Black Agenda Report
Black Agenda Report
News, commentary and analysis from the black left.

  • Home
  • Africa
  • African America
  • Education
  • Environment
  • International
  • Media and Culture
  • Political Economy
  • Radio
  • US Politics
  • War and Empire
  • omnibus

Public Broadband Maps Must Expose Digital Redlining To End the Digital Divide
Bill Quigley
08 Apr 2009

A BA Radio Commentary by Bruce Dixon

ou tell me?Click the flash player to hear or the mic below to download a broadcast quality MP3 of this BA Radio commentary

mic.

 President Obama pledged the extension of low-cost broadband would be a high priority of his administration.  But Verizon, Comcast and other players seek to privatize the broadband mapping process and freeze in place the digital divide forever.

 

Public Broadband Census Must Expose Digital Redlining To End the Digital Divide

 

A BA Radio Commentary by Bruce Dixon

In the 21st century, cheap, fast and ubiquitous internet access is already as vital to local economic development as paved streets and roads were in the centuries before. Communities where broadband is scarce and expensive will continue to miss out on education and government services. They will be medically underserved. Fewer new businesses will be started in those areas and fewer existing business will move there. Communities where internet access is slow, expensive and hard to get, in the 21st century will be economic backwaters where growth in jobs, wages and wealth will be slower than everywhere else.

President Obama promised that ending the digital redlining of poor and minority communities, and ensuring the availability of cheap, fast broadband internet to the rural, small town and big city neighborhoods inhabited by minorities and the poor would be among his administration's first and highest priorities. The obvious first step in keeping that promise is a reliable, accurate and public broadband census which will reveal just where broadband is scarce, expensive or unavailable, along with the routes, locations and capacities of all existing and planned fiber optic and other lines.

The obvious problem with that first step is that cable and phone companies don't want a broadband census. They are fighting it tooth and nail, and since they're also among the biggest TV, news and radio gatekeepers, they are able to keep discussion of it out of the news. These greedy, self-interested corporations created the digital divide for their own profitability and they have no desire to see it go away. The market-driven business models of cable and telecom corporations have been remarkably consistent since the nineteenth century. They focus on creating artificial scarcities, delivering premium service to lucrative upscale markets and avoiding low-cost universal service wherever possible. After a tidal wave of public outrage built over decades buying laws that protected telephone monopolies, allowing them to deny and preventing others from selling phone service to millions, universal service to small towns, rural areas, the poor and senior citizens was forced upon them by government action in the first half of the twentieth century. The corporate brand names and communications technologies have been transformed, but neither the underlying business models nor the corporate greed and scorn for the public good have changed one iota.

Since a broadband census will reveal the extent of digital redlining, price fixing and other abuses, the cable and phone companies are resisting it on many fronts. On one hand, they are lobbying the federal government to redefine excluded and underserved communities out of existence. On another, they are insisting that a private contractor, Connected Nation, on whose board execs from Verizon, Comcast, AT&T and other digital redliners sit, ought to conduct the broadband mapping, and that all the useful data gathered should be their private property, not disclosed to the public. This is worse than a joke.

Broadband mapping must be done by a public body, accountable to the public, with all processes and data exposed to public scrutiny. The telecom corporations can't be trusted to choose the digital destines of our communities. They're the ones who gave us the digital divide in the first place. The FCC will be accepting public comments on the broadband mapping process till April 17, and there is much more information available on the current state of the digital divide and the solutions at hand in a new report called “Wired Less; Disconnected In Urban America.” You can find “Wired Less: Disconnected in Urban America at the web site of Free Press, www.freepress.net, that's www.freepress.net.

For Black Agenda Radio, I'm Bruce Dixon.

 

Do you need and appreciate Black Agenda Report articles. Please click on the DONATE icon, and help us out, if you can.


More Stories


  • Attack Against Haiti’s De Facto Prime Minister on Independence Day (+Core Group)
    José Manuel Blanco Diaz
    Attack Against Haiti’s De Facto Prime Minister on Independence Day (+Core Group)
    04 Jan 2022
    The Core Group chose Ariel Henry as the de-factor president of Haiti, in defiance of the people's wishes. But a conflict among factions makes his position insecure and resulted in a recent assa
  • MLK Day at Camp Lemonnier, US Army
    T.J. Coles
    Using and Abusing Djibouti: How the US Transformed a Tiny African state Into a Hub of Imperial Aggression
    04 Jan 2022
    From Djibouti, the US trains proxies and bombs strategically-important countries in the name of democracy and counterterrorism.
  • Why We Must Defend Julian Assange
    Margaret Kimberley, BAR Executive Editor and Senior Columnist
    Why We Must Defend Julian Assange
    14 Dec 2021
    Julian Assange is one of the political prisoners that the US claims not to have.
  • Essay: Lynch Law in America, Ida B. Wells-Barnett, 1900
    Black Agenda Review
    Essay: Lynch Law in America, Ida B. Wells-Barnett, 1900
    14 Dec 2021
    Ida B. Wells-Barnett’s “Lynch Law in America” remains a compelling account of white violence as both savage and systemic, and of the US as irredeemable.
  • On the Fundamental Differences Between Capitalist “Democracy” and Socialist Democracy
    Danny Haiphong , BAR contributor
    On the Fundamental Differences Between Capitalist “Democracy” and Socialist Democracy
    14 Dec 2021
    The United States recent democracy summit would have been laughable if its implications were not so serious.
  • Load More
Subscribe
connect with us
about us
contact us