Let's imagine for a moment that the Congressional Black Caucus's Annual Legislative Conference is exactly what its relentless self-congratulatory hype says it is --- the annual gathering of black America's best and brightest, focusing their energies on racial and societal uplift. Just what would that look like, anyway? What would a yearly, agenda-setting conference of black America's top-drawer dreamers and doers, its leaders, achievers and organizers in dozens of fields of endeavor actually do every September?
What new insights into the nation's and our people's problems would CBC Week offer in this alternative world? What old and new strategies and tactics would it map out and implement for pressing problems like the ubiquitous national policies of racially selective policing, prosecution and mass incarceration? What sorts of legislative and extra-legislative campaigns would it map out to tackle HIV-AIDS worldwide and race-based health disparities at home? How would it see that the black community's deep and widespread skepticism of empire and imperial wars, is distinctly heard in the national conversation? What alternatives would the CBC ALC offer to this society's prevailing and only model of urban economic development --- moving poorer, often black people off coveted urban real estate and moving wealthier residents in? And how would the CBC's ALC in this imagined world, have responded to the crime of ethnic cleansing of the Gulf Coast in the wake of Hurricane Katrina?
If the brightest lights of black America turned their attention to the questions of racially selective policing, prosecution and disproportionate incarceration rates, they might recommend measures such as the elimination and sunset of all mandatory minimum sentences and two and three strikes legislation on the state and federal levels. Being grown folks, they would be keenly aware that the prison - industrial complex has powerful friends, and that the plans for turning around these failed public policies would go far beyond mere lobbying to include a massive campaign of public persuasion and education to stretch if necessary, a decade or two into the future.
Farfetched? Maybe not when you recall the legal strategy to overturn Jim Crow, was conceived by Charles Hamilton Houston in the 1930s and carried through more than 20 years by a team of attorneys eventually headed by Thurgood Marshall, and that extralegal strategies of civil disobedience were pushed during all the 1950s and 1960s.
Black America, like the rest of America only more so, whenever the alternatives are described to them in detail, favors the same kind of single payer health care system every other advanced industrial country in the world uses to provide universal care for its citizens. In our alternative world, a CBC ALC focused on pushing health care agendas that serve the CBC's voting constituency would further popularize the news that half of all bankruptcies in the US are due to unpayable medical bills, often incurred by families who were "insured" at the onset of their illnesses. Surely it would devote at least one of its "braintrust" workshops to put together Physicians for a National Health Care Plan with the predominantly black National Medical Association, and mobilize black communities for actions to demand national, universal single payer health care.
A CBC ALC agenda on the global HIV-AIDS epidemic would certainly include a public exposure of how US drug companies and US trade policies conspire to keep the price of life-saving retroviral and other drugs too high for millions in Africa, Latin America, Asia and here in the US. Thanks to these policies, less than half the planet's HIV-AIDS cases get any treatment at all.
When pollsters sampled black opinion at the eve of the Iraq war, 70% of African Americans were in opposition to the invasion of Iraq, a proportion nearly three times as high as among whites. A CBC ALC intent upon making the political will of black America felt on the national stage would be intently concerned on what African Americans in particular can do to ensure that the troops come home, and that fewer, not more of the nation's resources are diverted to the Pentagon, which already consumes more than the rest of the world's military expenditures combined.