Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Obama and Clinton: The Siamese Twins
Bill Quigley
07 Nov 2007
🖨️ Print Article

Obama and Clinton: The Siamese Twins

 A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

"Their shared Iraq
position is no different than George Bush's stated goals."

ObamaNukeBang
Barack Obama is engaged in a high-profile/low substance
effort to distance himself from Hillary Clinton on the Iraq war. It's like
watching Siamese Twins slap each other around, knowing that the two are
genetically identical and inseparable. Clinton and Obama are conjoined War
Democrats who pretend to disagree on a phrase here and there. Both intend to
stay in Iraq as long as so-called "U.S. interests" dictate. In that regard,
their shared Iraq position is no different than George Bush's stated goals.

Last week, the New York Times gave Obama acres
of space
to spin his illusory Iraq "withdrawal" plan - more space than the
newspaper has afforded Dennis Kucinich, the real peace candidate, during the
whole primary campaign. It was a waste of words, see-through clothing on a
naked body. Obama claims he doesn't plan to maintain permanent bases in Iraq.
So, by the way, do Hillary Clinton and George Bush. But Obama says he'll employ
a "broader strategic" approach than Clinton - that he won't shy away from
"talking" directly to the leaders of Iran and Syria. Sen. Clinton says she'd
have to study the matter awhile, before deciding whether to have face-to-face
meetings.

But, meetings about what? Obama and Clinton both insist
that the U.S. military reserves the right to remain in Iraq until it serves
U.S. interests to do otherwise - in Obama's words, until "we see some
stability" in the region. But, what is "stability"? Apparently, it means pacification
- just as it did in Vietnam. The "withdrawal" of which Obama speaks is
predicated on leaving behind "secure" areas - again, in his words, "so we can
afford to remove troops." And that depends on getting the "cooperation" of the
Iraqis, friend and foe alike. George Bush sings the same
song
: "When Iraqis Stand Up, We Stand Down," says Bush, bringing back an
oldie-but-goldie phrase that presidents Johnson and Nixon deployed endlessly in
Southeast Asia, two generations ago.

"Like Bush and Clinton,
Obama refuses to take any military options ‘off the table.'"

Obama assured the New York Times that he doesn't
intend to stay in Iraq forObamaWarning another "ten or twenty years" - that is, if those
pesky Iraqis just act right. If they don't, all bets are off. Here's a
definitive quote from the candidate: "I will remove all our combat troops, we
will have troops there to protect our embassies and our civilian forces and we
will engage in counter terrorism activities," said Obama. However, he
continues, "How large that force is, whether it's located inside Iraq or as an
over the horizon force is going to depend on what our military situation is."

In other words, Iraq will have to be pacified for Obama's
14-to-15 month, piecemeal and totally iffy "withdrawal" plan to take place.
Hillary Clinton won't even mention anything smacking of a timetable, but that
really doesn't make a difference, since Obama's schedule depends on achievement
of some kind of U.S. "victory" before withdrawal - which is George Bush's
stated scenario, as well. Like Bush and Clinton, Obama refuses to take any
military options "off the table," including nuclear options. Although Obama is
less rhetorically bullying than Bush, and more charming than Clinton, all three
reserve the right to launch a first strike against Iran. This is the language
of war criminals.

It seems our problem is not the Siamese Twins, Obama and
Clinton, but Siamese Triplets, Hillary, Barack and Bush.

For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • Criticizing the Democratic Party is not “Privileged”, It is the Duty of a Revolutionary
    Danny Haiphong, BAR Contributing Editor
    Criticizing the Democratic Party is not “Privileged”, It is the Duty of a Revolutionary
    07 Apr 2021
    Neither AOC nor the rest of the Squad has mounted any significant challenge to the party’s corporate leadership, despite being elected for this exact purpose. 
  • PAMPHLET: Africa Fights for Freedom, Alpheaus Hunton, 1950
    Editors, The Black Agenda Review
    PAMPHLET: Africa Fights for Freedom, Alpheaus Hunton, 1950
    07 Apr 2021
    A pamphlet written 70 years ago by an exiled Black American communist reveals an African continent seething to break free from European colonization.
  • Rwanda and Zaire (DRC) 1990 to 1997, Where the US Blocked Real Humanitarian Intervention
    Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor
    Rwanda and Zaire (DRC) 1990 to 1997, Where the US Blocked Real Humanitarian Intervention
    07 Apr 2021
    The real story of the Rwandan genocide begins in 1990, when exiled Tutsis from Uganda invaded northern Rwanda, unleashing a deadly campaign that uprooted a million Hutu peasants and set ethnic tens
  • Testi-lyin’
    Raymond Nat Turner, BAR poet-in-residence
    Testi-lyin’
    07 Apr 2021
    Northeast, midwest, southwest, south, down south, up south, out south—south  of the Canadian border—Slouched down in his cruiser, slow-rollin’ the ‘hood; Or a-
  • Biden-Harris Look Ready to Keep U.S. In Afghanistan—Say No!
    Black Alliance For Peace
    Biden-Harris Look Ready to Keep U.S. In Afghanistan—Say No!
    07 Apr 2021
    The new Democratic administration seems determined to sabotage an agreement to end the “longest war.”
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us