Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire
  • omnibus

Bob Wing’s Strategy to Build the “Anti-Racist State” to Replace the “Racist State” is Liberal Social Imperialist Nonsense
Quetzal Cáceres
02 Jun 2021
Bob Wing’s Strategy to Build the “Anti-Racist State” to Replace the “Racist State” is Liberal Social Imperialist Nonsense
Bob Wing’s Strategy to Build the “Anti-Racist State” to Replace the “Racist State” is Liberal Social Imperialist Nonsense

What Wing has done is taken an important formulation and neutered it to serve neoliberal multiculturalism.

“Wing’s formulation conveniently forgets about the rest of the world, as unfortunately many ‘anti-racists’ tend to do.”

I decided to write this piece not because Bob Wing’s formulation has any merit on its own but because a response was penned by esteemed Leftist historian Dr. Gerald Horne, which was reprinted in one of the most important Left platforms, Black Agenda Report. Because of my deep respect for Dr. Horne and BAR, I decided to take a look at Wing’s article, which was much more than a simple disappointment. It was a shocking and very troubling disappointment. Part of me wanted to ignore this matter altogether, not give Wing’s essay an iota more of attention, but readers of BAR, particularly those who may be of a younger generation, might benefit from the critique I offer.

Dr. Horne’s response focused on a particular aspect of Wing’s article— the highlighting of the US as a settler colonial white racist republic. I have no quarrel with this aspect of Wing’s article. But we should also remind ourselves that there is nothing new about this formulation. It has been articulated generally and much more effectively for a number of years now by a consensus of Indigenous scholars, by individuals such as Professor Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz, Dr. Horne himself, BAR editors, and many others. What Wing has done, however, is taken an important formulation and neutered it to serve one of the US capitalist state’s hippest and preferred modes of ideological hegemony today, neoliberal multiculturalism. It is the part of Wing’s analysis (or misanalysis) largely left out of Dr. Horne’s response which is where the trouble lies. 

“Wing’s article was much more than a simple disappointment.”

Wing is proposing a political strategy for moving forward in our era, and the objective is building what Wing calls the “anti-racist state” to replace the “racist state.” Not surprisingly, to arrive at the “anti-racist state” we need to build and support electoral victories by the Democratic Party. To be fair, Wing also states that we need to build outside of the Democratic Party through independent social movements. Of course, this is what every social democrat from Sanders to AOC says, leaving out the thorny problem that in practice these ‘independent’ movements are largely steered by appendages of the Democratic Party in the non-profit-industrial complex. 

One might never guess that Wing once identified as a Marxist because there is nothing in his analysis about a capitalist state versus a socialist state— or within the US capitalist state itself, liberal democracy being the “Good Cop,” as Dr. Gabriel Rockhill posits, to the US capitalist state’s other self, the “Bad Cop,” or fascism. Wing believes that Trump was an aberration, a turn toward fascism, but fascism is always present in the US for certain people in certain places, while others might get their liberal democracy instead. This is about the capitalist state and what it needs to survive and reproduce, and this can be different things for different people at any given time. For example, how would we describe a mass surveillance police state that constitute’s five percent of the world’s population but incarcerates twenty to twenty-five percent of the world’s prisoners, a grossly disproportionate number who are Black and Brown? Anywhere else, such a capitalist state might just be considered a fascist authoritarian state, regardless of whether there was a strong man in power or not, or whatever the government in power called itself. Within the US, the Democratic Party-controlled state of California has the most extensive prison gulag system in the entire world. 

“Wing believes that Trump was an aberration.”

Wing’s formulation of building an anti-racist state with the help of Democratic Party electoral victories conveniently forgets about the rest of the world, as unfortunately many “anti-racists” tend to do. Wing is mute on the Democratic Party’s imperialist imperative as the US exports US racism across the globe, mentioning Obama in passing and without criticism. But how can one be truly anti-racist without being in solidarity with the people of Venezuela, Cuba, the Palestinians, the peoples of US-occupied Africa? How can one not take issue with constant US bipartisan threats against China, Russia, and Iran? The US is a racist state not simply because it practices racism within its settler colonial so-called “borders” but because it is at its core an imperialist state; the expansion of the continental US was nothing less than what Dunbar-Ortiz and others refer to as “continental imperialism.” The “racist state” is simply the local iteration of the imperialist state. They are one and the same, the US capitalist state, which must  be a racist state because capitalism is racial capitalism. The notion that we can build an “anti-racist state” within the context of US capitalism/imperialism is a dangerous fantasy as we have seen most recently with ‘woke’ multicultural CIA recruitment videos.

Without irony, Wing also references the anti-Trump “resistance,” a sad trope of deluded liberals, divorcing Trumpism from the Democratic Party’s own racist policies and failures to deliver fundamental improvements to the lives of working people, instead spending trillions to kill and oppress the darker nations of the world. I will not go through the litany of Democratic Party abuses towards the masses in general and non-white people in particular, as I’ve done in a previous piece (and as BAR does on a regular basis); but if there was one individual who embodied the white, racist settler US republic, that would be Andrew Jackson, around whom the Democratic Party was founded. At some point in Wing’s imagination, it seems the Democratic Party became something other than what its political genetic code determines it must be— a racist, settler colonial, imperialist, ruling-class war party.

“The US is a racist state not simply because it practices racism within its settler colonial so-called “borders” but because it is at its core an imperialist state.”

How did Wing (and others) arrive at this nonsense? Wing is part of that generation discussed in Max Ebaum’s book Revolution in the Air, a broad array of Leftists who emerged from the sixties and seventies, sometimes referred to as the New Communist Movement. The New Communist Movement was not an organization but refers to various political formations and individuals of the aforementioned era. This informal movement extended into the eighties, where Wing’s nonsense and that of his ilk takes root. Since the Revolution didn’t happen as expected, some folks decided to focus on electoral politics, so they went all in with Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition. 

Now let me be very clear about something: I am not  saying that participating in electoral politics is reactionary. I am saying, however, that agitating to build the Democratic Party is reactionary as it necessitates political suicide for the Left. Perhaps this was not clear in the eighties, as I’m sure many Leftists had good intentions. But in the thirty plus years since the demise of Jesse Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition, the lessons now cannot be any clearer. The Democratic Party (dark faces in high places notwithstanding) has moved decisively to the right— not the left— and along with its Republican brethren has intensified the attack on working people through austerity, police violence, mass incarceration, impoverishment, debt, and war. Only a party with a socialist orientation and truly independent of the corporate duopoly can represent and fight for the interests of working people. The political theater and political failure of Sanders and AOC are constant reminders of this. 

“Agitating to build the Democratic Party is reactionary as it necessitates political suicide for the Left.”

It would have been one thing to support the Jesse Jackson campaign, and then move on and organize outside the Democratic Party, accept that the Left does not, and cannot, coopt a capitalist party; the Democratic Party does the coopting. But for some there seems to be a strange and stagnant nostalgia in the air, a bankruptcy and laziness of political intellect, a desire to run it back— Jackson’s Rainbow Coalition 2.0— maybe this time they can get it right. At the end of the day, however, personal or political motives become irrelevant. Wing and others will dutifully sheepdog those with anti-racist politics or progressive leanings into the Democratic Party. A sheepdog is a sheepdog, not because of its thoughts or aspirations— but because of what it does.

Quetzal Cáceres is a Xicanx educator and socialist living in Yanga (Los Angeles), land of the indigenous Tongva people.

COMMENTS?

Please join the conversation on Black Agenda Report's Facebook page at http://facebook.com/blackagendareport

Or, you can comment by emailing us at [email protected]

duopoly

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles. Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


Related Stories

Democratic Party Betrayal, Abortion, and the Supreme Court
Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
Democratic Party Betrayal, Abortion, and the Supreme Court
08 December 2021
Democrats have been fooled into thinking that only the courts can protect abortion rights.
Elections and the Illusion of Black Political Power
Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
Elections and the Illusion of Black Political Power
03 November 2021
Black politicians may be openly conservative or pretend leftists but their constituents rarely get what they need.
Biden is No FDR  and Build Back Better Legislation Proves It
​​​​​​​ Ajamu Baraka, BAR editor and columnist
Biden is No FDR and Build Back Better Legislation Proves It
27 October 2021
The idea that Joe Biden is the "most progressive president since FDR" is a propaganda device meant to quiet the Democratic Party left and force
Senators Bonnie and Clyde - 1% soldiers of fortune
Raymond Nat Turner, BAR poet-in-residence
Senators Bonnie and Clyde - 1% soldiers of fortune
27 October 2021
                                                                                                        Senators Bonnie and Clyde—
Some provisions of Biden’s “Build Back Better” legislation benefit the masses of Black people, but this legislation is a bare minimum effort to blunt some of the sharpest contradictions of the system while attempting to maintain the neoliberal order.  
​​​​​​​ Ajamu Baraka, BAR editor and columnist
Build Back Better Legislation: New Keynesianism or Neoliberal Public Relations Stunt?
06 October 2021
Some provisions of Biden’s “Build Back Better” legislation benefit the masses of Black people, but this legislation is a bare minimum effort to
Democrats, Abortion and Phony Politics
Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
Democrats, Abortion and Phony Politics
08 September 2021
Democratic party leadership are as uninterested in fighting for abortion rights as they are in addressing anything else their members need and
Criticizing the Democratic Party is not “Privileged”, It is the Duty of a Revolutionary
Danny Haiphong, BAR Contributing Editor
Criticizing the Democratic Party is not “Privileged”, It is the Duty of a Revolutionary
07 April 2021
Neither AOC nor the rest of the Squad has mounted any significant challenge to the party’s corporate leadership, despite being elected for this exa
The Obama-fication of “The Squad” Strengthens the Right at the Expense of the Left
Danny Haiphong, BAR Contributing Editor
The Obama-fication of “The Squad” Strengthens the Right at the Expense of the Left
13 January 2021
The so-called ‘progressive” model would have us wait half a dozen election cycles before taking real action on the demand for Medicare for All and
The Squad Won’t Fight Pelosi and Corporate Power
Glen Ford, BAR Executive Editor
The Squad Won’t Fight Pelosi and Corporate Power
07 January 2021
For the first time in this century, significant numbers of young people of all races are expressing raw hatred for the Democrats and denouncing “Th
What Does the Esau Revolution Despise?
Don Fitz
What Does the Esau Revolution Despise?
10 December 2020
The Democrats’ relentless suppression of the Green Party affected the mind-set of more voters than all the right-wing howls put together.

More Stories


  • INTERVIEW: Randall Robinson: Third World Advocate, 1983
    Editors, The Black Agenda Review
    INTERVIEW: Randall Robinson: Third World Advocate, 1983
    29 Mar 2023
    Remembering Randall Robinson: Black internationalist, anti-imperialist, and friend of Haiti.
  • Uganda LGBTQ Law Obscures Crimes Committed on Behalf of the U.S.
    Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
    Uganda LGBTQ Law Obscures Crimes Committed on Behalf of the U.S.
    29 Mar 2023
    Uganda's anti-LGBTQ legislation has elicited worldwide condemnation. But that nation's history of invading, pillaging, and killing in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, with U.S. blessings, is…
  • 2023 Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza Democracy and Peace Prize Awarded to John Williams Ntwali and Kambale Musavuli
    Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor
    2023 Victoire Ingabire Umuhoza Democracy and Peace Prize Awarded to John Williams Ntwali and Kambale Musavuli
    29 Mar 2023
    The Victoire Ingabere Umuhoza Prize for Democracy and Peace is awarded to people who work for democracy, peace, and freedom in the Great Lakes Region of Africa.
  • Saturday Mornings
    Raymond Nat Turner, BAR poet-in-residence
    Saturday Mornings
    29 Mar 2023
                                                                                                                        Saturday Mornings                                              
  •  BAR Book Forum: Hugo ka Canham’s Book, “Riotous Deathscapes”
    Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
    BAR Book Forum: Hugo ka Canham’s Book, “Riotous Deathscapes”
    29 Mar 2023
    This week’s featured author is Hugo ka Canham. Canham is Associate Professor of Psychology at the University of the Witwatersrand and coeditor of Black Academic Voices: The South African Experience.…
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us