Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Black Is Back Coalition Examines the Question of Elections
15 Aug 2012
🖨️ Print Article

 

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

The Black Is Back Coalition talks a look forward and back at its national conference, this weekend, in Newark, New Jersey. The gathering will focus on Blacks and elections in America. Forty years ago, Blacks took nominal power in much of urban America. “What did African Americans do correctly during this period of African American power at the polls in urban America, and where did we go wrong?”

 

Black Is Back Coalition Examines the Question of Elections

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

“Why is it that so many Black people have come to believe that elections are the only political game in town?”

Elections – what are they good for? Well, for a people who were deprived of all human rights for most of their almost four centuries on this continent, full participation in American elections might have seemed like Promised Land. Of course, by the mid-1960s, Blacks in some northern states had been voting continuously for a century and a half. But they held only five seats in the U.S. Congress, and had elected no big city mayors. Only about 70 Blacks occupied elected office of any kind in the South in the mid-60s, when the Voting Rights Act was passed.

The first African American elected mayor of a sizeable city was Robert C. Henry, of Springfield, Ohio, a town of about 80,000 not far from Dayton. But Springfield was mostly white, so Mayor Henry’s rise to City Hall was not a product of the Black community’s political power. The era of Black big city governance is usually dated to January, 1968, when Carl Stokes became mayor of Cleveland. The demographic changes that had been wrought by the Great Black Migration and white flight found electoral expression in the Seventies, when the words Black and urban became almost synonymous. Suddenly, the Black metropolis was a central fact of American life. In quick succession, other major cities joined Cleveland as citadels of Black electoral power. (See “List of First African American Mayors.”)

“Who decided 40 years ago that mass grassroots movements were passé?”

Forty years later, Washington DC, the quintessential Chocolate City, has lost its Black majority, Atlanta and Newark are headed in the same direction, and Black Harlem is shrinking like a raisin in the sun, as are the Black populations of New York City as a whole and most other African American population centers. Gentrification, which is the most visible expression of finance capital’s determination to reclaim the cities for those with money, and the deindustrialization of America, have brought the beginning of the end of the era of the Black Metropolis.

Therefore, it is really quite late in the game to conduct an analysis of what Black people did during those decades when they wielded overwhelming electoral power in the big cities, since that historical window is now closing. Nevertheless, the period must be honestly evaluated, because it provides real answers to the real problems that Black people confronted in the quest for self-determination. What did African Americans do correctly during this period of African American power at the polls in urban America, and where did we go wrong?

This weekend, August 18 and 19, in Newark, New Jersey, the Black Is Back Coalition for Social Justice, Peace and Reparations will dedicate much of its annual conference to the question of elections: who pays for them, who makes the rules, who dominates the conversation – and, most importantly, why is it that so many Black people have come to believe that elections are the only political game in town? Who was it, representing what social strata in Black America, that decided 40 years ago that mass grassroots movements were passé, and that running for office in the Democratic Party was the road to genuine Black empowerment? And what good are Black politicians who are answerable to rich people outside of the Black community?

For information on the Black Is Back national conference in Newark, go to BlackIsBackCoalition.org.

For Black Agenda Radio, I’m Glen Ford. On the web, go to BlackAgendaReport.com.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.



Your browser does not support the audio element.

listen
http://traffic.libsyn.com/blackagendareport/20120815_gf_BlacksElections.mp3

More Stories


  • Black Agenda Radio
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    Black Agenda Radio December 13, 2024
    13 Dec 2024
    In this week’s segment, we hear a 2019 analysis from the late Glen Ford on US support of jihadist proxies as part of regime change efforts. Also, Margaret Kimberley discusses the 2024 election, Joe…
  • Tanks in Syria
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    Gerald Horne Analyzes the Collapse of the Syria Government
    13 Dec 2024
    Dr. Gerald Horne joins us to discuss the recent and very rapid collapse of the Syrian state and its international impacts, including in Africa.
  • Biden's tweet about Syria
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    U.S. Still Protects Jihadists in Syria
    13 Dec 2024
    BAR continues coverage of the collapse of the Syrian state with a look back at Black Agenda Report analysis from May 27, 2019. The late Glen Ford, then Executive Editor, analyzed the history of the U…
  • Jamarl Thomas
    Black Agenda Radio with Margaret Kimberley
    2024 Election, Hunter Biden Pardon, Uhuru 3 with Jamarl Thomas
    13 Dec 2024
    Margaret Kimberley recently appeared with Jamarl Thomas on his YouTube channel. They discussed the 2024 election, Joe Biden’s pardon of his son Hunter Biden, and the case of the Uhuru 3.
  • Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
    War Propaganda and the Fall of Syria
    11 Dec 2024
    A succession of U.S. presidents have been committed to regime change in Syria. That long-held goal has been achieved in part through a sustained campaign of war propaganda.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us