The national media watch group
Updated: 10 min 37 sec ago
PBS was set up in part because of an understanding that advertising exerts pressure on media outlets. And now it's using its own advertising to signal its disapproval of critical coverage.
Generals, former generals and not much more: Corporate media are covering war the only way they know how.
A Washington Post columnist says that by "all logic" we should be drilling for more oil. What about the logic of climate change?
The People's Climate March wasn't fit for TV news, Obama is a "reluctant warrior," and the US has a "longtime concern" for human rights in Egypt.
It's no secret that the Washington Post editorial page was quite alarmed by Venezuela's shift to the left under former President Hugo Chavez. The Post–like the rest of elite US media (Extra!, 11/05)–was an unrelenting critic of Chavez's policies. Some things haven't changed. In a scathing editorial (9/20/14), the Post went after Chavez's successor Nicolas Maduro, calling him an "economically illiterate former bus driver" because he "rejected the advice of pragmatists" and will continue to pursue policies that are ruining what was "once Latin America’s richest country." During the Chavez years, the most important economic story was the rapid gains by […]
Where could Jeff Bezos have gotten the idea that it was OK to take away large sums of money that you promised people for their retirement after years of service? Well, maybe he reads the paper he just bought.
David Brooks thinks you're just dwelling on the negative in the news--and he's written a New York Times column, headlined "Snap Out of It," to set you straight.
Can a president who has launched military strikes on seven countries really be called a 'reluctant warrior?'
Not talking about the largest climate march in history left Chuck Todd with some time to fill up on NBC's Meet the Press.
This week: Watch ABC drum up fears about a terror attack on the United States. Plus we'll take a look at the state of the debate over war, and how big papers spun a study of how fracking leads to water contamination into a story about how we shouldn't blame fracking. Take a look:
The idea that the United States is being forced to suspend any 'longtime concerns' about Egyptian human rights is hard to square with reality.
A new study shows that gas leaks from fracking wells are responsible for water contamination. But some media outlets were keen to send the message that fracking isn't causing these problems.
The voice from the left on PBS wants a serious debate over Obama's war plan--but also makes it clear that airstrikes are great.
A key element in the shift in US public opinion toward attacking ISIS is the idea that the country could be attacked by the group. Where do people get this idea? TV news might be one place.
CBS host Bob Schieffer believes that ISIS poses a threat to the American "homeland" and tells viewers: "This evil must be eradicated. These forces must be destroyed."
War drums for ISIS, Kissinger confronted, Fox's non-apology.
Anything that hurts labor unions, workers and moves Democrats to the right must be something to cheer about.
Henry Kissinger is making the rounds again--mostly reminding us that elite media love to fawn over Henry Kissinger.
What does a "full range of views" look like to the New York Times? Powerful people who worked for Republicans and Democrats.
The New York Times and PBS NewsHour present very different looks at fracking. What's missing from both? Climate change.