Swaziland Army in “Full Charge” After Protests, Many Killed by King’s Troops
The Swazi military has reportedly warned the population to “obey instructions” or “face full wraith of troops.”
“The army is now fully in charge for real .. not even the police knows what the army is doing now.”
The Army in Swaziland (eSwatini) has taken full charge after mass prodemocracy protests left many people dead, according to a Human Rights Watch official.
Dewa Mavhinga, director for Southern Africa, added reports received by the organization were that the Army were on a “killing spree,”
He said police in Swaziland had reported that the Army had refused to have joint operations so military deployment was not under civilian authority or oversight.
Mavhinga reported, ‘From a police source, the army is now fully in charge for real .. not even the police knows what the army is doing now.
‘They only call the police to collect bodies of people shot and killed.’
The Times of Swaziland reported on Sunday (4 July 2021) “Army declares ‘We have taken over’ and added those who failed to obey instructions “will face full wraith of troops.”
The Times reported the first sight of the army being deployed on the streets was on the previous Tuesday after protesters turned violent. As well as killings there are reports of widespread lootings.
A group from the Southern African Development Community (SADC) was in Swaziland on a fact-finding visit, but has yet to make a public statement.
Protests have been taking place across Swaziland for several weeks. People marched on local government offices delivering petitions asking for democratic reforms. King Mswati III rules Swaziland as an absolute monarch. He choses the Prime Minister and cabinet ministers. Political parties are banned from contesting election and groups advocating for democracy are outlawed under the Suppression of Terrorism Act.
This article previously appeared in All Africa.com.
Unlike the US and other corporate-ruled countries, activists inside and outside of government collaborated to bring about radical social change in Venezuela.
“Black freedom” as a claim, as a possibility, challenges us to imagine and to produce new modes of life.
That all this time later we are still learning new information about Hampton’s killing is testament to the sheer volume of the effort aimed at this young revolutionary.
Well-meaning whites think its quite alright to steal Black activists’ words – as long as their intentions are good, which is up to them to decide.
The CRC never defined identity politics as exclusionary or intended to mean that only those who experience a certain oppression can fight to end it.
