Freedom
Rider: Marianne Pearl is Black
by
Margaret Kimberley
"A white actor is portraying a black
character."
When Wall
Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl was kidnapped in Pakistan in 2002 his
wife, Marianne, became a fixture in international media. The first time I saw
her I made a very simple observation. "His wife is black," I said to myself. I
know a black person when I see one, and I saw one in Marianne Pearl. In the new
film A Mighty Heart, Pearl is portrayed by actress Angelina Jolie. Jolie
is white.
Here we
are in the 21st century and a white actor is portraying a black character. Not
just any character, but a real life, well-known, still living human being.
Anyone who sees Marianne Pearl knows she isn't white, but the powers that be in
Hollywood didn't care and knew they could get away with this offensive charade.
Marianne
Pearl was born in France to a Cuban mother and a Dutch father. Her mother was
quite obviously black, photos are unambiguous on that point. Her father was
European, so she can be described as multi-racial or biracial. It doesn't
really matter what term or words Pearl uses to describe herself. She is clearly
a person of African ancestry, and putting dark make up and a curly wig on
Angelina Jolie doesn't change that fact or fool anyone.
The days
of white actors using various makeup techniques to play non-white people should
be over in the new millennium. Who can forget Marlon Brando portraying an
Okinawan or John Wayne as Genghis Khan. Those days should be long gone and
consigned to the dust bin of Hollywood's shameful history.
"Putting dark make up and a curly wig on Angelina Jolie
doesn't change that fact or fool anyone."
In the old
days, white actors always played light-skinned black characters who could
"pass" for white. Films such as Pinky and Imitation of Life are
historic examples of that phenomenon. We now have a white person portraying a
not so light skinned, obviously black, living person. It seems that Hollywood
is becoming less enlightened with time.
Of course,
it didn't hurt Jolie that her boyfriend Brad Pitt produced the movie. Because
Pitt is a bankable star and producer, he can get whatever he wants. If he had
insisted on having an actress of color portray a woman of color he could have
gotten that too. It isn't clear if he was motivated by the desire for familial
bliss, "color doesn't count, can't we all get along, kumbayah" fantasy, bigger
bucks at the box office, or all of the above.
Pearl and
Jolie are just fine with the arrangement, and why not. Jolie gets a role she
wanted and Pearl gets to see her story on the silver screen. Both are defensive
about the casting criticisms and plead with the peasantry to remain silent.
"I
know that people are frustrated at the lack of great roles [for people of
color], but I think they've picked the wrong example here," Jolie opined.
Why is this example wrong? Is it because honesty and integrity would have
denied her the part? If Jolie can possibly think of a reason why the rest of us
should just shut up and accept modern day blackface she needs to come up with a
better explanation.
"If Brad Pitt had insisted on having an actress of color
portray a woman of color he could have gotten that."
Marianne
Pearl also thinks that critics should bite their tongues. "This is not
about skin color. I wanted her to play me because I trust her. Aren't we past
this?" Who is we? Hollywood endlessly promotes white people and their
image. If they aren't "past" the business of telling the world that only white
people are acceptable, beautiful, and noble, then the rest of us shouldn't be
"past" demanding that our images be shown, especially if the image in question
is that of a living individual who is obviously not the same race as the actor
playing the part.
Pearl's
acquiescence is no reason for other black people to think that this throwback
to Hollywood's dark ages, pun intended, should be acceptable. She is not free
to instruct the rest of the African ancestored world how we should react when
our very presence is denied and our image is erased. The story of a pregnant
journalist whose husband is kidnapped and beheaded tugs at the heart strings.
Apparently the deal makers in Hollywood feared that those heart strings wouldn't
be moved if one black or multiracial person portrayed another.
Last but
not least, Pitt and Jolie should not be given a pass for their white washing
endeavor. They have adopted Asian and African children and given birth to one
on the African continent. They may get brownie points for having a multiracial
family, but that shouldn't protect them from criticism when they tell us not to
believe our lying eyes.
Margaret Kimberley's
Freedom Rider column appears weekly in BAR. Ms. Kimberley lives in New York
City, and can be reached via e-Mail at
Margaret.Kimberley(at)BlackAgandaReport.Com. Ms. Kimberley' maintains an
edifying and frequently updated blog at freedomrider.blogspot.com. More
of her work is also available at her Black Agenda Report archive
page.
This week Pan Africanism and the Black Panther Party were on your minds.
Unlike the US and other corporate-ruled countries, activists inside and outside of government collaborated to bring about radical social change in Venezuela.
“Black freedom” as a claim, as a possibility, challenges us to imagine and to produce new modes of life.
That all this time later we are still learning new information about Hampton’s killing is testament to the sheer volume of the effort aimed at this young revolutionary.
Well-meaning whites think its quite alright to steal Black activists’ words – as long as their intentions are good, which is up to them to decide.
