Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Beating Trial of LAPD Officer Begun, Then Delayed By “Peace Officer's Bill of Rights”
Thandisizwe Chimurenga
04 Mar 2015
🖨️ Print Article

Beating Trial of LAPD Officer Begun, Then Delayed By “Peace Officer's Bill of Rights”

by BAR special correspondent Thandisizwe Chimurenga

The case of People v. Mary O’Callaghan began in a Los Angeles courtroom last Wed., Feb. 25, but was halted and delayed till April 2 as the court moved to hear new evidence in the case. Approximately 50-60 perspective jurors who had been sworn in were dismissed.

Mary O’Callaghan is the LAPD officer who kicked/stomped 33-year old Alesia Thomas seven times in the groin/vaginal area in July of 2012. She was charged with Abuse Under Color of Authority by the L.A. County District Attorney’s office after a recommendation from an internal LAPD hearing. If convicted O’Callaghan could face a maximum of one year in county jail and/or a fine of $10,000 if convicted.

At issue appears to be statements made by an unidentified police officer to O’Callaghan on the night Alesia Thomas was arrested: that the officer told O’Callaghan to “stop it; cut it out.” 

The evidence of this statement was brought to the attention of the prosecutor just prior to the start of the day’s proceedings. The statement was made at an LAPD Board of Rights hearing for the officer in question therefore, it is considered to be a private, personnel issue per the state’s Police Officer's Bill of Rights Act. (POBRA) The defense argues that it should be entitled to the evidence of the statement as part of the discovery process and to use to possibly impeach future testimony.  In order for the prosecutor to turn over said evidence, a hearing called a Pitchess Motion must be made.

According to the judge presiding in the trial, Terry Bork, the trial cannot proceed without the evidence in question being turned over to the defense. Bork granted the defense’ request for a continuance and dismissed the potential jurors.

Pitchess Motions are currently the only way that information in a police officer’s personnel file can be given to someone outside of the police department, such as a defense attorney, in the state of California. 

The Police Officer's Bill of Rights Act (POBRA) has been and continues to be a source of frustration for many anti-police terror activists in California. Reports of officer-involved shootings, excessive force and disciplinary matters are all off limits to activists, journalists, accountability advocates as well as the general public because they are contained in an officer’s personnel file and are considered private.

Thomas left her two small children at the 77th Street Division of the Los Angeles Police Department around 2 a.m. the morning of July 22, 2012. The children reportedly had a note with them that said their grandmother should be called.

Police officers eventually ended up at the door of Thomas’ apartment a few hours later to question her about the abandonment of her children. Police made a decision to take Thomas into custody where a struggle ensued. Officers reported that they struggled to get Thomas out of her 2nd floor apartment building and then struggled to get her into a police car.  Thomas was eventually put into the back of the police car but her legs were reportedly hanging outside of the door. O’Callaghan and her fellow officers were having difficulty getting Thomas all the way into the back seat, and at one point O’Callaghan was overheard by one fellow officer to threaten to kick Thomas “if she kept it up.” O’Callaghan eventually “utilized her feet seven times on three separate occasions to push or kick the Subject, in the upper thigh, groin and abdomen area” into the police car, according to an internal LAPD report.

Judge Bork has scheduled the Pitchess Motion to be heard on April 2.

Thandisizwe Chimurenga is a freelance journalist based in Los Angeles and the author of No Doubt: The Murder(s) of Oscar Grant. She covered the Detroit trial of Ted Wafer for the murder of Renisha McBride in 2014 for Black Agenda Report dot com and Color of Change dot org.

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • Freedom Rider: Giuliani and Brennan: Truth or Dare
    Margaret Kimberley , BAR editor and senior columnist
    Freedom Rider: Giuliani and Brennan: Truth or Dare
    22 Aug 2018
    The Russiagate investigation is proof that this country is run by liars, race baiters, warmongers, torturers and their enablers.
  • When Things Fall Apart: The Trump Era and the Missing Left
    Danny Haiphong , BAR contributor
    When Things Fall Apart: The Trump Era and the Missing Left
    22 Aug 2018
    The moribund politics of the ruling class posing as The Resistance are creating the perfect conditions for another four years of Donald Trump.
  • An Open Letter to ‘Socialists’ Who Might be Fronting for the Democratic Party
    Quetzal Cáceres
    An Open Letter to ‘Socialists’ Who Might be Fronting for the Democratic Party
    22 Aug 2018
    Any socialist who thought, as I did, that Ocasio-Cortez would be our socialist champion should watch the entire 27-minute PBS Firing Line interview to get a sense of just how
  • Call for Submissions: Abolition Journal’s Special Issue on “Spirituality and Abolition”
    Ashon Crawley and Roberto Sirvent
    Call for Submissions: Abolition Journal’s Special Issue on “Spirituality and Abolition”
    22 Aug 2018
    This Call for Submission asks the question: what can prison abolition, and other abolitions, teach us about spiritual practice, spiritual journey, spiritual commitment?
  • BAR Book Forum: Macarena Gómez-Barris’ “The Extractive Zone”
    Roberto Sirvent, BAR Book Forum Editor
    BAR Book Forum: Macarena Gómez-Barris’ “The Extractive Zone”
    22 Aug 2018
    The view that we have no future allows those on the planet with privilege to continue with their ideology of disposability.”
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us