Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Debate Moderator Lester Holt Asks Zero Questions About Poverty, Abortion, Climate Change
Adam Johnson
28 Sep 2016
🖨️ Print Article

by Adam Johnson

This Monday showed there were multiple ways to fix a crooked presidential debate.  The first way is to exclude everyone but the representatives of the two capitalist parties.  A second way explored elsewhere in this issue was outside crowd control, and a third, as FAIR's Adam Johnson explained, was to let the crooks decide what questions they'd be asked.

Lester Holt Asks Zero Questions About Poverty, Abortion, Climate Change

by Adam Johnson

Originally published by our friends at FAIR.ORG

Presidential debates do as much to illustrate corporate media priorities as they do to showcase the candidates. They provide a snapshot into what the media, in this case represented by NBC’s Lester Holt, prioritizes as issues worthy of discussion.

A week before the debate,Comcast-owned NBC announced the topics, and one could already tell we weren’t going to be in for a substantive evening: “Achieving prosperity,” “America’s direction” and “securing America.” This generic approach lead to a generic debate that focused mostly on horserace disputes and vague, open-ended questions about taxes and jobs.

Holt didn’t ask any questions about the following topics: poverty, abortion, climate change,  immigration, healthcare, student debt, privacy, LGBTQ rights or drug policy. (NBC reported before the debate that abortion and immigration were two of the policy issues that voters were most interested in, as indicated byGoogle searches, along with the economy and police shootings.)

What was discussed: jobs, Trump’s tax returns, who did or didn’t support the Iraq War, raising taxes on the rich, race (framed mostly in a way that pandered to Trump’s theme of a country in disarray), Russian cyberattacks, ISIS, Obama’s birth certificate, Clinton’s physical appearance and whether the candidates would accept the election results.

Obviously, a moderator can’t cover every topic in a 90-minute debate, but one can hardly imagine a scenario where the candidates weren’t asked to discuss taxes on the wealthy, ISIS and the specter of Russian cyberattacks—topics, not coincidentally, the average person is rarely if ever affected by, but receive nonstop discussion on cable news and opinion sections. Holt even framed raising taxes on the wealthy—whose share of national income has multiplied sixffold over the last 40 years—as something Clinton had to “defend.”

Total mentions from the moderator and the two candidates combined for ISIS were 24; Russia/Putin had 16 and Iran 19. Total mentions of abortion, poverty, health insurance, LGBTQ rights and voter suppression were zero. Climate change was only mentioned—once—because Clinton brought it up.

As FAIR noted previously, in nine Democratic Party debates, there were no questions asked about poverty. As Think Progress pointed out, there were also zero questions about abortion.

Issues specifically affecting the poor, LGBTQ people and women (aside from a question about Trump denying that Clinton had “a presidential look”) continue to be overlooked. To the extent race was discussed, it was framed with the false parity of “race relations.” Holt didn’t ask Clinton, for example, how she would fight racism—a word Holt never mentioned—but instead asked her how she would “heal the divide.” (In Holt’s defense, he did press Trump on his racist “birther” campaign.)

The next debate will be on October 9, hosted by ABC’s Martha Raddatz, a reporter noted for her closeness to military sources (FAIR Blog, 11/14/11).


Adam Johnson is a contributing analyst for FAIR.org. You can follow him onTwitter at @AdamJohnsonNYC.

You can send messages to NBC News  via Twitter: @NBCNews.  Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective.

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • Editors, The Black Agenda Review
    ESSAY: The Question of Compensation: A Third World Perspective, Norman Girvan, 1972
    20 Sep 2023
    Where are multinational corporations in discussions of reparations? The late Jamaican political economist Norman Girvan provides an answer.        
  • Getting Ethiopia Dead Wrong
    Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor
    Getting Ethiopia Dead Wrong
    20 Sep 2023
    Rasmus Sonderriis's book is a thorough exposé of the West's destructively deceitful narrative about Ethiopia's two-year Tigray War.
  • BAR Book Forum: Celeste Winston’s Book “How to Lose the Hounds”
    Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
    BAR Book Forum: Celeste Winston’s Book “How to Lose the Hounds”
    20 Sep 2023
    This week’s featured author is Celeste Winston.
  • Understanding the White Supremacy at the Center of the 'Class Over Race' Debate
    Jon Jeter
    Understanding the White Supremacy at the Center of the 'Class Over Race' Debate
    20 Sep 2023
    Any talk of discussing class instead of racism is disingenuous in a country which uses every opportunity to indulge in anti-Black racism. The history of racism in the labor movement is just one…
  • Libya’s disastrous flooding… Causes and hope?
    Essam Elkorghli
    Libya’s disastrous flooding… Causes and hope?
    20 Sep 2023
    The U.S./NATO destruction of the Libyan state in 2011 was followed unilateral coercive measures, sanctions, which rendered that nation unable to maintain dams which failed during a recent storm.…
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us