Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Amend the Constitution or Submit to Corporate Dictatorship
28 Apr 2010
🖨️ Print Article

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

With its recent ruling that corporations have the constitutional right to suborn the government through unlimited campaign spending, the U.S. Supreme Court delivered "the final mockery and insult to the very concept of one person, one vote." There is not alternative but to change the Constitution.

Amend the Constitution or Submit to Corporate Dictatorship

A Black Agenda Radio commentary by Glen Ford

"The whole notion of government by the people will have been fully superseded by the reality of government by corporations."

A growing coalition of progressive organizations has begun a race against time, a desperate struggle to prevent corporate money from snuffing out what remains of electoral democracy in the United States. The U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling, that corporations have the freedom of speech right to spend as much money as they see fit to influence elections, represents the final mockery and insult to the very concept of one person, one vote. If the High Court's decision is allowed to be the final word, then the whole notion of government by the people will have been fully superseded by the reality of government by corporations acting as a species of immortal super-citizens - paper people empowered by money.

The American political system has always favored the rich - which is no wonder, since the legal edifice of the Republic was invented by some of the wealthiest men in the slaveholding former British colonies. The U.S. Constitution's intricate system of "checks and balances" was primarily designed to keep everybody but rich white men in check, and to ensure that the balance of power would weigh decisively on the side of wealth. More than two centuries later, the U.S. Supreme Court decision has put a killer knot in the noose around the popular franchise, one that can only be loosened by amending the Constitution, itself.

It is a lengthy process, by design. After ten years, including a three-year extension, the Equal Rights Amendment for women, or ERA, failed to secure ratification by the required 38 states, and died in 1982. This, despite broad, bipartisan support. The Constitutional amendment submitted by Black Maryland Congresswoman Donna Edwards seeks to void the Supreme Court ruling, by allowing Congress and the states to regulate the way corporations spend campaign money. The amendment, if passed by two-thirds of the House and Senate, would then have seven years to gain ratification by three-quarters of the states, or bite the dust, like the ERA. Just getting the amendment through Congress will be a test of whether corporate money has already neutered the American legislative system, even without the Supreme Court's help.

"The U.S. Constitution's intricate system of 'checks and balances' was primarily designed to keep everybody but rich white men in check."

Donna Edward's amendment has 24 co-sponsors, eight of them fellow members of the Congressional Black Caucus. Other, more timid voices on Capitol Hill favor requiring corporate shareholders to approve of their managements' political and campaign contributions. But Republicans are certain to demand that unions be forced to seek rank-and-file permission for every contribution labor makes to political campaigns  - a totally unacceptable and unequal trade-off.

Other congressional Democrats speak of strengthening the system of public financing of election campaigns. But to be effective, public financing would have to match corporate contributions on something approaching dollar for dollar, which could go into the billions, since the sky is the limit for corporate campaign spending under the Supreme Court's ruling. In addition, President Obama relinquished any moral authority on that score, when he abandoned public financing once he realized he could raise more money than John McCain - including corporate money.

Thus, there is no alternative but to go the route of Constitutional amendment, with no guarantee of success at the end of that long road. But, as Congresswoman Edwards says, history and the Supreme Court have left us no choice.

For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford. On the web, go to www.BlackAgendaReport.com.

BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford@BlackAgendaReport.com.


More Stories


  • Direct from Western Sahara: Learn About the Struggle of the Last Colony in Africa
    Michele de Mello
    Direct from Western Sahara: Learn About the Struggle of the Last Colony in Africa
    25 Jan 2023
    After 30 years of peace, the Polisario Front holds its 16th Congress amidst the war against Morocco’s invasion.
  • Protests in Breakaway Somaliland Call for Reunification with Somalia
    Pavan Kulkarni
    Protests in Breakaway Somaliland Call for Reunification with Somalia
    25 Jan 2023
    Even as the US and UK are increasingly legitimizing secessionist rule in Somaliland, whose sovereignty has no international recognition, a unionist movement seeking a united Somalia threatens to…
  • Viewing Ukraine Through the Davos Lens
    Conor Gallagher
    Viewing Ukraine Through the Davos Lens
    25 Jan 2023
    Why have Europe's politicians followed U.S. dictates regarding Ukraine and undermined the wellbeing of their own nations? The influence wielded by the World Economic Forum's Young Global…
  • Women in Nicaragua: Power and Protagonism – Delegation Report-Back (January 2023)
    Alliance for Global Justice
    Women in Nicaragua: Power and Protagonism – Delegation Report-Back (January 2023)
    25 Jan 2023
    The United States has targeted Nicaragua ever since the days of Ronald Reagan. Members of a recent delegation made observations that are far different from hostile narratives presented by the U.S.…
  • EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell says that calling Israel an apartheid state is anti-Semitic. 
    Ali Abunimah
    EU Says It’s Anti-Semitic to Call Israel an Apartheid State
    25 Jan 2023
    EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell says that calling Israel an apartheid state is anti-Semitic.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us