Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.  If you broadcast our audio commentaries please consider a recurring donation to Black Agenda Report.

Fletcherism and Fakery: Guarding Obama’s Left Flank

  • Sharebar
    Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version


    by BAR executive editor Glen Ford

    Obama’s key apologists on the Left have released their 2012 position paper, in which “the facts of the Obama presidency – his actual behavior on war, austerity, and civil liberties – are deemed irrelevant.” We need four more years of Obama, they say, to open up “space” for progressive action. In reality, Obama’s “great legacy has been to create vast political space for Wall Street and the Pentagon.”


    Fletcherism and Fakery: Guarding Obama’s Left Flank

    by BAR executive editor Glen Ford

    Fletcher and Davidson want Blacks and progressives to respond with hysteria to GOP ‘irrationalism,’ keeping the traditional Democratic base in the Obama camp through raw fear.”

    Bill Fletcher and Carl Davidson are two Left opportunists with a problem. Unlike four years ago, when Fletcher co-founded Progressives for Obama, their guy now has a record – and it is indefensible. Solution: nullify the issues right up front in the title to their reworked rationale for backing the Bill of Rights-destroying, Wall Street-protecting, Africa-bombing, regime-changing corporate Democrat. Their August 9 article, “The 2012 Elections Have Little To Do With Obama's Record … Which Is Why We Are Voting For Him” frames the campaign as a contest between “revenge-seeking” white supremacists and – well…those of us who are not revenge-seeking white supremacists. The facts of the Obama presidency – his actual behavior on war, austerity, and civil liberties – are deemed irrelevant, and the president himself becomes a mere stage prop in the battle against “Caligula,” the Republicans.

    Fletcher and Davidson want Blacks and progressives to respond with hysteria to GOP “irrationalism,” to keep the traditional Democratic base in the Obama camp through raw fear. They claim the current campaign “will be unlike anything that any of us can remember.” In truth, the abject Black failure to make a single demand of Obama, and the vapid excuses and rationalizations for the Left’s political collapse in his presence, then and now, makes 2012 very much resemble 2008. Back then, Fletcher & Co. wrote:

    Barack Obama's very biography reflects the positive potential of the globalization process that also contains such grave threats to our democracy when shaped only by the narrow interests of private corporations in an unregulated global marketplace. We should instead be globalizing the values of equality, a living wage and environmental sustainability in the new world order, not hoping our deepest concerns will be protected by trickle-down economics or charitable billionaires. By its very existence, the Obama campaign will stimulate a vision of globalization from below.”

    Four years later, we are admonished to forget the facts as they actually transpired – and as we at BAR predicted – and pretend the current campaign is a crusade against the Tea Party, with Obama as the incidental beneficiary.

    2012 very much resembles 2008.”

    Right-wing populism is the bogey man, in opposition to which we must re-embrace Obama. The GOP isn’t just racist, it is “irrational,” crying for “a return to the past.” They write:

    Obama represents an irrational symbol for the political right, and a potent symbol that goes way beyond what Obama actually stands for and practices. The right, while taking aim at Obama, also seeks, quite methodically and rationally, to use him to turn back the clock.”

    Of course, the meaning of the term reactionary is to “turn back the clock,” a promise Republicans have been making for 50 years. And racism is fundamentally irrational, causing white supremacists to see that which is not there, be blinded to facts that are right in front of their noses, and to invent whole narratives of history. But, this time is different, Fletcher and Davison insist, because the Right is so intensely focused on the symbolism of Obama, the Black man – and so “irrational” about it that they make up ridiculous things about him, like his non-citizenhood.

    Therefore, our response, as progressives, must be to forge a “common front based on resisting white revanchism… on political misogynism, on anti-‘freeloader’ themes aimed at youth, people of color and immigrants, and a partial defense of the so-called 1%.” The fact that Obama is demonstrably not a part of that common front must not dissuade us from joining his campaign. If the Right has made Obama its symbolic focus, we must, in response, make him the focus of our “common front.” If the Right hates Obama with an irrational passion, we must hug him to our breasts.

    Just in case the logic of such reasoning escapes you, Fletcher and Davidson remind us that the Republicans are not merely irrational – they are crazy like Caligula.

    November 2012 becomes not a statement about the Obama presidency, but a defensive move by progressive forces to hold back the ‘Caligulas’ on the political right. It is about creating space and using mass campaigning to build new grassroots organization of our own. It is not about endorsing the Obama presidency or defending the official Democratic platform. But it is about resisting white revanchism and political misogynism by defeating Republicans and pressing Democrats with a grassroots insurgency, while advancing a platform of our own, one based on the ‘People’s Budget’ and antiwar measures of the Congressional Progressive Caucus. In short, we need to do a little ‘triangulating’ of our own.”

    Only charlatans preach that progressive movements must install preferred personalities from the menus of the ruling circles before they can find space to move.”

    So, it’s not about “endorsing the Obama presidency” – but about voting for Obama while claiming that the facts of what he did as president don’t matter. It is about the nonsense of “creating space” so that the Left can do what it ought to do anyway, but which it didn’t do in the two years leading up to the 2008 election, or in the first two and a half years of the Obama presidency, until the Occupy Wall Street activists came out of left field in disgust with both parties’ subservience to finance capital. The anti-war movement seems largely to oppose only Republican wars.

    The great fallacy, here, is that Democratic presidents in general, and Obama in particular, somehow create “space” for progressive activism. Movements create space for themselves, by acting. Only charlatans preach that progressive movements must install preferred personalities from the menus of the ruling circles before they can find space to move.

    The great tragedy of the Obama era, is that his presence has had the effect of shutting down progressive – and, most dramatically, Black – opposition to the prevailing order. This does not happen by the magic of charisma. Political operatives identified with the Left work diligently to maintain such silence – people like Fletcher and Davidson, who are once again guarding the left flank for Obama, whose great legacy has been to create vast political space for Wall Street and the Pentagon, with a minimum of resistance from white progressives, Blacks and the rest of the Democratic base.

    That’s why we at BAR call Obama the more effective evil.

    BAR executive editor Glen Ford can be contacted at

    Share this

    On civil liberties - looking for Hansu agreement

    I was looking for the Hansu agreement on line just now and came upon a link to the ACLU  (The Hansu agreement was court settlement over NYPD illegal spying in 1970s, and ignored by NYPD, which got "caught" in law suits resulting from NYPD "preventive detention" during 2004 Republican National Convention.  NYPD had a "red desk" and "black desk" way back when - to which they've added Islamophobia-driven whole super section, which found nothing- no surprise.  On our "dime".)

       Howard Zinn said in a speech given shortly after the 2008 presidential election, "If you don't know history, it's like you were born yesterday and the government can tell you anything.".  I was surprised to hear, after his death, that the FBI had a file on Zinn going back to his days in the U.S. military during WWII.  He's enlisted at 18 and was a bombadier.  His antiwar views are an evolution - I often recommend my favorite book You Can't Be Neutral on a Moving Train, Zinn's autobio, Boston:Beacon Press, 2003 or so; there are two editions.  The newer edition's introduction is a short handbook to social change.  Howard Zinn, although optimistic until his death, was so often correct.  He supported the Move family in their fight against injustice done to them.


    I learned a lot from Howard Zinn's written works, and from his speeches and interviews. His optimism was off-putting at times, but I never held it against him. I think that as a skeptical, thinking, Black person who lives in society that is fundamentally anti-Black, optimism, especially when it comes from people who are not Black, and have not shared our American experience, often seems contrived, an easy out, a way to absolve (White) America for its evils. I've grown to understand that there are different kinds of optimism, and that it is possible to be deeply skeptical of the system and the society which imposes it, while still believing that victory is possible. 

    Am pleased you learned from Howard Zinn;me,too

    Howard Zinn called me "friend", a regular person, artist, who once wrote him,in the early 1990s, that he'd left "disabled people" out of his list of groups that learned from the Black Civil Rights Movement.  He answered and we had correspondence until his death.  He was kind, as was his wife, Roslyn, also an artist.  They are both missed.  I do marvel, still, at this optimism.  He used to say that even in terrible times, there are good people...

    He also was an activist.  His autobio is wonderful - from his Brooklyn beginnings, enlisting in the military during WWII when he turned 18, how he got "involved"... It's not a long book.  The documentary with same title, "You Can't Be Neutral on a Moving Train" is a bit different, but is free and on YouTube.  His 90th birthday would have been on Fri. Aug.24.  There is a website:

    (Note: I first heard of Howard Zinn when Bernard White and the "Emanations" Collective radio show on WBAI were reading the entire "People's History of the United States" by Zinn, week after week.  Then I heard the speech that caused me to write him c/o his publisher.... WBAI now is not the WBAI of "then"...I support

    Sick S-it

    Back before the marketing scam known as the "2008 election," Davidson (who's looking more like Joseph Stalin every day) was cruising around the left blogosphere promising to organize protests on the White House lawn if Obama proved to be as bad as we McKinney voters feared he'd be.  Where are those protests, Davidson?

    I wouldn't take your advice if I was on fire and you had a fire truck.