Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire

Americans Tip Their Hand on Iraq Oil
21 Feb 2007
🖨️ Print Article

Americans Tip Their Hand on Iraq Oil

 
 

"If a nation's government cannot influence the export and price of its most vital commodity, then that nation is no longer sovereign."

 
 

OilScapeGOOD The latest version of the proposed Iraq oil law, drawn up by Americans and now before the cabinet of the Iraqi government, is a document like none other on the planet. Essentially, it would eliminate the Iraqi central government's role in guiding the development of the nation's most precious asset, oil. Instead, various regions and sub-regions would line up to offer multinational corporations the best terms for oil exploration and drilling deals; in other words, Iraqis would be compelled to underbid each other in a process that can only result in huge advantages to the oil companies. Indeed the law seems designed to encourage the dismemberment of Iraq, with every region free to pursue its own deals with foreigners. If ever there were a law that embodied the principle of "divide and rule," it's this one.

 
 

The proposed law would allow oil companies to lock Iraqis into 35-year agreements, and would forbid the central government from deciding how much oil is pumped out of Iraqi soil. That means Iraq, the second or third largest reservoir of oil in the world, could no longer be a part of OPEC, the organization of oil-producing countries, whose main reason for existing is to regulate oil supplies and, thereby, the price of oil on the world market. If a nation's government cannot influence the export and price of its most vital commodity, then that nation is no longer sovereign.

 
 

"Having failed to make Iraq a de facto colony of the United States, the Americans believe that divide and rule is the next best thing."

 
 

But of course, the Iraqi government is not sovereign; it is a gaggle of factions headquartered in Baghdad's American Green Zone fortress, in the midst of a civil war in which the various factions jockey for favor with the foreign occupier. Each faction and sub-faction seeks wartime advantage through American money, weapons and favor. Having failed to make Iraq a de facto colony of the United States, the Americans believe that divide and rule is the next best thing. But even if the Iraqi cabinet OKs the American-crafted document, the law will not survive the current conflict. Whoever comes out on top will be forced to renounce the law, or face the wrath of every other Iraqi whose patrimony has been signed away to foreigners. Of that, I am certain.

 
 

In the end, the oil companies won't win this game, either. Big Oil does not prosper when chaos reaches levels that threaten the reliability of production. In the current Iraqi situation, the oil law is a recipe for endless chaos, as regions and localities and factions and sub-factions combine and divide in battles for control of scattered oil pools and processing facilities.

 
 

Multinational corporations would prefer to control the price and availability of oil, themselves. But, failing that, they would rather deal with strong national states that can guarantee order and stability. The Iraq oil law was first drawn up in U.S. corporate boardrooms when it was assumed that the overthrow of Saddam Hussein would pacify the country, allowing American oil executives to create a heaven on earth for their own profit. That dream is long gone, and the signatures on a piece of paper of Iraqi faction leaders posing as a government, cannot bring it back. If the Americans think they can achieve by legalistic trickery, that which they could not win through war, they are crazy. But then, we already knew that.

 
 

For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Glen Ford.

 

BAR Executive Editor Glen Ford can be contacted at Glen.Ford (at) BlackAgendaReport.com.


More Stories


  • nato protest
    Ann Garrison, BAR Contributing Editor
    NATO Was Founded to Crush Communist, Socialist, and Anti-colonial Movements Worldwide
    16 Apr 2025
    NATO was never a good idea gone wrong. It was founded to crush communist, socialist, and anti-colonial movements in Europe and around the world.
  • Jon Jeter
    The Dog Whistle Heard ‘Round the World: How Timothy McVeigh’s Oklahoma City Bombing Birthed the Trump Era
    16 Apr 2025
    Thirty years after Timothy McVeigh’s Oklahoma City bombing, his legacy lives on in the racist mass shooters, anti-government extremists, and MAGA reactionaries who continue to target Black…
  • ​​​​​​​ Ajamu Baraka, BAR editor and columnist , Claudia O'Brien Moscoso , Anthony Karefa Rogers-Wright
    A Snapshot of the Global War Against African People: Reflections From Ecuador
    16 Apr 2025
    Defying Ecuador’s attempt to bar international monitors, election observers documented how Daniel Noboa’s contested victory, secured amid militarized polling stations and state violence, escalates…
  • Too Black , Rasul Mowatt
    Bootleg Rehab: Still Laundering Black Rage
    16 Apr 2025
    DEI isn’t dead—it was never alive to begin with. A corporate pacification project dressed as progress, it launders Black rage into diversity statements while police budgets grow and material…
  • NBROC Coordinating Committee
    Grounding Our Purpose: The Second National Black Radical Organizing Conference
    16 Apr 2025
    The Second National Black Radical Organizing Conference (NBROC) continues the legacy of Black radical resistance, uniting organizers to confront imperialism, capitalism, and white supremacy while…
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us