War on Drugs = War on Minorities
by Arianna Huffington
This article originally appeared in the Los
Angeles Times.
"The silence coming from Clinton and Obama is particularly
deafening."
There is subject being forgotten in the 2008 Democratic race for the White
House.
While all the major candidates are vying for the black and Latino vote, they
are completely ignoring one of the most pressing issues affecting those
constituencies: the failed "war on drugs" - a war that has morphed
into a war on people of color.
Consider this: According to a 2006 report by the American Civil Liberties
Union, African Americans make up an estimated 15% of drug users, but they
account for 37% of those arrested on drug charges, 59% of those convicted and
74% of all drug offenders sentenced to prison. Or consider this: The U.S. has
260,000 people in state prisons on nonviolent drug charges; 183,200 (more than 70%) of them are black or Latino.
Such facts have been bandied about for years. But our politicians have
consistently failed to take action on what has become yet another third rail of
American politics, a subject to be avoided at all costs by elected officials
who fear being incinerated on contact for being soft on crime.
Perhaps you hoped this would change during a spirited Democratic presidential
primary? Unfortunately, a quick search of the top Democratic hopefuls' websites
reveals that not one of them - not Hillary Clinton, not Barack Obama, not John
Edwards, not Joe Biden, not Chris Dodd, not Bill Richardson - even mentions the drug war, let alone offers any
solutions.
"The U.S. has 260,000 people in state prisons on nonviolent drug
charges; 183,200 (more than 70%) of them are black or Latino."
The silence coming from Clinton and Obama is particularly deafening.
Obama has written eloquently about his own struggle with drugs but has not
addressed the tragic effect the war on drugs is having on African American
communities.
As for Clinton, she flew into Selma, Ala., to reinforce her image as the wife
of the black community's most beloved politician and has made much of her plan
to attract female voters, but she has ignored the suffering of poor, black
women right in her own backyard.
Located down the road from her Chappaqua, N.Y., home are two prisons housing
female inmates, Taconic and Bedford. Forty-eight percent of the women in
Taconic are there for nonviolent drug offenses; 78% of those in the prison are
African American or Latino.
And Bedford, the state's only maximum-security prison for women, is home to
some of the worst victims of New York's draconian Rockefeller-era drug laws -
mothers and grandmothers whose first brush with the law resulted in their being
locked away for 15 years or more on nonviolent drug charges.
Yet even though these prisons are so nearby, Clinton has turned a blind eye to
the plight of the women locked away there, notably refusing to speak out on
their behalf.
Avoidance of this issue comes at a very stiff price (and not just the more than
$50 billion a year we're spending on the failed drug war). The toll is paid in
shattered families, devastated inner cities and wasted lives (with no apologies
for using that term).
During the 10 years I've been writing about the injustice of the drug war, I've
repeatedly watched as politicians paid lip service to the problem but then
ducked as the sickening status quo claimed more victims. Here in California, of
the 171,000 inmates jamming our wildly overcrowded prisons, 36,000 are
nonviolent drug offenders.
"Federal sentencing guidelines dictate that judges impose the
same five-year prison sentence for possession of five grams of crack or 500
grams of powder cocaine."
I remember in 1999 asking Dan Bartlett, then the campaign spokesman for
candidate George W. Bush, about Bush's position on the outrageous disparity
between the sentences meted out for possession of crack cocaine and those given
for possession of powder cocaine - a disparity that has helped fill U.S.
prisons with black low-level drug users (80% of sentenced crack defendants are
black). Federal sentencing guidelines dictate that judges impose the same
five-year prison sentence for possession of five grams of crack or 500 grams of
powder cocaine.
"The different sentencing for crack cocaine and powder cocaine is
something that there's no doubt needs to be addressed," Bartlett told me.
But in the more than six years since Bush and Bartlett moved into the White
House, the problem has gone unaddressed. No doubt about it.
Maybe the president will suddenly wake up and decide to take on the issue five
days before he leaves office. That's what Bill Clinton did, writing a 2001 New
York Times Op-Ed article in which he trumpeted the need to "immediately
reduce the disparity between crack and powder cocaine sentences" -
conveniently ignoring the fact that he had the power to solve it for eight
years and did nothing.
When it mattered, he maintained an imperial silence. Then, when it didn't, he
became Captain Courageous. And he lamented the failures of our drug policy as
though he had been an innocent bystander rather than the chief executive
(indeed, the prison population doubled on his watch).
"In Florida, one in three black men is
permanently disqualified from voting."
There's a talking point Hillary and Obama should adopt. It's both the right
thing and the smart thing. Because of disenfranchisement statutes, large
numbers of black men who were convicted of drug crimes are ineligible to vote,
even those who have fully paid their debt to society.
A 2000 study found that 1.4 million African American men - 13% of the total
black male population - were unable to vote in the 2000 election because of
state laws barring felons access to the polls. In Florida, one in three black
men is permanently disqualified from voting. Think that might have made a
difference in the 2000 race? Our shortsighted drug laws have become the 21st
century manifestation of Jim Crow.
Shouldn't this be an issue Democratic presidential candidates deem worthy of
their attention?
Arianna Huffington is the editor in chief of huffingtonpost.com.
BAR Poet-in-Residence, Raymond Nat Turner, joins us from New York City to talk about his work and an upcoming performance with his group, Upsurge New York City.
Gerald Perreira of Organization for the Victory of the People in Guyana joins us to discuss the long running territorial dispute with neighboring Venezuela and the increasing activity of U.S. in theā¦
Any sign of even tiny opposition is enough to send Israel into a frenzy of bloodletting. Hospital attacks, murders of aid workers, violations of the sovereignty of embassies, are all par for theā¦
The statement on the UN Partition of Palestine by the Arab Higher Committee is a reminder of the sordid history of the U.S. in the expropriation of land and the attempted ethnic cleansing of theā¦
The totalitarian state of Rwanda is guilty of many forms of transnational repression, including the lawfare exemplified in the case of Eric Nshimiye.
