Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.  If you broadcast our audio commentaries please consider a recurring donation to Black Agenda Report.

Obamacare’s Empty Victory

  • Sharebar
    Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

    By Dr. Margaret Flowers

    Millions of Obama voters in 2008 imagined they voted for universal health. What they got instead was Obamacare, an incredibly complex thicket of laws, regulations and exceptions requiring millions to purchase private health insurance which might or might not provide adequate or affordable coverage, might or might not protect them from bankruptcy, but certainly privatizes more of the nation's health care system than ever before.

    Obamacare's Empty Victory

    By Dr. Margaret Flowers

    Originally published in the May 2, 2014 Indypendent

    “...we had a choice to make. We could stay on the same path toward a market-based health care system or take an evidence-based approach and create national single payer health insurance.”

    It feels truly Orwellian that progressives are applauding the forced purchase of private health insurance — one of the most hated industries in the United States — while the right is opposing a model that originated from their political leaders. The Affordable Care Act (ACA) is a step farther on the path to total privatization of our health care system, not towards the health care system that most Americans support: single payer Medicare for all.

    In the months leading up to the March 31 deadline to obtain health insurance, ACA supporters united around their mission to enroll people. Volunteers knocked on doors and tabled in their communities. Celebrities and athletes tweeted and labor unions ran robocalls. The media buzzed with speculation about whether the ACA would succeed or fail. March 31 felt like election night. And after it was over, ACA supporters clapped each other on the back and celebrated.

    Obamacare survived. But now that the law is implemented and the dust is settling, it’s time to question what this actually means for health care and what we should do now.

    Before President Obama was elected in 2008, Drs. David Himmelstein and Steffie Woolhandler, two of the co-founders of Physicians for a National Health Program, raised a crucial question in their report, “Our Health Care System at the Crossroads: Single Payer or Market Reform?” They outlined the health care crisis and how past reforms were taking us toward increasingly “threadbare insurance coverage.” Knowing that health care reform would be front and center for the next few years, they argued that as a nation, we had a choice to make. We could stay on the same path toward a market-based health care system or take an evidence-based approach and create national single payer health insurance.

    The ACA is transferring hundreds of billions of public dollars to the private insurance industry to subsidize plans that leave people underinsured, unable to afford care and at risk of financial ruin if they have a serious accident or illness

    With the ACA, we have now passed that crossroads and are headed down the road to a completely market-based system of privatized health care. This is not something to celebrate. Dr. Adam Gaffney recently wrote an excellent history in Jacobin on the turn we have taken away from the concepts of universal health care and economic justice to a neoliberal model. We are inundated with market rhetoric telling us how wonderful it is to have the choice of shiny silver insurance in the brand new marketplace. Insurance plans are called products and we are consumers of them.

    The problem with these public relations messages is that having health insurance doesn’t guarantee access to health care and health care doesn’t belong in the marketplace. As patients, we do not have a choice of whether or not to purchase health care when we need it. Delaying or avoiding necessary care can and does have serious consequences. And we can’t predict how much health care we will need or when we’ll need it. In a market-based system, profits are the bottom line and people receive only the amount of health care they can afford, not what they need.

    The ACA is transferring hundreds of billions of public dollars to the private insurance industry to subsidize plans that leave people underinsured, unable to afford care and at risk of financial ruin if they have a serious accident or illness. And even at its best, tens of millions of people will remain without insurance.

    Most of the 7.5 million people who purchased health insurance on the exchanges were already insured. More than 80 percent bought the lower-tier silver, bronze or catastrophic plans with the hope that they would not get sick. These plans have the lowest premiums but require that patients pay thousands of dollars out of pocket before insurance kicks in, and then pay 30 to 40 percent of the cost of covered care. The result is that underinsured people will continue to self-ration, delay or avoid care due to cost, as 80 million of us did in 2012.

    The ACA includes regulations, but as usual the insurance industry has ways to work around them. Many insurers had caps on out-of-pocket costs waived. Insurers also found a way to “cherry pick” the healthiest customers by leaving cancer centers and major medical centers out of their networks. In fact, most of the new plans have narrow and ultra-narrow networks that shift more of the cost of care onto patients because care outside of insurance networks isn’t covered. And while insurance companies cannot drop individuals when they get sick, they can stop selling their plans in areas that don’t make a profit. Some are already doing this, which means the competition that was supposed to emerge did not. Instead, in 515 of the poorest counties in 15 states, only one insurance company is available on the health exchange. And greater consolidation of the health care system is underway through mergers and acquisitions.

    Our public insurances, Medicaid and Medicare, are being increasingly taken over by private insurances in the form of Managed Care Organizations and Medicare Advantage. They compete for the healthiest patients and siphon more of the health dollars for profit, salaries and administration than public insurances. Top advisors to the White House expect our public plans to be rolled into the health exchanges in the near future with subsidies, a plan similar to Congressman Paul Ryan’s voucher proposal.

    Nations that treat health care as a public good and not a commodity have universal coverage that costs less and produces better health outcomes. And in polls, some two thirds of Americans support single payer. Now our tasks is to shift the national debate away from how many people have insurance to what type of health care system we support. Efforts to do this are taking place at both state and national levels.

    State efforts to educate and organize for universal health systems are using a human rights framework. This started with the Health Care is a Human Right campaign in Vermont that is working to create universal coverage, and similar organizing is happening in Maine, Pennsylvania and Maryland. An essential component of this organizing model is to develop leadership within communities that are uninsured or underinsured. States such as Washington, Oregon, Colorado and New Mexico also use human rights messaging in their campaigns.

    “The ACA is as good as it gets, when it comes to basing a health care system on private insurance, and it is simply not good enough....”

    State health reform faces significant barriers because federal legislation is needed to allow the creation of a state single payer system. However, state campaigns are essential because they push state health policy to be the strongest it can be and build an informed and organized grassroots movement that can also push for solutions at the national level.

    Legislation for single payer health systems exists in Congress. In the House, Congressman John Conyers (D-MI) has introduced HR 676, “The Expanded and Improved Medicare for All Act,” in every session since 2003. So far it has 56 co-sponsors. In late 2013, Senator Bernie Sanders (I-VT) introduced SB 1782, “The American Health Security Act,” in the Senate. National organizations are working together to encourage more members to sponsor them and a national lobby day is happening in Washington, D.C., on May 22.

    On a personal level, I have chosen to be a conscientious objector to the ACA. I cannot in good conscience give my support to the very industry I am trying to eliminate. Being a conscientious objector is a decision that people have to make for themselves. So far nearly 500 people have joined me by signing a petition at PopularResistance.org.

    Some people speculate that the ACA will bring us to single payer some day because it will fail. This will only happen if we fight for it. Every day that we delay, people suffer and die in this country unnecessarily. Neil H. Buchanan says it best, “The ACA is as good as it gets, when it comes to basing a health care system on private insurance, and it is simply not good enough. Even as the ACA takes effect, therefore, we need to start planning to make it disappear.”

    Margaret Flowers is a pediatrician and co-chair of the Maryland chapter of Physicians for a National Health Plan. She serves on the board of Healthcare-Now and of the Maryland Health Care is a Human Right campaign. She is also an editor at popularresistance.org.

    - See more at: http://www.indypendent.org/2014/05/02/obamacare%E2%80%99s-empty-victory#sthash.JKFTFYPm.dpuf

    Share this

    louis vuitton outlet

    Louis vuitton handbags my partner and i Tiffany jewelry we Cheap jordans never thought Michael Kors Canada i always MK handbags outlet ended up being Michael kors stores in reality Michael kors handbags outlet folks Michael kors outlet online about- Cheap Michael Kors screen louis vuitton sale or perhaps monogrammed Louis Vuitton Canada Sale very small Louis Vuitton uk temperature is Louis Vuitton Outlet UK very quickly Replica Louis Vuitton UK cropping Oakley Sunglasses UK in place Louis Vuitton UK Outlet regardless of whether Louis Vuitton Replica many of us Michael Kors Outlet UK ray Louis Vuitton Sale ready Michael kors canada eliminate Louis Vuitton Outlet it is. Michael Kors Handbags Canada that features Replica Louis Vuitton sunstruck Louis Vuitton Outlet surroundings Cheap Michael Kors on the agenda, Oakley Sunglasses uk this really is Oakley Sunglasses Outlet time for you to Michael Kors Purses get started Cheap MK Sale planning replica Oakley Sunglasses intended for Cheap Oakley Sunglasses online style of Cheap Michael Kors for Sale informal Replica Louis Vuitton Handbags all the time Michael kors sale sweeping Michael Kors UK bags Oakley UK everyone Louis Vuitton Outlet UK lmost all LV Outlet be shipping. louis vuitton outlet normally, tiffany jewelry canada When i New Air Jordan online michael MK handbags cheap placing MK handbags outlet around the Michael kors stores effective Michael kors for sale get Michael kors factory outlet carry Michael Kors Cheap which frequently Cheap louis vuitton canada sale ersus Michael Kors Outlet suitable for http://www.himag.co.uk/uk.asp partnering Louis Vuitton UK combined with Cheap LV Handbags UK or perhaps Wholesale Oakley Online more modern Louis Vuitton UK Online hot Louis Vuitton Replica Sale time of year’ MK Cheap Handbags s Louis Vuitton Wholesale jeans Louis Vuitton Free Shipping as well as Michael Kors Discount enjoy Wholesale Michael Kors the new Louis Vuitton Handbags Sale see-through time.

    Obamacare has already proved to be a complete failure

    In the course of the time Obamacare has already proved to be a complete failure from various points of view, it has cost the nation more than 700  million tax-payers dollars, takes more than 2000 pages of legislation and finally is blamed for poor management. Somebody just makes fortunes on this project, while the others can only afford treatment at the cost of personal money loans for emergency cases. Though it claimed to be affordable, now we already see it has nothing to do with this declaration.

    Obamacare

    Obamacare is one of the well known and popular health policies in the United States of America. Most probably Obamacare is the only solution of health policy in America; but due to lack of proper resources; we are facing different types of loopholes which indicates towards a low profile health policy. Obamacare helps to develop the current health care strategies and it allows people to get suitable health insurance policies.

    emergency medical care Gulfport, MS

    You are revolting.

    You are revolting.

    FYI: +93% of Blacks Voted for White Southerner Bill Clinton Too

    And white northerners Walter Mondale & Geraldine Ferraro got 85% of the Black vote [even after a contentious race w Jesse Jackson], but they got less than 40% of the white vote. Thus over twice as many Black women [by percentage] voted for Ms Ferraro than even her fellow white women did.

    So yeah Obama got 95% of the Black vote in 2012, along w 70% of Hispanic voters, & 65% of Asian American votes. But in 2012 Obama barely got 40% of the white vote [just 33% of white men & only 44% of white women], Yet ya'll want to take all the credit for him even being elected, cause he symbolizes that mythical place IE: so-called 'post-racial' USA [NOT!]. IMO you likely did NOT vote for either Obama, Clinton, Mondale nor Carter. I'd doubt that you've ever voted for anyone besides a fellow 'Good Ole {white}Boy' politician. 

    FYI: Black voters have been voting for white dudes both Dim & Repugs since the enactment of the 15 Amendment after the end of the Civil War. So what's really your point, besides coming here to BAR & to insult Black people, w your thinly disguised racial diatribes???

    Clicky Web Analytics