Media Coverage of Reproductive Rights Should Include Women of Color

Submitted by Nadra Kareem Nittle on Tue, 05/22/2012 - 21:28
Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

 

by Nadra Kareem Nittle

Lots of people have a great deal to say about high rates of unplanned Black and Latina pregnancies. But few media outlets bother to ask poor Black and brown women’s opinions and perspectives on the subject. The same applies to minority young people. “Black teens, for example, are twice as likely as whites or Latinos to develop a sexually transmitted infection.”

 

Media Coverage of Reproductive Rights Should Include Women of Color

by Nadra Kareem Nittle

This article originally appeared in the Maynard Media Center on Structural Inequity.

Black women are three times as likely as white women to have an unplanned pregnancy, and Hispanic women are two times as likely.”

Social wedge issues such as abortion, birth control and sex education in public schools have taken center stage and sometimes dominated the political debate this year, but progressive experts on reproductive rights are concerned that women of color are rarely represented in the mainstream media’s coverage.

If elected president, presumptive Republican candidate Mitt Romney has vowed to defund Planned Parenthood, a move that the state of Texas is attempting. Moreover, Tennessee has passed legislation to severely limit what educators can teach in sex education classes, and states such as Arizona, Mississippi and Virginia have passed legislation that significantly restricts abortion access.

Conservative attacks on reproductive rights repeatedly make headlines. But women of color and low-income women who disproportionately depend on the services of Planned Parenthood and face challenges accessing reproductive care have not figured prominently in mainstream news coverage of the reproductive rights debate.

Experts on the topic say that because underprivileged women have the most to lose as lawmakers curb such rights, the media should focus on them in the discussion.

Women who are poor and also women of color have disproportionately high rates of unwanted pregnancy,” says Heather Boonstra, a senior public policy associate of the Guttmacher Institute, a Washington, D.C., organization that advocates for sexual and reproductive health and rights.

Some of that has to do with the basics in terms of obtaining health care and the kinds of social conditions in the women’s lives that make it hard for them to use contraception and use it consistently,” she says. “Poorer women — their lives have a lot of disruptions. Using and obtaining contraception, let alone affording it and getting it on a routine basis is harder.”

Women of color and low-income women who disproportionately depend on the services of Planned Parenthood.”

According to the institute, black women are three times as likely as white women to have an unplanned pregnancy, and Hispanic women are two times as likely. Among poor women, Hispanics have the highest rate of unplanned pregnancy. In addition, financial pressures related to the sluggish economy are likely leading more poor women to terminate pregnancies. The institute found that the number of abortion recipients who were poor jumped from 27 percent in 2000 to 42 percent in 2008, the first full year of the economic downturn.

Media outlets tend to ignore these findings and the financial pressures driving them, and simply report on abortion rates and laws without factoring in race and class. Including more women of color and their advocates in mainstream media stories would produce more comprehensive articles.

For instance, Boonstra says a primary reason that poor women have high rates of unintended pregnancies is because they lack access to long-acting forms of contraception, a privilege afforded women with higher incomes and private insurance.

Dependence exclusively on birth control methods that must be used daily or for every sexual encounter, such as pills and condoms, leads to a higher unplanned pregnancy rate among disadvantaged women. Yet pundits and reporters typically don’t mention the impact that current legislation to curb access to birth control, abortion and sex education will have on underprivileged women.

I think that more African-American women need a turn at the mic to talk about how these issues are impacting the community,” says Janette Robinson-Flint, executive director of Black Women for Wellness, a Los Angeles organization that advocates for health needs of black women. “Major media outlets have a tendency not to have African-American women in anchor or decision-making positions.”

In 2010, the media extensively covered a suggestion by conservative groups, such as the Issues4Life Foundation, that abortion providers were influencing black women to terminate their pregnancies. In major cities, right-wing groups have erected billboards on which they contend that the high number of abortions black women have is tantamount to genocide.

A primary reason that poor women have high rates of unintended pregnancies is because they lack access to long-acting forms of contraception.”

Robinson-Flint says she was dismayed that the media focused on the controversial billboards without delving deeply into factors that lead black women to have abortions at five times the rate that white women do.

They didn’t talk about the social justice issues,” she says of the flawed reporting. “They didn’t talk about poverty, unemployment, infant mortality, maternal mortality, any of the contributing factors.” She adds that in Los Angeles, for example, hospital closures have resulted in too few medical providers to meet the black community’s needs, contributing to lack of family planning.

Some states have no providers who perform abortions, and legislation pending in Mississippi would result in closure of the sole facility there. Such laws pose the greatest disadvantage to poor, underprivileged women, according to Boonstra, because they already struggle to cover the basic cost of an abortion. Fifty-seven percent of women pay for the procedure out of pocket, the Guttmacher Institute reports.

The institute’s overview of state abortion laws as of May 1 is available here.

Removing local abortion providers means that poor women also must pay for travel to a state that provides abortions and likely miss work or pay for child care if they are among the 61 percent of women who have abortions and are mothers. These costs may increase if women seek abortions in states that require them to endure a waiting period before terminating their pregnancies. Women in this predicament will likely have to miss more days of work and pay for extended stays in hotels, Boonstra says.

The abortion debate isn’t the only sexual health issue making headlines. Legislation to limit the type of sexual education taught in schools has also received major mainstream media coverage. Often omitted from this coverage is that youths of color deprived of sexual education classes may be especially vulnerable.

Right-wing groups have erected billboards on which they contend that the high number of abortions black women have is tantamount to genocide.”

Black teens, for example, are twice as likely as whites or Latinos to develop a sexually transmitted infection, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported in 2008. That figure was consistent even when factoring in income levels and numbers of sexual partners, an indication that these teens are not taught how to practice safer sex.

After a decline in teen pregnancy from 1990 to 2005, the rates rose in 2006 for all racial groups, particularly minorities. The Hispanic teen pregnancy rate rose by 126.6 percent that year, followed by blacks at 126.3 percent and whites at 44 percent.

There’s plenty of research that shows abstinence-oriented sex education leads to more teen pregnancy and not less,” says Dominique DiPrima, host of Front Page, a Los Angeles radio show. DiPrima focuses largely on issues of concern to communities of color and women. She recently launched the Black Media Alliance, a coalition of African-Americans in media and broadcasting, to encourage the mainstream media to represent people of color more often as reporters, sources and decision makers.

There needs to be more [discussion] in the media where women are talking with women and not in a defensive posture,” DiPrima says. “A lot of times, you see panels where there are no women. Not to say men should be excluded, but there [need] to be more places where women can have frank dialogue.”

DiPrima says the media rely too often on professional pundits rather than people of color, who are most likely to be affected.

The Black Media Alliance has had discussions with media outlets such as Clear Channel about racism and misogyny on air. DiPrima says she hopes that communities of color learn more about attacks on reproductive rights before pending legislation becomes law and it’s too late to act.

I believe people are waking up and realizing that Republicans have gone so Neanderthal with their attacks on women,” she says. “They’re uniting women. I think it’s going to wake people up, and the end result may just be the opposite of what they’re planning for the country.”

Nadra Kareem Nittle writes media critiques for the Robert C. Maynard Institute for Journalism Education. Her stories and other media critiques are available at HYPERLINK "http://www.mije.org/mmcsi" www.mije.org/mmcsi and can be republished free of charge. For more information, please contact Elisabeth Pinio at epinio@mije.org or 510-891-9202.

Share this

1 comment

Is PPFA & Guttmacher the Goods Guys vs the Repug Bad Guys?

Submitted by Nixakliel on Fri, 06/01/2012 - 00:38.

Should PPFA & the Guttmacher Institute be seen as the 'good-guys' [RE: Black & Brown Women] vis-a-vis the Romney/Repug bad-guys? [Definitely the Repugs generally are NO friends of Black & Brown People- thus there's no real need to even discuss them.]... Or is this an overly-simplified [& even inaccurate] 'main-stream' 'liberal' vs conservative view-point?

A few facts concerning PPFA & the Guttmacher Institute: FYI: The Guttmacher Institute is closely associated w PPFA- in effect PPFA’s ‘research & data-collection’ arm. Alan Guttmacher was PPFA’s Pres from 1962 -1974.

According to PPFA’s own website PPFA financially invested in the development of the Birth-control pill [first developed by Searle Pharmaceuticals which was once headed by one Donald Rumsfeld], & the notoriously troublesome IUD implants. So presumably they may still have a strong financial incentive [ala partial patent rights] to push the Pill & IUDs.

It’s a standard PPFA / Guttmacher rhetorical talking-point [preached as gospel] that the best way to prevent unwanted pregnancies is using artificial [IE: Big PHARMA Based] birth-control methods. But what do the stats actually say?

From InfoPlease: @ www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0904509.html

Abortion in the United States:

About 1 in 5 abortions are performed on teenage girls.

54% of women having abortions were using a contraceptive method around the same time they got pregnant

As opposed to- 8% of women having abortions have never used a method of birth control - [Thus nearly 7Xs as many women getting abortions were using birth-control at the time they got pregnant as those who never used birth-control].

Nine in ten women at risk of unintended pregnancy are using a contraceptive method.

Other facts that can be derived from Guttmacher’s own data: Over 50%+ of Black & 30%+ of Hispanic pregnancies are terminating in abortion as opposed to about 9%+ of white pregnancies ending in abortion.

Another stat that PPFA & Guttmacher does NOT push is: 75% of PPFA clinics are in / near Black & Brown neighborhoods even though both Blacks & Hispanics together comprise less than 30% of the US population. 

Surely Black & Brown Women need pre-natal & post-natal care services & even adoption services as much, if not more so than, abortion services / referrals & access to artificial [IE: pharmecuetically based] birth-control- YET PPFA is NOT in BIZ for pre & post- natal care & adoption services.

_________________________________________________________

 

The Black Feminist Author Sis Dorothy Roberts has written a book entitled 'Killing the Black Body: Race, Reproduction, and the Meaning of Liberty' which looks at these issues from a progressive Black Woman's perspective, beyond the standard mainstream [IE: white] 'liberal' vs conservative perspective. A brief outline of her book:

} A no-holds-barred response to the liberal and conservative retreat from an assertive, activist, and socially transformative civil rights agenda of recent years--using a Black feminist lens and the issue of the impact of recent legislation, social policy, and welfare "reform" [= DeForm] on Black women's--especially poor Black women's--control over their bodies' autonomy and their freedom to bear and raise children with respect and dignity in a society whose white mainstream is determined to demonize, even criminalize their lives... -  By using the history of how American law--beginning with slavery--IE  white slave-masters 'right' to force slave women to produce children to work for them [& often fathered by them ala Thomas Jefferson via Sally Hemmings], till the current government "solutions" to African American child-bearing like the distribution of the long-term contraceptive Norplant in African American communities. Sis Roberts effectively makes the case for the legal redress to the racist implications of current policy with regards to 1) access to and coercive Gov't dispensing of birth control to poor Black women [IE: modern day horrors of Norplant, Deproprevera, etc- all developed & marketed by Big PHARMA & the Rockfellers' 'Population-Council'- for $BIG$- w ringing endorsements from PPFA, Guttmacher, The Feminist Majority, etc] 2) the criminalization of parenting by poor Black women 3) the stigmatization and devaluation of poor Black mothers under the new welfare provisions [courtesy of Slick Willie in bi-partisanship w Newt Grinch-witch]... - Sis Roberts critiques the predominately white pro-choice movement for preoccupation with white middle class women and presuming that reproductive access means the same thing for all groups. Sis Roberts holds that Black women's fertility seems to be valued only if white society can find ways to benefit from it. Sis Roberts asserts abortion should NOT be the sole issue of a truly progressive reproductive rights movement because coercive sterilization and contraceptive programs are also painful incidents in Black women's reproductive history. And she asserts that the 'main-stream' pro-choice movement should have [but failed to] opposed recent 'welfare reform victories' [sponsored by Slick Willie {who was strongly endorsed by most main-stream feminist orgs} in combo w Grinch-witch] because of the destruction such punitative measures have on Black communities. Although most recipients were & still are white, policy debates were/are flooded with images of Black "welfare queens" to foster and exacerbate racial and class tensions...  {

___________________________________________________________

Food For Thought: It's just been announced that, probably for the first time in US history, white births are in the minority vis-a-vis non-white births. So expect the usually suspects to push their population-control [Uhm thats birth-control & abortion] agenda RE: Black & Brown women w even greater intensity.

Drupal theme by Kiwi Themes.