Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Obama To Leave 50,000 Troops In Iraq Indefinitely
Bill Quigley
04 Mar 2009
🖨️ Print Article

Click the flash player above to hear this Black Agenda Radio commentary, or click here to download an mp3 copy.

rrrA Black Agenda Radio Commentary by Glen Ford

From a supposed "antiwar" candidate, to a fan of the murderous "surge," from a "no permanent bases" candidate to a "50,000 troops for the foreseeable future" president, Barack Obama, starting from the center, has progressed steadily rightward.

Obama To Leave 50,000 Troops in Iraq Indefinitely

A Black Agenda Radio Commentary by Glen Ford

With the turn of a phrase, President Obama has placed himself to the Right of his own party.”

Barack Obama, who was never an anti-war candidate, reveals himself as a pro-war president who would rather mangle the English language than tell the truth. Obama and his generals are agreed that the U.S. should leave about 50,000 U.S. troops in Iraq after the targeted withdrawal of so-called “combat” troops by the end of August, 2010. So, what are we supposed to call these 50,000 American military personnel, if they are not “combat” troops? Obama wants us to call them a “transition force” – presumably, they will transition to death anyone that opposes them. Obama thinks that by changing the nomenclature, he can announce “mission accomplished,” declare peace, and then keep the war going indefinitely. That’s why the Joint Chiefs of Staff are happy, John McCain is happy,http://www.blackagendareport.com/images/stories/128/FAIRarticle.jpg but Democratic congressional leadership is anything but happy. With the turn of a phrase, President Obama has placed himself to the Right of his own party, and stabbed all of his wishful anti-war supporters in the back.

When it comes to torturing the language, Obama is more shameless than Vietnam-era presidents, who persisted in calling U.S. troops fighting in that country “advisors” until the term became laughable. As much as they would like to, the American generals in Iraq and their commander-in-chief can’t call the 50,000 soldiers and Marines that are to remain behind “advisors” – there are far too many of them, and they will continue to be organized for combat at the drop of a hat. Instead, the name-game describes the troops as a “transition” force, as opposed to a combat force. Which doesn’t mean they won’t be in combat; on the contrary, armed Americans in full battle gear will be roaming around looking for targets and fighting alongside the Iraqi military. It will look and sound just like combat; people on both sides and civilians will be killed, just like in combat, but it will not be combat because President Obama says the mission is “transition.” After August of 2010, U.S. soldiers and Marines in Iraq will be engaged in “transitioning,” not combat.

“Obama has spoken. Semantics equals reality.”

Obama is worried that many people may not be sophisticated enough to understand the fine distinction between combat soldiering and “transitioning.”
 
"Let me say this as plainly as I can,” Obama told Marines at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina, last weekend. “By August 31, 2010,” Obama said with a straight face, “our combat mission in Iraq will end." Why? Because Obama chooses not to call it combat.  Obama has spoken. Semantics equals reality.
 
Which makes you wonder: what kind of semantic trick was Obama playing when he told the joint session of congress, “I can stand here tonight and say without exception or equivocation that the United States of America does not torture?" If methodically killing people is not combat, then maybe the methodical infliction of physical and emotional pain isn’t always torture. Maybe torture, like combat, is in the eye of the beholder – or, more to the point, the Presidential Definer, the Semanticist-in-Chief.
 
Apparently, when Barack Obama promised change, he meant a change in definitions.
 
For Black Agenda Radio, I’m Glen Ford. On the web, go to www.BlackAgendaReport.com.
 
BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles? Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • Black Agenda Radio for Week of April 27, 2020
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley and Glen Ford
    Black Agenda Radio for Week of April 27, 2020
    27 Apr 2020
    Group Demands Louisiana Prisons Be “Evacuated”
  • New Mexico Exalts “Three Peoples” – and Leaves Blacks Out Entirely
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley and Glen Ford
    New Mexico Exalts “Three Peoples” – and Leaves Blacks Out Entirely
    27 Apr 2020
    In a recent article, Dr Natasha Howard, a lecturer in Africana Studies at the University of New Mexico, cited the campus’s “Three Peoples” mural as exemplifying the state
  • The Black "Progress Narrative" is Self-Defeating
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley and Glen Ford
    The Black "Progress Narrative" is Self-Defeating
    27 Apr 2020
    “When we think we’ve made progress, we are blinded to the ways we have not,” and wind up affirming our slave-like relationship to power, said Anthony Farley, a Visiting Profes
  • Group Demands Louisiana Prisons Be “Evacuated”
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley and Glen Ford
    Group Demands Louisiana Prisons Be “Evacuated”
    27 Apr 2020
    “The coronavirus is a death sentence on Black people,” who make up two-thirds of Louisiana’s prisoners, said Belinda Parker Brown, head of Louisiana United International.
  • Letters from Our Readers 
    Jahan Choudhry BAR Comments Editor
    Letters from Our Readers 
    24 Apr 2020
    The coup in Bolivia and the Bernie Sanders campaign were in your thoughts this week.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us