Baghdad's American Green Zone fortress, in the midst of a civil war in which the various factions jockey for favor with the foreign occupier. Each faction and sub-faction seeks wartime advantage through American money, weapons and favor. Having failed to make Iraq a de facto colony of the United States, the Americans believe that divide and rule is the next best thing. But even if the Iraqi cabinet OKs the American-crafted document, the law will not survive the current conflict. Whoever comes out on top will be forced to renounce the law, or face the wrath of every other Iraqi whose patrimony has been signed away to foreigners. Of that, I am certain.

 
 

In the end, the oil companies won't win this game, either. Big Oil does not prosper when chaos reaches levels that threaten the reliability of production. In the current Iraqi situation, the oil law is a recipe for endless chaos, as regions and localities and factions and sub-factions combine and divide in battles for control of scattered oil pools and processing facilities.

 
 

Multinational corporations would prefer to control the price and availability of oil, themselves. But, failing that, they would rather deal with strong national states that can guarantee order and stability. The Iraq oil law was first drawn up in U.S. corporate boardrooms when it was assumed that the overthrow of Saddam Hussein would pacify the country, allowing American oil executives to create a heaven on earth for their own profit. That dream is long gone, and the signatures on a piece of paper of Iraqi faction leaders posing as a government, cannot bring it back. If the Americans think they can achieve by legalistic trickery, that which they could not win through war, they are crazy. But then, we already knew that.

 
 

For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford.

 

BAR Executive Editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford (at) BlackAgendaReport.com.


More Stories


  • Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
    Joe Biden's Terrible Legacy
    15 Jan 2025
    The moniker “Genocide Joe” is well deserved and one that Joe Biden can never live down, along with any other names that describe the damage he brought to the country and to the world. His legacy is…
  • Editors, The Black Agenda Review
    INTERVIEW: The Problem of Haiti is the Same as Latin America: Gerard Pierre-Charles, 1983
    15 Jan 2025
    Despite selling out Haiti, former Haitian leftist Gerard Pierre-Charles’s 1983 diagnosis of the imperialist assault on current movements still resonates today.
  • Manley greets a crowd
    Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor , Riva Enteen
    Remembering Jamaica in the East/West Crossfire, Part II
    15 Jan 2025
    Both class and color barriers were broken down during the Michael Manley era, but class barriers re-emerged.
  • Sign of one of the children in the Guayaquil four
    Clau O'Brien Moscoso
    The War on Africans in Ecuador: an Interview with Uriel Castillo of MANE
    15 Jan 2025
    Over a month after the killings of four young boys in Ecuador, now known as the Guayaquil Four, the community is still reeling but is also activated. This case has sparked a movement that is…
  • Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
    BAR Book Forum: Tracy Rosenthal and Leonardo Vilchis’s Book, “Abolish Rent”
    15 Jan 2025
    In this series, we ask acclaimed authors to answer five questions about their book. This week’s featured authors are Tracy Rosenthal and Leonardo Vilchis. Their book is Abolish Rent: How Tenants Can…
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us