Freedom Rider: Food Stamp Corporate Welfare

Submitted by Margaret Kimberley on Wed, 10/16/2013 - 00:48
Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

by BAR editor and senior columnist Margaret Kimberley

If you think the SNAP food stamps debate is about poor people’s need to eat, you’re wrong. It’s about big corporations’ need to profit. “Xerox, JPMorgan Chase and eFunds Corporation have all successfully turned poverty into a profit center.” So have Coca Cola, Kroger, Wal-Mart, Kelloggs and a large slice of the rest of the Fortune 500 corporations.

Freedom Rider: Food Stamp Corporate Welfare

by BAR editor and senior columnist Margaret Kimberley

Discussions about government spending are inherently bogus because the elephant in the room, big business, is absent.”

The federal and state governments operate under a system which is of the corporations, by the corporations, and for the corporations. Ordinary governmental functions which could easily be carried out with public money are instead privatized, depriving the public sector of revenue and jobs and making the neediest citizens unnecessarily dependent on the private sector. Governmental largesse on behalf of big business is focused primarily on poor people, the group most at the mercy of the system. Corporations collect child support payments and then imprison the poor people who can’t pay. While imprisoned, another corporation provides what passes for medical care. The crime is a perfect one.

When the Republicans demanded cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), better known as food stamps, the debate revolved around human need versus the call for fiscal austerity. Scarcely anyone mentioned that JPMorgan Chase, Xerox and eFunds Corporation make millions of dollars off of this system meant to help the poor.

It all came to light on October 12th, when many SNAP recipients in the states of Alabama, California, Georgia, Iowa, Illinois, Louisiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Maryland, Mississippi, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Texas and Virginia were unable to make purchases with their Electronic Benefits Transfer (EBT) cards because of a computer system malfunction at Xerox.

It may at first have seemed odd for a Fortune 500 corporation to have anything to do with the SNAP program, but Xerox, JPMorgan Chase and eFunds Corporation have all successfully turned poverty into a profit center. Food stamps were once literally stamps until the 1996 welfare reform act required all state SNAP benefits to be digitized. At that point JPMorgan, Xerox and eFunds were quite literally in the money. Only the state of Montana administers its own SNAP program. Every other state pays one of these three corporations millions of dollars in fees to do what they could do themselves. Since 2007, Florida has paid JP Morgan $90 million, Pennsylvania’s seven-year contract totaled $112 million and New York’s seven-year contract totaled $126 million.

Every policy decision in state capitols and Washington DC is made with the needs of big business in mind.”

Food stamps are not the only government program that is administered by private corporations. WIC payments and child support collections are also moneymakers for Xerox and the rest of the financial services industry.

Like so many other debates in America, discussions about government spending are inherently bogus because the elephant in the room, big business, is absent. Millions of Americans are angry because food stamp recipients can use their benefits to buy junk food but don’t realize that they are able to do so because corporate America wouldn’t have it any other way.

Coca Cola, Kroger, Walmart, Kelloggs and other corporations have all lobbied the United States Department of Agriculture and congress to prevent any measures being put in place that would restrict SNAP use to healthy food choices. It isn’t difficult to understand why this is the case. They want to make as much money as possible and won’t abide anything that impedes their ability to keep turning huge profits. In just one year, nine Walmart Supercenters in Massachusetts received more than $33 million in SNAP revenues, which is more than four times the amount of SNAP benefits received at all farmers’ markets nationwide.

The recent congressional fracas about food stamp expenditures was like the shutdown debate, all for show. The Republican right wing advocates the most extreme anti-government positions in order to satisfy their base. Democrats rightly complain about cruelty to the poor but while the drama goes on the real welfare cheats keep cashing in, unlikely to be disadvantaged by either side after the dust settles.

If Americans knew that tasks easily carried out by their states were contracted out to big business, they would be very angry. That explains why no one tells them the truth. Governors, state legislators, and members of Congress are unlikely to expose their own timidity and corruption and the corporate media do as little reporting on serious issues as they can possibly get away with.

It is no exaggeration to say that every policy decision in state capitols and Washington DC is made with the needs of big business in mind. Wars against drugs and dead beat dads may resonate with the public, but the end result always includes a means of increasing corporate profits.

No matter what happens after the shut down kabuki theater ends, Walmart will not lose one penny of its food stamp revenues. No one on Capitol Hill will mess with the 1%. The business of America is still business.

Margaret Kimberley's Freedom Rider column appears weekly in BAR, and is widely reprinted elsewhere. She maintains a frequently updated blog as well as at http://freedomrider.blogspot.com. Ms. Kimberley lives in New York City, and can be reached via e-Mail at Margaret.Kimberley(at)BlackAgendaReport.com.

Share this

3 comments

US Corporatocracy Subsidized Gov't SNAP & Welfare Progs

Submitted by Nixakliel on Fri, 10/18/2013 - 04:49.

First: It's amazing that so many working class whites let racist tendencies cloud their judgment to the point that they have time & again gone against their own best interests- cause they think that Blacks & Browns benefit too much Gov't welfare & affirmative action. [IMO: This enduring fact is the main flaw in communist meme that the real issues RE inequality & oppression in the US {& many other places} has far more to do w class rather than race, as if these 2 are NOT generally thoroughly intertwined in the US- thus Blacks {& Browns} should join w ALL {'working-class'} whites in a so-called 'World Socialist Revolution'.] 

During Slick Willy's welfare deform debate, he let the cat out of the bag- Yet seemingly not enough working class whites were really listening- Which Is: 1} Those who benefit most from Gov't welfare in absolute numbers are poor &/or working class white women -2} Those who have benefited most from affirmative action progs have again been white women.    

IMO These 2 facts are likely the main reason why the Gov't has totally done-away w welfare & affirmative action progs. 

 

The Real News recently did a piece titled 'Over Half of Workers in the Fast Food Industry Rely on Welfare'. The report went on to say that because the multi $BILLION$ fast food industry pays their aver workers so poorly that tax-payers are effectively subsidizing this multi $BILLION$ industry to the tune of $7 BiLLION$ per yr! Further it's also been reported that many /most Walmart workers [mainly women] have to rely on food-stamps to supplement their income, cause Wal-Mart pays most of its workers poverty-wages, & keeps them on PT status indefinitely, so Wal-Mart won't have pay for FT benefits. Thus BIG multi $BILLION$ BIZ Corps IE: Wal-Mart, McDonald & Burger King, KFC, Chuck E Cheeze, Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, etc... are effectively subsidized by Gov't welfare, because they refuse to pay their aver workers a real living wage, even though they can readily afford to, just so their CEOs & CFOs & their ilk can get paid big fat outrageous salaries & 'perks'. In fact these huge corps often have seminars for their workers on how to apply for food-stamps & welfare- IE: it's actually ['officially'] part of their so-called 'business model'!

This is why the debate over whether the minimum wage should be $10/hr - $12/hr - $15/hr without talking about a maximum wage [for Corp CEOs & CFOs, etc] pegged to the minimum wage at between 25Xs to not more than 50Xs that of the min wage [IE: CEOs' total salary & perks can be NO more than 50Xs that of their corps' lowest paid workers &/or 50Xs that of the official min-wage]- especially with unions going almost extinct, is at best a temporary stop-gap measure.  

  

 

Drupal theme by Kiwi Themes.