Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Wafer Takes Stand in His Own Defense in Trial for the Death of Renisha McBride
Thandisizwe Chimurenga
30 Jul 2014
🖨️ Print Article

Shooter describes incident as 'devastating' and happening 'too fast'

 

Thandisizwe Chimurenga

 

Theodore Paul Wafer took the stand in his own defense today. Charged with 2nd degree murder and involuntary manslaughter in the death of 19-year old Renisha McBride, the 55-year old airport maintenance worker faces a maximum sentence of life in prison for the first charge and 15 years for the manslaughter charge if convicted.

Wafer spoke in an even, low tone that was at times almost hard to hear as his attorney Cheryl Carpenter told the jury she wanted them to get to know him.

Carpenter began by asking Wafer about his personal life; his job at the Detroit Airport; his neighborhood; the various changes that had occurred in the area since he began living in the house about 20 years ago and eventually, what happened in the early morning hours of Nov. 2, 2013, when he killed McBride, a temporary Ford factory worker, with a shotgun blast to the face.

Wafer recounted how he had worked the 7 a.m. - 3 p.m. shift that day and then gone to a neighborhood pub once he left work. Wafer said he had three beers then went home around 7 pm, eventually falling asleep in his recliner with the tv. He would awaken, change clothes and go back to bed sometime after 10 pm.

As his story progressed toward the fateful moment Wafer started breathing harder and began to hold his forehead with one hand, eyes closed, as he told the jury about a “banging” at the front door of his house and then on the side.

According to Wafer, the banging and knocking got louder as he looked for his cellphone, which he usually kept on a charger on the side of his recliner, but couldn't find it. He described the noises as an “attack” on his home, with windows “rattling” and floors “vibrating,” which prompted him to first grab a baseball bat he kept near his side entrance door.

Wafer said he made the decision to retrieve his Mossburg 12-gauge pistol grip shotgun from his closet because he thought people were coming into his home to get him.

Wafer bought the weapon in 2008, he said, because he “wasn't getting any younger,” and wasn't able to afford a home security system.

“I didn't want to cower … be a victim in my own home,” said Wafer when asked by Carpenter why he went to the front door and opened it.

Repeating that he thought the weapon was unloaded, Wafer says he went to the door with his shotgun because it was “a pretty menacing weapon” and he thought the sight of it would scare off whoever was out there.

According to Wafer, he saw no one when he first peered out the door; he opened the door all the way and that's when “the person come around from the right of my house so fast and I raised the gun and shot.” He said his pulling of the trigger was a “purely reflex action,” and that it looked like McBride “fell back in slow motion.”

Asked by Carpenter how fast the incident transpired, Wafer replied “too fast … too fast.”

Wafer cried and wiped his eyes as Carpenter asked him if he thought about the incident often.

“Yes,” Wafer answered. “So devastating … this poor girl. She had her whole life in front of her. I took that from her,” he said.

Athina Siringas, Wayne County assistant prosecutor, began her cross-examination of Wafer by noting he had been very emotional while on the stand testifying for about one hour. “Dd you cry during 2 to 2 ½ hours of questioning in the police station?” she asked.

Video of Wafer's interview with Dearborn Heights Police Officers showed him very calm and collected during the approximately 45-minute session. At one point, Wafer repeats that he didn't know the gun was loaded; at another he says the shooting was “self-defense as far as I’m concerned,” while noting that “I should have called you guys first.”

“So is it okay for me to take the screen off my house now?” was the last question Wafer asked as he exited the interview.

Closing arguments in the case are expected to begin Wednesday, August 6.

 

follow @idabeewells for up-to-the-minute trial coverage.

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • Renewed Calls for International Solidarity from Haitian Trade Unions and Civil Society Organizations
    Travis Ross
    Renewed Calls for International Solidarity from Haitian Trade Unions and Civil Society Organizations
    15 Mar 2023
    Haitian trade unions and civil society groups are united in demanding sovereignty for their nation and an end to foreign interference.
  • Eddie Conway Tribute
    Mali Collins
    Eddie Conway Tribute
    15 Mar 2023
    The late Eddie Conway was a young member of the Black Panther Party who was framed for the killing of a police officer and spent more than 40 years in jail. His experience as a political…
  • Monroe Doctrine Plays Out in Perú
    Clau O'Brien Moscoso
    Monroe Doctrine Plays Out in Perú
    15 Mar 2023
    The people of Peru continue to protest the coup which ousted President Pedro Castillo Terrones. The 200-year-old Monroe Doctrine is a discredited relic, but Washington still considers the…
  • SNAP Benefits for African Mothers Are Gone, While Ukraine Eats Good
    Erica Caines
    SNAP Benefits for African Mothers Are Gone, While Ukraine Eats Good
    15 Mar 2023
    The perfect storm of austerity policies and US imperialism sends billions of dollars to Ukraine but ends pandemic era emergency Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.
  • The International Politics of Observing Elections
    Owei Lakemfa
    The International Politics of Observing Elections
    15 Mar 2023
    The practice of accepting observers to oversee elections is quite problematic. This practice leads to interference from entities with ulterior motives and legacies of colonial control.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us