Imperialism With a Black Face
A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford
"The time for blindly
rooting for the Brother will be over."
If Barack Obama succeeds in winning the presidency, Black
America will be put to a test that will define its political and moral
character for generations. We will discover if African Americans are really the
kind of progressive, compassionate, humanity-loving people that Martin Luther
King thought we were, that Malcolm X was so confident we were, and that the
political record up to this juncture in history seems to indicate we are.
The African American reputation as the most consistently
progressive ethnic group in the United States will stand or fall according to
how Blacks comport themselves, politically, under a Barack Obama
administration. Obama has not earned the Black vote; he has in fact treated
African Americans very shabbily, singling them out for cultural criticisms that
he would never direct against whites, Latinos or Asians. So-called Black
"leadership" has abdicated all claim to the title, by failing to make even the
most modest demands of Obama. As a consequence, Obama owes Blacks nothing,
having promised them nothing. But that has not mattered for the vast majority
of African Americans, who, like their timid leaders, have paid little attention
to issues of substance during this campaign. Rather, they are consumed by
centuries of pent-up aspirations to see a Black face in the highest place in
the land.
"The world will come to
hate him as they have other American presidents."
If that day comes, as conventional wisdom says is likely,
the test of African American morality, good character and collective wisdom,
begins. The time for blindly rooting for The Brother will be over. The many
voices of an evolving planet will suddenly intervene to make their own demands
on the American presidency. And unless Obama turns out to be the fictional "Spook Who Sat
by the Door" - a closet progressive and Race Man whose been fooling the
Imperialists and Warmongers and Lords of Capital and Reagan Democrats and all
the other bagmen for corruption he's been sucking up to - he will respond as
the corporate politician and military expansionist that he is. He will close
ranks with the same finance capitalists that are cannibalizing the last
remnants of American industry, as he has many times publicly promised to do. He
will leave the Bush Gang's multitudinous crimes uninvestigated and unpunished -
a promise repeated just days ago - thus leaving intact a veritable pirates' map
for future criminality. (Why not in his own administration?) And he will rush
to maintain the momentum of American Manifest Destiny, just as he has
repeatedly said he would, had only Blacks and progressives been listening.
Barack Obama has given his solemn word that he will
substantially increase the U.S. military budget, and will follow the Bush
Doctrine of preemptive attack if he deems it in U.S. interests. He will
continue to militarize Africa through the U.S. Africa Command, Africom, which
he heartily endorses. He will spread America's grasping tentacles deeper and
further around the planet - and the world will come to hate him as they have
other American presidents.
It is at this point, and it won't be long, that African
Americans will have to decide: Are they prouder that there is a Black face in
the nation's highest place, than they are ashamed that imperialism's face is
Black?
For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford.
BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted
at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.
A significant portion of sports franchise wealth can be traced directly to the oppression and displacement of Black and Brown bodies.
To understand why COVID-19 killed so many young Black men, you need to know the legend of John Henry. “Covid-19 is a new gear in an old machine.”
Black labor militants, many of whom were Communists, were the key to building the CIO in the South.
Intersection theory insists on the simultaneity of condition, the both/and of Black women’s oppression.
China will find itself engaged in an international struggle between its “win-win” approach to international policy and the US’s attempted “anti-China” policy.
