Skip to Content

First Black Labor Union Marks Milestone And The Redbaiting Of Leftists

Printer-friendly versionPrinter-friendly version

by Jean Damu


Lots of the “heroes” of Black history made their own deals with the devil. A. Philip Randolph, famed Black union organizer and credited with proposing the 1963 March on Washington, collaborated in vicious red-baiting of Black radicals. Philips and his aide, Bayard Rustin, fought the good fight for civil rights and jobs, but “beyond the borders and shores of America Phillips and Randolph were virulent defenders of colonialism and capitalism.”



First Black Labor Union Marks Milestone And The Redbaiting Of Leftists


by Jean Damu


Randolph and Rustin kept the "Brotherhood" securely within the confines of the old AFL, the bedrock pillar of white supremacy within the US labor movement.”


I salute all the tributes and accolades conferred upon our first mostly Black union (Phillipinos were also members, as well as women-so, so much for "brotherhood.") However, as a former member of the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters who worked in the Colorado Division of the Santa Fe Railroad out of Albuquerque, New Mexico, I have to admit it gets a little tiresome reading constant and continual incorrect references to the Pullman Porters Union and never any holistic political assessment to the political stances of A. Philip Randolph and the acolyte who sat at his right hand, Bayard Rustin.


George Pullman, the founder of the Pullman Car Co. was a racist who sent his agents throughout the postbellum South hiring formerly enslaved Blacks to work on his Pullman cars. Ingeniously he made a specialty of hiring the darkest skinned Blacks available. He wanted the class distinctions to be as stark as possible and thought the darkest Blacks would be the most grateful for the job and cause the fewest labor problems. His thinking proved accurate for a time.


Then he leased the cars along with the brainwashed Black workers, whom he encouraged to kowtow to the white customers, to the various railroad companies as complete packages. But there were other Black workers throughout the trains and these workers completed the membership of the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters.


Additionally, and almost completely ignored by history is the role of Ishmael Flory, a University of California, Berkeley graduate who almost single handedly and working out of Oakland organized the cooks on the railroads. Later his union moved him to Chicago where for the remainder of his life he led radical causes.


George Pullman thought the darkest Blacks would be the most grateful for the job and cause the fewest labor problems.”


I particularly mention Ishmael Flory because his skills and politics as an organizer were at least equal to those of Rustin, but because Flory never accepted right wing social democracy, historians have diminished his role and pumped up the legacy of Randolph and Rustin.


What am I talking about here?


When it came to domestic politics Randolph and Rustin were on the mark most of the time, fighting for equal rights, civil rights and most of all jobs – but they only conducted these struggles within the parameters of being perceived as good Americans. Beyond the borders and shores of America Phillips and Randolph were virulent defenders of colonialism and capitalism. That is why Randolph and Rustin kept the "Brotherhood" securely within the confines of the old AFL, the bedrock pillar of white supremacy within the US labor movement. Someone once asked C.L Dellums, an executive of the Brotherhood, "Why does the old man [Randolph] keep us in the AFL. Why don't we join [the more progressive] CIO?" "I wish I knew," Dellums said.


Well, today the answer is quite obvious. The CIO admitted communists to their ranks and encouraged leftism. Despite being former radicals themselves Randolph and Rustin had the fear of God injected into them when they realized the government might attempt to put them in prison or worse foreclose, especially in Randolph's case, on their comfortable lifestyle. Predictably they became devout right wing social democrats willing, no eager, to throw people like Ish Flory, William Patterson, Paul Robeson, W.E.B.DuBois and all their other former comrades under the bus of "good Americanism." (As long as I'm in the mood to trash revered Black icons this morning let me add that it was just these kinds of anti-leftist sentiments that convinced Thurgood Marshall he should become an informant for the FBI, that it was his duty to let the Feds know what the Reds were up to.)


At no point did Randolph or Rustin ever denounce the war in Viet Nam. In the mid 1970's I was at a breakfast of labor leaders at the old Jack Tar Hotel in San Francisco. Even though I was just a worker at the hotel I hung around to hear what keynote speaker Rustin had to say. The salient points of his talk that morning were a spirited defense of Israel and a pooh- poohing of the liberation movements in Africa and especially of the, in his mind, quixotic notion of freedom in South Africa. Oh, apartheid should end, but any possibility of it happening in our lifetime, forget it, he told his appreciative audience.


The salient points of his talk that morning were a spirited defense of Israel and a pooh- poohing of the liberation movements in Africa.”


Ishmael Flory, on the other hand, and other of his generational and political comrades (Claude Lightfoot, Roscoe Procter) were traveling the country, speaking at campuses telling Black students it was "their duty" to help fund and ARM the liberation movements. No wonder most have never heard of these long forgotten warriors. (Shamefully, many on the Left were disrespectful as well. When the 1973 6th Pan Africa conference was organized in Tanzania, mostly by African Americans, African American organizers conspired and did their damndest to prevent Ish and his young protégé, Tony Monteiro from attending or receiving credentials to the conference. The woman who headed the credential committee bragged about her role in the pages of the Black Scholar magazine not long ago. Pitiful, just pitiful.)


But despite the darkness surrounding the union leadership I have to say that pound for pound my job on the railroads and with the union was one of the best paying jobs I ever had. The union was forced to accept segregation where it existed. For instance if we worked from New Mexico to Dodge City, Kansas, the white workers on the crew spent the night in the Kit Carson Hotel the bill for which the company paid. No such luck for us Blacks. Our luck allowed us to enjoy the luxury of the basement of the train station, with its one electric light bulb. The Santa Fe allowed us to take sheets and blankets off the train for the old rusty bunks we slept on and got upset if we forgot to return them.


But let's not forget the Randolph, Rustin and the Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters did much to help create a Black middle class in the US and for that they are owed much credit. But I'm never one for sweeping the dark side under the rug.



Share this

Comments

Randolph urged blacks not to

Randolph urged blacks not to sign up for WWI. I think it's pretty shitty to assume that Randolph feared "the government might attempt to put them in prison or worse foreclose, especially in Randolph's case, on their comfortable lifestyle..."

At the Lincoln Memorial with MLK Randolph's speech was short - "... But this civil rights revolution is not confined to the Negro, nor is it confined to civil rights, for our white allies know that they cannot be free while we are not, and we know we have no future in a nation in which six million black and white people are unemployed and millions live in poverty .... We want a free democratic society dedicated to the political, economic and social advancement of man along moral lines... We know that real freedom will require many changes in the nation’s political and social philosophies and institutions." He was 80 at the time.

Sometimes it seems to me that today's younger blacks (well, younger than me, 60-ish) ... rather than build on the legacy of previous generations - seem to think everything should be the way you want it right now ... as if previous civil righters didn't work hard enough.

And looking around the 'hood today - I can't help but wonder if what we old gray heads worked for has been squandered.

How much criticism is fair?

With all due respect, I can't help but question how much criticism is warranted here. I agree that being "virulent defenders of colonialism and capitalism" makes Randolph and Rustin open to derision, but you do claim that you want a "holistic political assessment" of their political stances. Unless you guide me to some actual facts, positions they actually declared or implied (in their own words), I'm forced to accept conjecture based on your experience. I deeply value your experience, but this article assumes a lot. I want to understand what logic Randolph and Rustin may have been using. Instead, it seems, you rely on rhetoric that I am very familiar with (and largely support, so long as facts exist that I can analyze myself). Please, I need more information before I can get behind your assessment. Thanks.

Thank You for your Leadership,Service and Insight

It's always enlightening to hear history from those that were there to make it.

Leadership

I found your article interesting and hope you would write another one about Randolph and Rustin's roles both positive and negative in the movement

Leadership

I found your article interesting and hope you would write another one about Randolph and Rustin's roles both positive and negative in the movement



Clicky Web Analytics
blog | by Dr. Radut