Skip to Content

A Long-ago State of the Union Address: Lincoln Proposes to Ship Blacks Out of Country

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

by Glen Ford

lincoln and colored infantry

 

At the beginning of the American Civil War, Abraham Lincoln wasn't contemplating an Emancipation Proclamation, but wholesale deportation of Blacks - slave and newly freed alike. Problem was, Lincoln wasn't sure where to send the human cargo. A look at Lincoln's 1861 State of the Union Address.

A Long-ago State of the Union Address: Lincoln Proposes to Ship Blacks Out of Country

by BAR Staff

"It might be well to consider, too, whether the free colored people already in the United States could not...be included in such colonization."

Knowing that we would go to press before George Bush began his annual fulminations and lies to the American people, both Houses of Congress, and the assembled Supreme Court, we thought it timely to flash back to another State of the Union Address, 195 years ago.

On December 3, 1861, the Union was falling apart on Abraham Lincoln's watch. The eleven states of the Confederacy were so far winning the war that had begun earlier that year, and Lincoln's greatest fear was that other slave states - Delaware, Kentucky, Maryland, and Missouri - might yet secede.

The president felt he must tread lightly on the sensibilities and pocketbooks of the slave states that remained in the Union. Under no circumstances must the war be framed as a struggle to emancipate the Blacks. But there was a problem. Congress had declared that those persons in rebellion against the United States had forfeited their claims to "the labor and service of certain other persons" - their slaves. More compelling, many tens of thousands of slaves had already liberated themselves, finding refuge in Union armies where they were listed as "contraband." By law, these persons could not be returned to their rebellious masters and, in Lincoln's words, "are already dependent on the United States and must be provided for in some way." The ranks of de facto free men and women were swelling - a quandary for Mr. Lincoln.

In his State of the Union address, Lincoln announced his solution to the excess no-longer-slaves problem:

"...I recommend that Congress provide for accepting such persons from such    States, according to some mode of valuation, in lieu, pro tanto, of direct taxes, or upon some other plan to be agreed on with such States respectively; that such persons, on such acceptance by the General Government, be at once deemed free, and that in any event steps be taken for colonizing both classes ["contraband" and slaves newly freed by States of the Union] at some place or places in a climate congenial to them. It might be well to consider, too, whether the free colored people already in the United States could not, so far as individuals may desire, be included in such colonization."

Get rid of them - somehow, somewhere. Which raised another problem: the United States had no colonies to which to transport the freedmen. What's a president to do, with so many ex-slaves underfoot, cluttering up the war? Lincoln had a plan:

"To carry out the plan of colonization may involve the acquiring of territory, and also the appropriation of money beyond that to be expended in the territorial acquisition. Having practiced the acquisition of territory for nearly sixty years, the question of constitutional power to do so is no longer an open one with us. The power was questioned at first by [President] Jefferson, who, however, in the purchase of Louisiana, yielded his scruples on the plea of great expediency. If it be said that the only legitimate object of acquiring territory is to furnish homes for white men, this measure effects that object, for the emigration of colored men leaves additional room for white men remaining or coming here. Mr. Jefferson, however, placed the importance of procuring Louisiana more on political and commercial grounds than on providing room for population.

"On this whole proposition, including the appropriation of money with the acquisition of territory, does not the expediency amount to absolute necessity - that without which the Government itself can not be perpetuated?"

Fewer Blacks, more room for white men. At the time, Lincoln appears to have found a certain elegance in the equation. But the destination for this human exodus was still lacking. For more than half a century, the United States had refused to recognize the Republic of Haiti, founded by rebel slaves. The U.S. also had no diplomatic relations with Liberia, founded by free American Blacks through the American Colonization Society, a group close to Lincoln's pre-war racial outlook, partially funded by slave owners intent on cleansing the nation of free Blacks. However, when Liberia declared itself a republic in 1847, the slave South prevented U.S. recognition of Liberian independence. Free Blacks flying their own flag - even an ocean away - was anathema.

"The emigration of colored men leaves additional room for white men remaining or coming here."

Either Lincoln would have to invade some other country (a tropical one, with a "climate congenial to" the freedmen) as a repository for the unwelcome Blacks, or he could negotiate with the two existing Black republics to accept flotillas of new immigrants. Lincoln proposed the latter:

"If any good reason exists why we should persevere longer in withholding our recognition of the independence and sovereignty of Hayti and Liberia, I am unable to discern it. Unwilling, however, to inaugurate a novel policy in regard to them without the approbation of Congress, I submit for your consideration the expediency of an appropriation for maintaining a charge' d'affaires near each of those new States. It does not admit of doubt that important commercial advantages might be secured by favorable treaties with them."

Such was Lincoln's thinking in December, 1861. But expediency - that quality so admired by Lincoln - won out. It became expedient to issue the Emancipation Proclamation, January 1, 1863, to deprive the slave states of captive labor. It was expedient to enlist "colored" troops to thicken the Union ranks, as whites in New York and scores of other Union cities rioted against conscription in a war to "free the nigger." By war's end, one out of five Union soldiers was Black, and only fools spoke of "colonization."

What a difference a war makes.

Share this

Comments

Lincoln Hated Blacks, here is more proof!!!!!!

The white man is quick to say that The U.S is a “Christian Nation” with a “Judeo/Christian values system”.

WHAT THE HELL!!!!!!!!!

Lets take a stroll down memory lane!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Before the “American revolution” the African had been fighting for his own freedom and justice from white devils in the western hemisphere.

White people had tricked Blacks into helping them fight against their “British oppressors” and were promised “freedom” if victory was achieved.

The Americans won and Blacks continued on as slaves for nearly another century with much harsher treatment.

Satanist president Lincoln asked the slaves to help fight his white wicked confederate brothers and once again the Blackman helped their evil slave masters defeat their own brethren.

After the sinister and pagan “victory” of the “Union” over the “Confederates” the now “Christianized”, illiterate, docile, poverty stricken, ex-slave was now given a new Anglo-Saxon (and jewish?) form of satanic apartheid called “JIM CROW” which lasted nearly another century!!!!!!!

Here’s a quote from that wretched MUTHA F#%@! LINCOLN and what he thought from his heart and soul on the position of the Africans in America:

“I will say, then, that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way, the social and political equality of the White and Black races; that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will forever forbid the two races living together on the terms of social and political equality, and inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”
Ruchames, L., Racial Thought in America, the university of Massachussets Press boston, 1969, Vol 1, pp. 380-80.

And just think the vast majority of “Christian” negroes think that Prez Lincoln out of the benevolence of his heart “freed the slaves” F*(^$@! LINCOLN and may he rot in the hottest part of HELL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Dr. Radut | blog