Swaziland Army in “Full Charge” After Protests, Many Killed by King’s Troops
The Swazi military has reportedly warned the population to “obey instructions” or “face full wraith of troops.”
“The army is now fully in charge for real .. not even the police knows what the army is doing now.”
The Army in Swaziland (eSwatini) has taken full charge after mass prodemocracy protests left many people dead, according to a Human Rights Watch official.
Dewa Mavhinga, director for Southern Africa, added reports received by the organization were that the Army were on a “killing spree,”
He said police in Swaziland had reported that the Army had refused to have joint operations so military deployment was not under civilian authority or oversight.
Mavhinga reported, ‘From a police source, the army is now fully in charge for real .. not even the police knows what the army is doing now.
‘They only call the police to collect bodies of people shot and killed.’
The Times of Swaziland reported on Sunday (4 July 2021) “Army declares ‘We have taken over’ and added those who failed to obey instructions “will face full wraith of troops.”
The Times reported the first sight of the army being deployed on the streets was on the previous Tuesday after protesters turned violent. As well as killings there are reports of widespread lootings.
A group from the Southern African Development Community (SADC) was in Swaziland on a fact-finding visit, but has yet to make a public statement.
Protests have been taking place across Swaziland for several weeks. People marched on local government offices delivering petitions asking for democratic reforms. King Mswati III rules Swaziland as an absolute monarch. He choses the Prime Minister and cabinet ministers. Political parties are banned from contesting election and groups advocating for democracy are outlawed under the Suppression of Terrorism Act.
This article previously appeared in All Africa.com.
U.S. policies are not guided by the whims of the individual who sits in the White House, but by the objective interests of dominant sectors of the ruling elite.
The trio of so-called “progressive” female officeholders pretend to fight the power, but only misdirect and bewilder.
Instead of showing solidarity with the third world, ADOS makes it clear that they want their share of the spoils of imperialism.
Arendt saw the “Negro question” as a “Negro problem” rather than a white problem.
The authors set out to reconstruct King’s critical theory of racial capitalism.
