Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Remembering the Politics of Martin Luther King Jr. in the Age of Obama
Danny Haiphong, BAR contributor
21 Jan 2014
🖨️ Print Article

by Danny Haiphong

Barack Obama took his presidential oath on Dr. King’s bible, but has spent every day in office fighting against MLK’s legacy. “If King were alive today, he would be on the streets opposing each and every one of Obama’s neo-liberal economic policies and imperialist wars.”

 

Remembering the Politics of Martin Luther King Jr. in the Age of Obama

by Danny Haiphong

“He ended his life embracing a radical vision of US society that included an end to US war-mongering, racism, and poverty and the beginning of a truly egalitarian society.”

Martin Luther King Jr. would have been 85 this year. King’s birthday passes each year with most people in this country lacking a more complete understanding of King’s political significance. A proper celebration of King’s birthday is the continuation of the struggle against war, poverty, and racism. However, we cannot apply King’s vision to our historical moment without correctly studying King’s politics beyond what we are taught by the US corporate media, government, and school system.

The US government was indicted of murdering Martin Luther King in his family’s civil case in 1999. What made the US government do it? King was one of many Black activists targeted by the FBI’s COINTELPRO operations in the 60’s and 70’s. King’s opposition to US militarism, as well as his solidarity with poor and working class Black people, grew out of favor with the Johnson Administration. In the two years before he was assassinated, King’s speeches moved away from calling for Black integration within a system ruled by white and toward a struggle against what he called the three evils of militarism, materialism, and racism. King opposed the Vietnam War and questioned his own his position of non-violence in the wake of US savagery in Vietnam and the racist police violence poor Black youth experienced in US cities.

Martin Luther King went from shaking hands with US politicians to being murdered by them. When he was shot that faithful day in Memphis, King was preparing to stand in solidarity with striking sanitation workers. He was raising critical questions about the US capitalist economy and proposed radical policies such as a universal income and full employment. Although Martin Luther King did not endorse violent revolutionary upheaval, he ended his life embracing a radical vision of US society that included an end to US war-mongering, racism, and poverty and the beginning of a truly egalitarian society.

“The sanitization and domestication of King’s politics lends legitimacy to the US ruling circle.”

Remembering the radical Dr. King is critical in the age of Obama. US imperialism has washed away King’s radicalism in its ideological war against Black anti-establishment politics. Those who hated King when he was alive now romantically praise him as a champion of white forgiveness and Black pragmatism. Mainstream conversations about King rarely deviate from fond memories of his “I Have A Dream” speech and his great love for all people, even his oppressors. The sanitization and domestication of King’s politics lends legitimacy to the US ruling circle as it continues to exploit humanity and Black people in particular.

For the US imperialist system, revising King’s legacy is a useful weapon against the oppressed. In January of 2013, millions watched as Barack Obama was sworn into his second term on Martin Luther King’s bible. This symbolic act by the commander-in-chief of US empire linked the ascendency of Barack Obama to the heroic struggle of Martin Luther King. For four-plus years, the ruling classes have constructed the idea that Martin Luther King Jr’s “dream” was accomplished through the election of Barack Hussein Obama. But If King were alive today, he would be on the streets opposing each and every one of Obama’s neo-liberal economic policies and imperialist wars. Indeed, King’s belief that the US government was “the greatest purveyor of violence in the world” would remain unchanged fifty plus years later. It is this King we need to revive in both mind and spirit as we continue the struggle for justice he gave his life for.

Danny Haiphong is an activist and case manager in the Greater Boston area. You can contact Danny at: wakeupriseup1990@gmail.com. 

 

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • The US Dictatorship of (White) Capital and its Tools of Bamboozlement 
    Glen Ford, BAR Executive Editor
    The US Dictatorship of (White) Capital and its Tools of Bamboozlement 
    24 Sep 2020
    The New York Times and fellow corporate media discourage Americans from organizing against the rule of the rich by pretending that People Power is a fantasy. 
  • Freedom Rider: The Democrats’ Supreme Failure
    Margaret Kimberley, BAR senior columnist
    Freedom Rider: The Democrats’ Supreme Failure
    23 Sep 2020
    The corporate Democrats refuse to back measures that appeal to huge majorities of their base, preferring instead to campaign against one evil man and his appointees.
  • Biden and the Democrats Have No Plan to Stop the Bleeding—at Home or Abroad
    Danny Haiphong, BAR Contributing Editor
    .Biden and the Democrats Have No Plan to Stop the Bleeding—at Home or Abroad
    23 Sep 2020
    The Democrats say they’re running against the most “dangerous president in modern American history,” but Joe Biden has no prescription for resolving any of the crises facing Black and working class
  • Demilitarizing the NFL
    Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor
    Demilitarizing the NFL
    23 Sep 2020
    Nation Magazine sportswriter Dave Zirin, speaking to Ann Garrison, says that militarism is a founding feature of American football, not just a bug, but we don’t have to accept it in f
  • OK to say the F-word?
    Raymond Nat Turner, BAR poet-in-residence
    OK to say the F-word?
    23 Sep 2020
    P.O.E.T. are the only letters behind my name— So you scowl; scold; spank my hands with rulers and switches worn smooth from serial beatdowns, dare I use the F-word…
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us