Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Eric Holder Tortures the Constitution
07 Mar 2012
🖨️ Print Article

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder made the Constitution scream, in an effort to justify his president’s claim to “the power of life and death over any inhabitant of the planet, including citizens of the United States.” Discovering presidential powers never before revealed, Holder severed citizens’ rights to “due process” from the “judicial process.” Access to the courts is not required, when the president is judge, jury and executioner.

Eric Holder Tortures the Constitution

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

“The rule of law has been eviscerated, abolished by presidential decree and congressional acquiescence.”

U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder this week attempted to explain how the U.S. Constitution allows the American president to be a law unto himself – to be judge, jury and executioner. Those are the powers that President Obama claims are inherent in his office: the right to kill at will, based on evidence only he is fit to examine and assess. This is a system of law without courts, without evidence that either the public or the condemned person has a right to see, or to contest. One man, with the power of life and death over any inhabitant of the planet, including citizens of the United States.

They used to call such people kings. But even the English kings of old – at least since the signing of the Magna Carta 800 years ago – were compelled to recognize the principle that free men could only be punished based on the law of the land. The United States Constitution is rooted in the principle of due process of law, with the courts as final arbiters of whether the law has been served.

With the passage of preventive detention without trail or charge, and President Obama’s claim to have sole power to target any human being for death, the rule of law has been eviscerated, abolished by presidential decree and congressional acquiescence. A pillar of civilization has been toppled, but most people in the United States appear not to have noticed.

“Holder acted as if he’d found a previously undetected loophole in the Constitution.”

It turns out that due process of law is not what we thought it was, these last two centuries. Attorney General Holder defended the president’s authority to summarily execute, without sanction of the courts, or formal charges, or even evidence of crime, persons designated by him as enemies of the United States. You can’t get more king-like than that. Holder acted as if he’d found a previously undetected loophole in the Constitution. “‘Due process’ and ‘judicial process,’” he said, “are not one and the same, particularly when it comes to national security.” According to Holder, “The Constitution guarantees due process,” but it does not guarantee judicial process. In other words, the U.S. Constitution does not guarantee people access to the courts, even if they are targeted for execution. If that were true, it would be a worthless Constitution, but the U.S. Supreme Court has convincingly ruled, in a 2004 case, that citizens who are detained as enemy combatants have a right to confront the government on the facts of the matter “before a neutral decision maker” – that is, before a court of some kind. Certainly, such rights would apply to someone the president wants killed.

Ah, but this is war, says Eric Holder, and different rules apply. We could ask the rhetorical question: When does this war end? But Obama is clearly claiming to have rights that are inherent in the president’s national security powers. War is…whatever he says it is. Or, whatever President Romney or President Santorum say it is.

The Attorney General ultimately justifies the trashing of the Constitution on national security grounds. We have reached our national “hour of danger,” he says.

Holder is right about that. The danger is upon us, and it emanates from the White House. There’s a name for the danger: it's called fascism, which happens when militarists and the worst capitalists get together and abolish due process and the rule of law – which the First Black President of the United States has already done. For Black Agenda Radio, I’m Glen Ford. On the web, go to BlackAgendaReport.com.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.



Your browser does not support the audio element.

listen
http://traffic.libsyn.com/blackagendareport/20120307_gf_HolderDueProcess.mp3

More Stories


  • Freddie Gray and Why the Wealth of Sports Franchises Matter
    Gustavus Griffin
    Freddie Gray and Why the Wealth of Sports Franchises Matter
    06 Jan 2021
    A significant portion of sports franchise wealth can be traced directly to the oppression and displacement of Black and Brown bodies.
  • How COVID-19 Hollowed Out a Generation of Young Black Men
    Akilah Johnson and Nina Martin
    How COVID-19 Hollowed Out a Generation of Young Black Men
    06 Jan 2021
    To understand why COVID-19 killed so many young Black men, you need to know the legend of John Henry. “Covid-19 is a new gear in an old machine.”
  • The Freedom Struggle Is a Labor Struggle, Then and Now
    Robin D.G. Kelley
    The Freedom Struggle Is a Labor Struggle, Then and Now
    06 Jan 2021
    Black labor militants, many of whom were Communists, were the key to building the CIO in the South.
  • The Activist Roots of Black Feminist Theory
    Linda Burnham
    The Activist Roots of Black Feminist Theory
    06 Jan 2021
    Intersection theory insists on the simultaneity of condition, the both/and of Black women’s oppression.
  • China and US relations in Latin America
    John Ross and Vijay Prashad
    China and US relations in Latin America
    06 Jan 2021
    China will find itself engaged in an international struggle between its “win-win” approach to international policy and the US’s attempted “anti-China” policy. 
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us