Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Namibian Government Blames NATO for Mali Unrest
Toivo Ndjebela
18 Apr 2012
🖨️ Print Article

 

by Toivo Ndjebela

In 1964, the Organization of African Unity’s first order of business was to hold sacrosanct the national borders inherited from colonialism, so that the continent would not be plagued by secessionist movements manipulated by the former oppressors. With the partition of Sudan and NATO’s crushing of Libya, Pandora’s box has been opened. Now Mali has been torn in two. “Those tearing Mali into administrative pieces should have observed the African Union’s principle of inviolability of borders of African countries.”

 

Namibian Government Blames NATO for Mali Unrest

by Toivo Ndjebela

This article previously appeared in New Era, a Newspaper for a New Namibia.

“Those countries that rushed to use military force in Libya, had underestimated the severe repercussions of their actions in the Sahel region.”

WINDHOEK – Namibia has blamed the architects of last year’s overthrow of the Libyan government for the civil strife and the recent coup against a democratically elected government in Mali.

Tuareg rebels in Mali have proclaimed independence for the country’s northern part after capturing key towns this week.

Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi administration fell last year after local rebels, with the help of NATO forces – and initially France, Britain and the USA – drove the long-serving leader out of the capital Tripoli and ultimately killing him after months in hiding.

The Namibian government believes the events in Libya are now bearing sour fruits within the western and northern parts of Africa, in what is jointly known as the Sahel region.

“The profoundly retrogressive developments in Mali are a direct consequence of the unstable security and political situation in Libya, created by the precipitous military overthrow of the government of Libya in 2011,” a government statement, released Tuesday by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, states.

The statement continued:

“Accordingly, those countries that rushed to use military force in Libya, had underestimated the severe repercussions of their actions in the Sahel region.”

“They should thus bear some responsibility for the instability in Mali and the general insecurity in the region.”

Nomadic Tuaregs have harbored ambitions to secede Mali’s northern part since the country’s independence from France in 1960, but lack of foreign support for this idea meant the dream would only be realized 52 years later.

“The Namibian government believes the events in Libya are now bearing sour fruits within the western and northern parts of Africa.”

Namibia herself survived a secession attempt in 1999 when a self-styled rebel group, led by former Swapo and DTA politician Mishake Muyongo, now exiled in Denmark, attempted to separate the Caprivi Region from the rest of Namibia.

The Mali situation already cost Amadou Toumani Toure his job last month, when junior army officers overthrew him for what they say was his reluctance to avail resources needed to fight the advancing Tuareg rebels.

Speaker of Mali’s parliament, Doincounda Traore, was expected to be sworn in as president yesterday morning, a development that would restore civilian rule in the humanitarian crisis-hit West African country.

Traore is inheriting control of only half of the country, with northern Mali now falling under control of Tuareg rebels and Islamists.

Namibia said those tearing Mali into administrative pieces should have observed the African Union’s principle of inviolability of borders of the African countries.

“This principle of indivisibility of borders has served Africa well since its adoption by the OAU (Organisation of African Unity) Summit in Cairo in 1964,” the statement further reads.

It further stated:

“The Government of Namibia reiterates its unequivocal rejection of any attempt to dismember any African country and unreservedly condemns all manner of secessionist aspirations.”

Namibia is yet to officially recognize the new Libyan government, whose local embassy held a ‘revolution anniversary’ in February without attendance of any notable officials of the Namibian government.

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • How the U.S. and Canada are Wooing Latin America and the Caribbean to Front for their Plan to Invade Haiti
    Travis Ross
    How the U.S. and Canada are Wooing Latin America and the Caribbean to Front for their Plan to Invade Haiti
    08 Mar 2023
    The U.S. and Canada are using Caribbean and Latin nations to act as fronts, willing dupes, in their plans for the next occupation of Haiti. Travis Ross explains in the second of a three-part report.
  • Why the Huwwara Pogrom was Inevitable
    Maureen Clare Murphy
    Why the Huwwara Pogrom was Inevitable
    08 Mar 2023
    The attack by Israeli settlers on the town of Hawwara was no aberration. It was just one example of the violence inherent in an apartheid state.
  • Reconciliation Does Not Mean Forgetting in Nicaragua
    Jill Clark-Gollub
    Reconciliation Does Not Mean Forgetting in Nicaragua
    08 Mar 2023
    It is important to understand the truth about the 222 people recently released to the US who were convicted of treason in Nicaragua for savage acts of violence against their people.
  • Those Who Die for Life – like Hugo Chávez – Cannot Be Called Dead
    Vijay Prashad
    Those Who Die for Life – like Hugo Chávez – Cannot Be Called Dead
    08 Mar 2023
    The tenth anniversary of the death of Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez reminds us of his commitment to serve the people of his country, and to fighting for sovereignty for his nation and all the…
  • Reimagining Arms Control After Ukraine
    Scott Ritter
    Reimagining Arms Control After Ukraine
    08 Mar 2023
    Having used arms control to gain unilateral advantage over Russia, the cost to the U.S. and NATO in getting Moscow back to the negotiating table will be high.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us