This 9/11 in Manhattan: A Time to Confront the Racists

The more you learn about this not-Ground Zero non-Mosque hype the more you know its really about HYPE-ocracy. First it turns out that the WTC was built on an old slave grave site [& probably Native Americans too] - no one thought that was sacrilegious. Now it turns out that near ground-zero are at least 2 strip clubs featuring hot hoochie-coochie momas strutting their stuff. Not a word about this ‘affront’ to the ‘HOLY/Revered’ Ground Zero from hypers like Newt Grinch-witch, FOX-Noise, etc. Only when alleged Islamic 'terrorist' sympathizers of the mis-named ground-zero Mosque [its not at ground-zero, nor is it a mosque] wanted to build a culture center did the Hype-ocrits take full poly-trickal advantage. And the gall of guys like: FOX Noise hyping that Obama isn't a real American & a socialist - while FOX's owner is a native Aussie & married to a woman from Communist China; Newt Grinch-witch - the guy who helped hype-up Slick Willie & Monica - while he was carrying on a torrid adulterous affair at the same time; John ‘Bomb Bomb Bomb’ Cain who kicked his first wife [who was badly injured & in rehab at the time] to the curb after having an affair w his current wife who is 20 yrs younger & a multi-millionairess; Rude Fooliani [Giuliani]- married 3 times- the first ended w him cheating on his 1st wife w his 2nd wife & DITTO w the 2nd & 3rd wives; the so called conservative_family values Tea-Partiers selecting a candidate for NY governor who was OUTed for forwarding racist & pornographic [including Beastiality] emails; etc, etc, etc. With guys like this representing the 'Moral Majority' no wonder they can hype the NOT-Ground-Zero non-Mosque as being an affront to the ‘sanctity’ of ground-zero, but say nothing about Strip-Clubs nearby - some of them might be clients.   

Just who REALLY were the 9-11 hijackers?

The following story appeared on rt.com (Russia Today)

Nine years on, 9/11 jury is still out
11 September, 2010, 09:13

On the ninth anniversary of the worst terror attacks to strike the US mainland, many questions remain unanswered, not least of all concerning the true identities of the perpetrators.

Three days after the events of 9/11 came crashing into our living rooms, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) reported the identities of the hijackers of the four US commercial aircraft. This was certainly record time for cracking the biggest crime case of modern times. However, the FBI may have jumped the gun, so to speak, on rushing to identify the perpetrators so quickly. As things turned out, this would be no small oversight – and even a bit of an embarrassment – since several of the accused terrorists were quickly reported to be alive and well.

One of the alleged terrorists on 9/11 was identified as Waleed Al Shehri, who the FBI accused of helping to hijack and crash American Airlines flight 11 into the World Trade Center together with four other individuals.

There was just one problem, however: Waleed Al Shehri is alive and at the time of the 9/11 attacks was employed as a pilot for Saudi Arabian Airlines.

Moreover, Al Shehri is not the only individual who appears to have been a victim of identity theft on 9/11. Indeed, less than two weeks after 9/11, British media reported that “the identities of four of the 19 suspects accused of having carried out the attacks are now in doubt.”

“The men – all from Saudi Arabia – spoke of their shock at being mistakenly named by the FBI as suicide terrorists,” reported the Telegraph of London. “None of the four was in the United States on September 11 and all are alive in their home country.”

One of the men, Abdulaziz Al Omari, was employed at the time of the attacks as an engineer with Saudi Telecoms. He told Arab media about the shock he felt when he saw his name on the terrorist list.

"I couldn't believe it when the FBI put me on their list,” Al Omari told Arab media. “They gave my name and my date of birth, but I am not a suicide bomber. I am here. I am alive. I have no idea how to fly a plane. I had nothing to do with this."

The other exonerated “terrorists” were identified as Saeed Al-Ghamdi, who works as a pilot with Saudi Arabian Airlines; Salem Al-Hamzi, who is employed at a petrochemical complex; and Ahmed Al-Nami, an administrative supervisor with Saudi Arabian Airlines.

Of the 19 alleged terrorists, seven of the men have subsequently been confirmed as being alive, yet their names remain on the official list of hijackers. Meanwhile, none of the names of the suspected terrorists were ever found to have been included on the official (original) passenger manifests of the hijacked flights. No explanation has ever been given for this oversight. When media reports do provide names of the passengers, however, they fail to say if the manifest was obtained from the airlines or not.

To date, the only piece of tangible evidence that any one of the 19 accused hijackers were actually on board any of the four hijacked aircraft was discovered on a sidewalk near the site of the World Trade Center complex.

Following the attacks, a passport belonging to Satam al Suqam, one of the alleged hijackers, was miraculously discovered in the vicinity of Vesey Street, near the World Trade Center.

"It was a significant piece of evidence for us," said one investigator.

So now the obvious question: How did the flimsy passport of one of the suspected hijackers emerge practically unscathed from the World Trade Center inferno, which was powerful enough to melt steel, and turn up on a New York City sidewalk?

The Guardian, for one, was highly skeptical: "The idea that [al Suqam's] passport had escaped from that inferno unsinged [tests] the credulity of the staunchest supporter of the FBI's crackdown on terrorism."

A look at the perpetrators
So who were the hijackers? The official story is that 15 of the 19 individuals accused of pirating United Airlines 93, United Airlines 175, American Airlines Flight 11 and American Airlines Flight 77 were Saudi Arabian citizens, trained in Afghanistan and, of course, fanatical Muslims born and bred on the teachings of the Prophet Mohammed.

The problem, however, is that the main terrorists on 9/11, namely Muhammad Atta, the alleged ringleader, and Abdulaziz Alomari behaved in a way that would not be considered normal for two dedicated Muslims who are about to commit suicide against "the infidel."

“It is the afternoon of September the 10th,” says Moni Ovadia, an Italian actor who provides narration in the film Zero: An Investigation into 9/11. “The next day will be the most important day in the two men’s’ lives. A day on which they cannot make any mistakes. But what do they do? They go on a trip to Portland! They spend the night there and they attract attention to themselves with their noisy revelry. They also pay with credit cards in their names. They do everything they can to leave traces of their presence there.”

At 6 AM on the fateful morning of 9/11, the two men fly to Boston. The plane that they are supposed to hijack, American Airlines Flight 11, which eventually crashes into the North Tower of the WTC, is scheduled to depart just 30 minutes after their arrival. This is cutting things extremely close.

The one piece of evidence that attempts to prove that these two individuals were on board this flight comes courtesy of CCTV video footage, photos that were beamed around the world as definitive proof of their involvement. The only problem, however, is that the grainy video grabs show the alleged hijackers boarding at Portland, not in Boston as widely believed.

But perhaps the most baffling details to emerge about the 9/11 terrorists is their inability to operate even the smallest aircraft, to say nothing of large commercial aircraft. Every flight instructor who had ever trained any of the alleged hijackers had nothing but negative remarks for their abilities to fly a plane.

Hani Hanjour, for example, who has been identified as the pilot who flew Flight 77 into the Pentagon, was said to have had problems landing even a small Cessna 172. Newsday reported that, “Even though Hanjour showed a federal pilot’s license…chief flight instructor…refused to rent him a plane.”

So on the basis of such poor piloting skills, how can we believe that Hansour was able to perform a flight maneuver with a lumbering Boeing 757 into the Pentagon that even a highly maneuverable fighter jet would have had trouble performing?

According to an article in the Washington Post, "The unidentified pilot executed a pivot so tight that it reminded observers of a fighter jet maneuver."

Meanwhile, the flight instructor who worked with Muhammad Atta and Abdulaziz Alomari, the two who were responsible for piloting American Airlines Flight 11 into the North Tower, described them as “dumb and dumber” when it came to their flying skills.

The mystery of the mastermind
One of the most incriminating pieces of evidence that is said to link Al Qaeda to the terrorist attacks of 9/11 apparently comes straight from the mouth of the terror mastermind himself, Osama bin Laden.

Following the 9/11 attacks, US soldiers stumbled upon a videotape in an abandoned house in Afghanistan that had allegedly sheltered Al Qaeda militants. According to the American translation of what is said on the tape, Osama bin Laden claims responsibility for the 9/11 attacks.

Marina Montesano of the University of Genova, however, provides a strikingly different opinion in the film Zero.

“A German TV network gave an alternative translation,” Montesano says. “It is completely different from the one given by American investigators. They (Al Qaeda) are not, apparently, claiming a role in the September 11th attacks. They are simply talking about what happened on September 11th.”

Montesano goes on to say that other videos containing Osama bin Laden are also inaccurate in their translations.

“Many of the other videos of Osama bin Laden have…a person speaking, and an audio track that does not correspond, or that corresponds very little, to what his lips are actually saying,” she claims.

Meanwhile, Giulietto Chiesa, a former member of the European Parliament and the producer of the film Zero, provided an incredible account of how the image of Osama bin Laden was manipulated to great effect during a European security meeting.

“People often ask me,” says Chiesa: “‘How can you doubt the official version [of 9/11] when Osama bin Laden himself appeared several times on television to say, ‘I did it.’”

Chiesa explains in his film: “In the summer of 2005, the Commission of the European Parliament for Security and Defense, of which I am a member, was invited to a special screening created by the Washington Center for Strategic Studies. We were asked to watch a film that depicted what would happen in Europe if Brussels was hit by a nuclear bomb – 50,000 deaths and 100,000 injured.”

The image that next appeared on the huge screen clearly took Chiesa by surprise, as well as the other European officials in attendance.

“Suddenly, footage of Osama bin Laden claiming responsibility for a nuclear attack on NATO headquarters comes on screen," Chiesa recounted. "All members of the Parliament, myself included, were rendered speechless. American experts from the Center for Strategic Studies were on hand to explain the action on screen.

“Then a parliamentarian finally said, ‘Today, we were shown a convincing demonstration of how Osama bin Laden’s image can be completely manipulated.'”

The experience allowed Chiesa to consider the possibility that “all of the Osamas we have seen over the years may have never existed. Just as a nuclear attack on NATO headquarters in Brussels has never taken place.”

Finally, incredible as it may sound, even the FBI remains unconvinced about Osama bin Laden’s participation in the events surrounding 9/11. Although he is a wanted man for other heinous crimes, including the bombings of the United States’ Embassies in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Nairobi, Kenya, which killed over 200 people, bin Laden is not wanted in connection with the attacks of 9/11.

On June 5, 2006, the Muckraker Report contacted the FBI Headquarters and asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on the FBI's web page. Rex Tomb, the FBI's Chief of Investigative Publicity, is reported to have commented, "The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Osama bin Laden's Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11."

On the basis of that comment, some may be rightly wondering exactly why US and NATO forces are battling the Taliban in Afghanistan, which the US accused of “harboring terrorists” on the very same day that the events broke on 9/11, despite there being little or no evidence to connect Osama bin Laden to 9/11.

Perhaps once Osama bin Laden is finally captured, he can shed some light on these nagging inconsistencies, otherwise the international community may be theorizing about 9/11 for a long time to come.

Well, I will say that I am so happy that I am not anywhere near Manhattan. This is a sacred day to many, the anniversary of the most frightening day of America and all these battle yet continue to rage.

 

When the casino online offers a great casino start-up bonus gambles should take advantage of the casino cash immediately.

The question isn't whether Ali understands Sharia law,the question is whether YOU understand it? (Other than the "enlightenment" you probably got from Newt or Glen Beck)

In case you didn't have time to take a break from hiding under your sheets or changing your diaper from fear of the "Muslim Horde" (or a possible beheading) you might have noticed over 1/4 of the world's population is Muslim and there are no daily beheadings, are there?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_world

Quote: "I think the majority of AA's converted because they felt left out and wanted to make a statement."

What a crock; now you are claiming the ability to read the minds and hearts of hundreds of thousands of African Americans who are Muslim. No small feat. And one totally oblivious to history:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_the_United_States

Excerpt: Many of the slaves brought to colonial America from Africa were Muslims[30][31]. By 1800, some 500,000 Africans arrived in what became the United States. Historians estimate that between 15 to 30 percent of all enslaved African men, and less than 15 percent of the enslaved African women, were Muslims. These enslaved Muslims stood out from their compatriots because of their "resistance, determination and education" [32]

It is estimated that over 50% of the slaves imported to North America came from areas where Islam was followed by at least a minority population. Thus, no less than 200,000 came from regions influenced by Islam. Substantial numbers originated from Senegambia, a region with an established community of Muslim inhabitants extending to the 11th century.[33]

Next time, put your false fears aside to do some homework...or real thinking. Wikipedia is weak in terms of scholarly value, but even someone with half a brain or curiosity could have consulted it before making sweeping, UNFOUNDED statements.

For the record, ALL religions are incompatible with the Constitution that's why the CONSTITUTION mandates separation of church and state. Duh.

That makes us "a Christian Nation," sorry. NOT!!!
In fact, given the majority of Slaves from Africa who were Muslim, maybe we're actually a Muslim nation, huh?

Funny how you talk about incompatibility with the Constitution when that very document has been shredded to attack Muslim countries, to rendention them to Black Sites around the world, to torture them, to assassinate them, bomb them, leave depleted uranium to poison them, destroy their civil societies, and then after committing war crimes such as these, deny them due process of law, often by invoking the cloak of "States Secrets." Secret my ass, the cat's been let out of the bag.

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/09/08/obama/index...

You "Exceptional Americans" would be funny if you weren't so dangerous. Your fear is only matched by your stupidity. I'd be willing to compare the number of innocent people, namely poor and Black, wrongfully executed in this country, the one with the largest prison population on the planet, with the number of beheadings taking place in the Muslim world.

Update:

http://afghanistan.blogs.cnn.com/2010/09/09/army-12-soldiers-killed-afgh...

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20913

" If the 911-Truthers are even half right that - 19 Muslim guys w box-cutters [most of whom shouldn’t have even been able to get in &/or stay in the US in the first place & half of them shouldn’t have been able to get on those planes that day] successfully outwitted a Trillion-$ defence-security-intelligence network..."

Nixakliel, we can be pretty certain that nobody hijacked anything that morning. Several of the accused "hijackers" turned up alive and well several days later, wondering why their photos and names were being falsely connected to an attack which, with them being alive, they obviously had nothing to do with.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/1559151.stm

For another thing, of the accused "hijacker pilots" they were not very skilled in flying even small propellor planes like Piper Cubs, and had no experience whatsoever in flying any jet engine aircraft, let alone large passenger aircraft like Boeing 757s and -767s. Alhazmi and Almihdhar were described by a flight instructor at Sorbi's Flying Club as: "It was like Dumb and Dumber," he told the New York Times. "I mean, they were clueless. It was clear to me they weren't going to make it as pilots."
http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2001/Oct-26-Fri-2001/news/1730994...

Another article quotes the instructor as saying "they had no idea what they were doing".
http://www.pulitzer.org/year/2002/national-reporting/works/093001.html

And bear in mind, this is on small propellor planes. Yet supposedly Alhazmi and Almihdhar were the first two selected as pilots by Khalid Sheikh Mohammed: "KSM trained the first two suicide operatives recruited - Saudi nationals Nawaf Alhazmi and Khalid Almihdhar"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/3813997.stm In fact, though usually Hani Hanjour is the one accused of piloting the Pentagon strike as per the official myth, an article in the San Jose Mercury News, here reprinted on JihadWatch, Alhazmi is claimed to be the "pilot" when it says: "The terrorist believed to have flown a hijacked airliner into the Pentagon on Sept. 11, 2001, obtained a California driver's license without providing the required Social Security number for identification, officials are acknowledging for the first time. Nawaf M.S. Alhazmi then used that license when he registered for the flight training that enabled him to pilot the doomed airliner." http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/004937.php And that was an article written in February 2005, so it is unclear why at that late date they still wouldn't have the official myth's details fully received and "plugged in". Regardless of whether it is an oversight or deliberate, there is no way Alhazmi, Almihdhar or Hanjour could pilot a Boeing 757 with their lack of skills in much smaller aircraft and having never flown a jet before. But you aren't supposed to think of that.

Atta and Al-Shehhi were not much good either: "In early October [2000], the two failed a Stage I exam for an instruments pilot rating."
http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/profiles/atta_and_shehhi_enroll_a...

Ziad Jarrah was little better than they were, and was denied being able to fly solo: "Because Hortman deemed Jarrah unfit to fly solo, he could fly this route only with an instructor.134 Hanjour, too, requested to fly the Hudson Corridor about this same time, at Air Fleet Training Systems in Teterboro,New Jersey, where he started receiving ground instruction soon after settling in the area with Hazmi."
http://en.wikisource.org/wiki/9/11_Commission_Report/Chapter_7

The one who had the most difficult job of all, flying an "airliner" into the Pentagon, Hani Hanjour, was the worst of them all, absolutely terrible. The 9/11 Commission report also states about Hanjour that: "Hanjour flew the Hudson Corridor, but his instructor declined a second request because of what he considered Hanjour’s poor piloting skills." Then when he was in Bowie, Maryland "He took three flights with the instructors in the second week of August, but flew so poorly he was rejected for the rental, said Marcel Bernard, chief flight instructor at Freeway."
http://www.newsline.umd.edu/justice/specialreports/stateofemergency/airp...

Yet the task he is accused of performing would have required considerable skill for even a qualified airline pilot, let alone a flight school washout. His maneuver is described thusly: "After the attacks, for example, aviation experts concluded that the final maneuvers of American Airlines Flight 77 -- a tight turn followed by a steep, accurate descent into the Pentagon -- was the work of "a great talent . . . virtually a textbook turn and landing," the law enforcement official said."
http://www.siteinstitute.org/bin/articles.cgi?ID=news902&Category=news&S...

Elsewhere described as: "The hijacker-pilots were then forced to execute a difficult high-speed descending turn. Radar shows Flight 77 did a downward spiral, turning almost a complete circle and dropping the last 7,000 feet in two-and-a-half minutes. The steep turn was so smooth, the sources say, it's clear there was no fight for control going on. And the complex maneuver suggests the hijackers had better flying skills than many investigators first believed."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/09/11/national/main310721.shtml
Here's a diagram of that manouevre: http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/evidence/docs/aa77_final_maneuver.png
This from a guy that couldn't fly a small plane well enough to be allowed to rent it and fly solo??

Clearly they didn't hijack anything and fly it into buildings. The other main problem with the "hijackers" is that not only were they nowhere near skilled enough, they were also nowhere near Muslim enough. Remember, these are nineteen people accused of being so devoutly Muslim that they were perfectly willing to sacrifice their own lives to take some "infidels" with them. But they behaved like the exact opposite of devout Muslims, or even PRACTICING Muslims. Many of them drank alcohol. Heavily. "Agents in Hollywood showed employees at a downtown restaurant, Shuckums, photos of two men. Manager Tony Amos said yesterday he identified a man in a photo with the name Mohamed on the bottom.
"The guy Mohamed [Atta] was drunk, his voice was slurred and he had a thick accent," Amos said."
http://www.nj.com/specialprojects/index.ssf?/specialprojects/huntevil/fl...

At another bar, Marwan Alshehhi is described as: "Marwan would talk to you; he enjoyed being in the bar," she said. "He enjoyed company." The article also says they frequented the bar (Outlook): "When Lizsa Lehman saw the 19 mugshots of the 9/11 terrorists displayed prominently in the newspaper, she found two familiar faces starring back at her -- Marwan al-Shehhi and Mohamed Atta. She got to know them both when they bellied up to her bar at the Outlook in Venice after their flying lessons a few miles away."
http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060910/NEWS/60...

That they were hard drinkers is confirmed by the accounts of bartenders at Shuckums among other places: "Tony Amos, the manager of Shuckums Oyster Bar and Restaurant in Hollywood, just north of Miami, was interviewed by the FBI and he and his barman and a waitress all identified Atta and his cousin as some hard drinkers who propped up the bar last Friday. Atta's bill for three hours of vodka drinking came to $48 (£33)."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2001/09/14/whunt114...

Another article says "They were wasted," said Idrissi".
http://www.sptimes.com/News/091301/Worldandnation/FBI_seizes_records_of....

The night before 9/11 Atta and Alshehhi (which later "revisions" of the official myth put in Portland, Maine that night) were at a strip club in Daytona Beach, Florida, where they were getting hammered drunk and making threats: "In Daytona Beach, Kap said he told FBI investigators the men in his bar spent $200 to $300 apiece on lap dances and drinks, paying with credit cards. Kap said he gave the FBI credit card receipts, photocopied driver's licenses, a business card left by one man and a copy of the Quran - the sacred book of Islam - that was left at the bar." (convenient little bit of "evidence" left behind isn't it?). Bear in mind, Islam forbids both drinking alcohol AND nude debauchery. It also says "They were talking about what a bad place America is. They said 'Wait 'til tomorrow. America is going to see bloodshed,"' said John Kap, manager of the Pink Pony and Red Eyed Jack's Sports Bar. Kap said they made the claims to a bartender and a patron."
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2001/09/14/national/main311268.shtml

Another article notes the contradiction between Islamic fundamentalism and hard drinking, yet doesn't try to explain it away: "It happened at Shuckums, a raw bar on Hollywood's Harrison Street. Al-Shehhi and Atta knocked back drinks -- forbidden by the Islamic teachings they so zealously embraced." (Obviously they DIDN'T "so zealously embrace" Islamic teachings!).
http://web.archive.org/web/20010922164519/www.miami.com/herald/special/n...

They also did (other) drugs, said elsewhere by Amanda Keller, Atta's supposed girlfriend, to be cocaine, and alluded to here: ""They were gone for three days," said Tony LaConca. "They didn't sleep -- it was a continuous party." LaConca said Mohamed footed the entire bill for the weekend including buying Keller and the unnamed employee new clothes, alcohol, drugs and hotel stay."
http://www.sun-herald.com/NewsArchive2/091401/tp4ch14.htm

Apparently they also smoked pot: "The students reportedly smoked a strange tobacco which smelled like marijuana, Kyser said."
http://www.sun-herald.com/NewsArchive2/091401/tp1ch11.htm?date=091401&st...

Then consider that Mohamed Atta and Ziad Jarrah both had girlfriends, and both lived with their girlfriends at times, Atta in Florida, and Jarrah when he was in Germany. This is strictly forbidden for unmarried couples to be living together. A Muslim friend of Jarrah's from Germany said "I used to criticize him for living with her. By our religion, this living together before marriage is not allowed," recalls Abdullah Al-Makhadi". http://www.aldeilis.net/english/index2.php?option=com_content&do_pdf=1&i...

"Ziad Samir Jarrah didn't fit the profile of an Islamic terrorist. He liked women. He drank. He didn't pray or attend a mosque. He didn't wear a beard. He acted more like a Westerner than someone from the Middle East, according to published reports on his background. Jarrah, 26, of Lebanon, was able to travel between the United States and Middle East even though his name was on a watch list of suspected terrorists. And twice, law enforcement authorities had him in their grasp and let him go." http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_90401.html Also, in addition to live-in girlfriends and going to strip bars, some of the "devout Islamic hijackers" sought the services of prostitutes: "While preparing to unleash their twisted ``holy war'' on America, some of the suicide hijackers set aside strict religious beliefs to whet their lusty appetites, partying with a high-priced hooker in Hub hotel rooms. A driver for a pair of local escort services told the Herald yesterday that he drove a call girl to the Park Inn in Chestnut Hill on Sept. 9 around 10:30 p.m. where she bedded down with one of the mass murderers. It was her second trip to the terrorist's room that day." http://web.archive.org/web/20011010224657/http:/www.bostonherald.com/att...

Another one, Khalid Moqed, went into two different adult book/movie stores: "An employee of an adult bookstore next door to the motel said he identified one of the suspects, Khalid Moqed, from photographs shown to him by FBI agents. In August, Moqed came into another adult bookstore, in Beltsville, where the same employee also works. When he first saw Moqed, he thought he was a police officer because of his short haircut and muscular build, said the employee, who refused to give his name. The man looked nervous and ''he didn't say anything, he just looked around at magazines and movies and left,'' the employee said."
http://chronicle.augusta.com/stories/091901/ter_124-7573.shtml

Atta and other "hijackers" took at least five trips to Las Vegas, the most sinful city in the world, and indulged in lapdances from strippers and plenty of gambling, both off-limits to faithful Muslims: "engaged in some decidedly un-Islamic sampling of prohibited pleasures in America's reputed capital of moral corrosion." "He spent about $20 for a quick dance and didn't tip more." "Samantha remembers the killer settling into the crushed red velvet chair, staring blankly up at her while she undulated her hips inches from his face." "Some of the girls here remember a couple of those guys coming in here in August, too" ""True Muslims don't drink, don't gamble, don't go to strip clubs," said Dr. Osama Haikal, president of the board of directors of the Islamic Foundation of Nevada. "These things are a sin" "If the hijackers copped a lap dance or even a watery scotch in most strict Islamic countries, they would be flogged, Haikal said"
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/1...

So knowing these things about the unskilled, un-Islamic "hijackers" it becomes pretty damned difficult to believe they did what the official myth accuses them of.

So if they weren't "Islamic fundamentalist suicide hijackers" what were they and what was their purpose? We can get some ideas as to the possible answer from some of the following clues. Consider: Several of them apparantly lived on U.S. military bases at one time or another. CNN's mention of it can be found here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yghzekjXS90 Pensacola Naval Air Station, the cradle of U.S. Navy aviation was listed as the residence of two of them. Maxwell Air Force Base was another. Brooks Air Force Base also. One supposedly attended the Defense Language Institute at Lackland Air Force Base. At least one of them lived on Tyndall Air Force Base.
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/s_55522.html
Atta supposedly trained in some capacity at Norfolk Naval Air Station. http://911digitalarchive.org/crr/documents/1320.pdf

First the DoD said "It may just be a case of mistaken identity"
http://greenvilleonline.com/news/2001/09/20/2001092012469.htm

Then they claimed to have looked into the matter and found discrepancies in the biographical data, such as their ages, that meant they were different people.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn?pagename=article&node=&contentI...

But the DoD won't provide the biographical data so that it can be independently verified that they aren't the same individuals. If they had nothing to hide they would be leaping at the chance to prove "hijackers" weren't in any way connected to U.S. military bases. Their refusal speaks volumes. Then consider: Two of the "hijackers", Alhazmi and Almihdhar, lived for a while with an F.B.I. informant in San Diego.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/09/09/attack/main521223.shtml The F.B.I. went to great lengths to prevent the 9/11 Commission from being able to interview this informant http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0524,mondo1,64920,6.html
directed by Aukai Collins, a C.I.A. and F.B.I. (yes both) informant who infiltrated Chechen Islamic guerilla forces in the 1990s, lived in Phoenix, Arizona and claimed to have known Hani Hanjour.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,344146,00.html
http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2002/07/17/collins_interview/ind...

Then consider the areas in the U.S. where the "hijackers" lived, undertook rudimentary training etc. Florida especially, San Diego, Phoenix area, and greater Washington D.C. area. All four of those are very important hubs of the military-industrial complex. Why on earth would firstly these "hijacker pilots" be undertaking their "training" in the U.S. instead of somewhere in the Middle East where they would be sure to arouse less suspicion, and secondly, upon making the inexplicably risky decision to train in their target country, why on earth would they go out of their way to live in the areas most likely to be saturated with intelligence and military personnel? Florida has been of critical importance to the C.I.A. for a long time with its close proximity to Cuba and its excellent location for importing cocaine from south America via the Caribbean. Also a haven for Cuban exiles, a group intimately connected to the C.I.A., as is the mafia, who ALSO heavily represented in Florida. They couldn't have picked a worse state for C.I.A. activity excepting Virginia, which they ALSO picked which I will address in a moment. Florida has a ton of military bases also, including the headquarters of both Special Operations Command and Central Command (the entity mostly responsible for fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan), at MacDill A.F.B. Where they spent most of their time in Florida was in the congressional districts of Katherine Harris and Porter Goss (later Director of Central Intelligence of the C.I.A.). The Bush family has a winter retreat on Boca Grande. The rest of their time in Florida was spent in the district of Bob Graham of the Senate Intelligence Committee. Graham was having breakfast with Porter Goss and the director of the ISI on the morning of 9/11. On CNN's timeline it quotes him, saying: "4:20 p.m.: U.S. Sen. Bob Graham, D-Florida, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, says he was "not surprised there was an attack (but) was surprised at the specificity." He says he was "shocked at what actually happened -- the extent of it." http://archives.cnn.com/2001/US/09/11/chronology.attack/ San Diego is enormously important to the defense industry, as well as having very important military bases there with a large Navy base and the Marines' west coast recruit depot. It was also the congressional district of corrupt Randy "Duke" Cunningham. Phoenix is also an important hub. Scottsdale has huge General Dynamics plant. Honeywell, Raytheon and L-3 Communications (who bought Titan) are in Phoenix. The C.I.A. had or has more than one airstrip in the area for its proprietary airlines. The Phoenix area is the congressional district of John McCain. In the greater Washington D.C. area they lived in Vienna, Virginia, within spitting distance of C.I.A. headquarters. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/nation/graphics/attack/hijackers.html

Others lived in Laurel, Maryland, literally right outside the gates of the N.S.A. headquarters.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/from_our_own_correspondent/2033791...

They even ate frequently at a pizzaria that was an N.S.A. hangout!
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_10-6-2002_pg4_7

Starting to see a pattern here?

The "hijackers" were nothing more than C.I.A. patsies who presumably thought they were in flight training to be C.I.A. drug smuggling pilots, flying coke into Florida. Needless to say they were surely killed off and disposed of. The ones who turned up alive were nothing more than victims of identity theft whose passports were stolen abroad either by the C.I.A. or Mossad so as to have extra "hijackers" to pad out their list to make it seem more plausible. Nothing that happened on 9/11 happened in the way in which the official MYTH would have you believe.

I know I don't have to inform Enlightened Cynic who owns the leader of Georgia, how that leader openly stated this when referring to his advisors. You know I'm not talking about the US. One look at the face of that leader and you know what he does for his owners, virtually or not. I don't want get nasty on BAR. You let the cat out the bag, Enlightened Cynic. We'll learn more than we would if I went off and started quoting Mason Verger.