Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

South Africa: Facebook is Still Censoring Black Activists
Thabi Myeni
06 Dec 2017
🖨️ Print Article
South Africa: Facebook is Still Censoring Black Activists
South Africa: Facebook is Still Censoring Black Activists

“Black people from all over the world must come together and organize and mobilize against Facebook, on Facebook.”

A few months ago, the US-based investigative journalism website ProPublica leaked internal documents revealing Facebook’s guidelines for dealing with hate speech and abusive language for its moderators in training. These “guidelines” fall nothing short of racist, discriminatory and tone deaf. One example of blatant racism was a multiple-choice question asking the moderators-to-be, "Which group is protected from hate speech?" Among the options were: female driver, white men and black children. The correct answer to the question was: white men.

It’s no surprise that Facebook, a company where the top-level executives are cisgender white men and only 2% of its staff is black, would allow hate speech against black children before white men. The real dilemma, however, is that the victims of Facebook’s racist policies use it as an outlet to express themselves, organize and build movements for social and political justice. The growing power of social media is undeniable, so Facebook’s rules are not only harmful to freedom of speech, a basic human right, they also exclude marginalized people from using the power of social media to affect meaningful change through social activism.

“Facebook’s rules exclude marginalized people from using the power of social media.”

South Africa’s Black First Land First movement’s (BLF) president, Andile Mngxitama, is among the many black activists, globally, who have consistently been discriminated against, racially profiled and silenced by virtue of Facebook’s racist community standards guidelines. The BLF president practically has a Facebook jail cell with his name on it by now and it takes just a few drops of white tears for him to land back in jail every other week after he’s released back to Facebook society.

Just recently, the BLF president was silenced for three days after posting a statement discouraging the unlawful evictions of black people by the neo-liberal party, the DA and its coalition partners, the Economic Freedom Fighters, in the Gauteng Province. Facebook relies on users to report content for their moderators to review. So, keeping in mind the type of training these moderators received, they may have gotten the job because Facebook’s racist conduct resonates with them. They probably “correctly” answered that they would protect white men and not black children or women (from hate speech) during their training.

“The BLF president practically has a Facebook jail cell with his name on it.”

The most common, and in some instances appropriate, response to racist white establishments that rely on us to survive would be a boycott, because in the words of Zinzi Clemmons, “They can’t have our words if they don’t respect us.” However, most black activists have built a strong following on this platform. For instance, with movements like BLF and Black Lives Matter, social media is an easy way to communicate with and educate society and the people who look to them for socio-political action. So, to boycott Facebook would be to boycott the hard work they have put in to build their following, it would be to boycott social media mobilization (which has proven to be a powerful method for organizing rallies and marches) and it would be boycotting the right to be treated fairly and without discrimination.

“Social media is an easy way to communicate with and educate society and the people who look to them for socio-political action.”

Facebook needs to be transformed from the inside out. Their internal policies are just as problematic as the policies they impose on users. The notion that Mark Zuckerberg & Co mustn’t be labeled as white supremacists because they didn’t intend for Facebook to be a breeding ground for bigotry and racism when it was created is utter rubbish because black activists are not being victimized by their intentions for creating Facebook; they’re being victimized by Facebook’s actions and policies. It’s Facebooks swift action against posts by black people that challenge whiteness for hate crimes and the actions that they don’t take to protect marginalized individuals from bigotry that underpins their white supremacist ethos.

Black people from all over the world must come together and in the ultimate act of savagery, organize and mobilize against Facebook, on Facebook; to send a clear message that we will not boycott because of all that we’ve invested into growing this platform but will also no longer tolerate being silenced and discriminated against.

Thabi Myeni is student and member of the Black First Land First movement in South Africa.

This article previously appeared in Pambazuka News

Facebook censorship

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


Related Stories

Obama Wants Censorship
Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
Obama Wants Censorship
27 April 2022
Barack Obama and his ruling class bosses are losing legitimacy with more and more people. They have decided that censoring information wil
Facebook is Not Your Friend
Glen Ford , BAR executive editor
Facebook is Not Your Friend
18 October 2018
Facebook has become The Great Censor, ready to pull the pages of dissenters that seek to “stir up political debate” in ways that threaten the legit

More Stories


  • Jacqueline Luqman
    The Perfect Victim Narrative Applied To Foreign Policy Only Keeps U.S. Imperialism Alive
    23 Sep 2026
    The demand to call out alleged crimes in Iran or Cuba while those countries face annihilation from the U.S. and Israel is a refusal to see those people as human beings worthy of protection.
  • Charisse Burden-Stelly, PhD
    Twentieth Century Red Scares in the United States
    23 Sep 2026
    Red Scares are a recurring feature of the U.S. political tradition aimed at criminalizing anticapitalist politics through accusations of foreign infiltration and conspiracy. The NSPM-7 and the report…
  • Abayomi Azikiwe
    Niger Thwarts Attempted Coup Amid Ongoing Threats to the Alliance of Sahel States
    23 Sep 2026
    For several years, three landlocked West African states have undergone political transformations designed to turn the page on French neo-colonialism.
  • Black Alliance For Peace
    U.S. Hands off Mali, U.S. Hands off the AES, U.S. Out of Africa, and Shut Down AFRICOM
    23 Sep 2026
    The U.S. is considering drone strikes and sanctions against the Alliance of Sahel States under the guise of counterterrorism, but the real objective is to regain neo-colonial control over African…
  • Roberta Rivolta
    Western Activism and the Axis of Resistance
    23 Sep 2026
    Western pro-Palestinian activism isolates Palestine from its regional allies, depoliticizing its struggle and reinforcing colonial divisions.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us