Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Obama To Leave 50,000 Troops In Iraq Indefinitely
Bill Quigley
04 Mar 2009
šŸ–Øļø Print Article

Click the flash player above to hear this Black Agenda Radio commentary, or click here to download an mp3 copy.

rrrA Black Agenda Radio Commentary by Glen Ford

From a supposed "antiwar" candidate, to a fan of the murderous "surge," from a "no permanent bases" candidate to a "50,000 troops for the foreseeable future" president, Barack Obama, starting from the center, has progressed steadily rightward.

Obama To Leave 50,000 Troops in Iraq Indefinitely

A Black Agenda Radio Commentary by Glen Ford

With the turn of a phrase, President Obama has placed himself to the Right of his own party.ā€

Barack Obama, who was never an anti-war candidate, reveals himself as a pro-war president who would rather mangle the English language than tell the truth. Obama and his generals are agreed that the U.S. should leave about 50,000 U.S. troops in Iraq after the targeted withdrawal of so-called ā€œcombatā€ troops by the end of August, 2010. So, what are we supposed to call these 50,000 American military personnel, if they are not ā€œcombatā€ troops? Obama wants us to call them a ā€œtransition forceā€ – presumably, they will transition to death anyone that opposes them. Obama thinks that by changing the nomenclature, he can announce ā€œmission accomplished,ā€ declare peace, and then keep the war going indefinitely. That’s why the Joint Chiefs of Staff are happy, John McCain is happy,http://www.blackagendareport.com/images/stories/128/FAIRarticle.jpg but Democratic congressional leadership is anything but happy. With the turn of a phrase, President Obama has placed himself to the Right of his own party, and stabbed all of his wishful anti-war supporters in the back.

When it comes to torturing the language, Obama is more shameless than Vietnam-era presidents, who persisted in calling U.S. troops fighting in that country ā€œadvisorsā€ until the term became laughable. As much as they would like to, the American generals in Iraq and their commander-in-chief can’t call the 50,000 soldiers and Marines that are to remain behind ā€œadvisorsā€ – there are far too many of them, and they will continue to be organized for combat at the drop of a hat. Instead, the name-game describes the troops as a ā€œtransitionā€ force, as opposed to a combat force. Which doesn’t mean they won’t be in combat; on the contrary, armed Americans in full battle gear will be roaming around looking for targets and fighting alongside the Iraqi military. It will look and sound just like combat; people on both sides and civilians will be killed, just like in combat, but it will not be combat because President Obama says the mission is ā€œtransition.ā€ After August of 2010, U.S. soldiers and Marines in Iraq will be engaged in ā€œtransitioning,ā€ not combat.

ā€œObama has spoken. Semantics equals reality.ā€

Obama is worried that many people may not be sophisticated enough to understand the fine distinction between combat soldiering and ā€œtransitioning.ā€
 
"Let me say this as plainly as I can,ā€ Obama told Marines at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, last weekend. ā€œBy August 31, 2010,ā€ Obama said with a straight face, ā€œour combat mission in Iraq will end." Why? Because Obama chooses not to call it combat.  Obama has spoken. Semantics equals reality.
 
Which makes you wonder: what kind of semantic trick was Obama playing when he told the joint session of congress, ā€œI can stand here tonight and say without exception or equivocation that the United States of America does not torture?" If methodically killing people is not combat, then maybe the methodical infliction of physical and emotional pain isn’t always torture. Maybe torture, like combat, is in the eye of the beholder – or, more to the point, the Presidential Definer, the Semanticist-in-Chief.
 
Apparently, when Barack Obama promised change, he meant a change in definitions.
 
For Black Agenda Radio, I’m Glen Ford. On the web, go to www.BlackAgendaReport.com.
 
BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • Berthony Dupont
    How the OAS Works for Imperialism in Haiti
    07 Oct 2026
    The armed groups in Haiti are not a spontaneous wave of banditry, but a scheme orchestrated by imperialist powers in concert with a reactionary and subservient Haitian political class. The…
  • The Coalition for the Elimination of Imperialism in Africa
    CEIA Launches International Pan-African Solidarity Campaign for the Republic of Cuba
    07 Oct 2026
    A coalition of Pan-African and socialist organizations has launched an international campaign to defend Cuba, arguing that African peoples must remember the sacrifices Cuban internationalists made…
  • Dr. M. Reza Behnam
    Three Years of Genocide: How ā€˜Never Again’ Lost Meaning in Gaza
    07 Oct 2026
    If international law and justice are buried in the rubble of Gaza, the global community will ultimately be digging its own grave.
  • Sami Al-Arian
    Why Hamas believed the status quo was more dangerous than its 7 October gamble
    07 Oct 2026
    Three years into Israel's genocide in Gaza, the consequences of a decision driven by siege, settlement expansion, and assaults on Al-Aqsa are still unfolding.
  • BAR Radio
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    Black Agenda Report October 2, 2026
    02 Oct 2026
    In this week’s segment we hear about the right-wing politics of the anti-migrant movement in South Africa, ANC failures, and upcoming elections in that country. But we begin with the first and only…
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us